| Literature DB >> 32269409 |
Yilang Song1, Inna M Gitman1, William J Parnell2, Harm Askes3.
Abstract
In this paper the influence of mechanical and geometrical properties, both deterministic and stochastic in nature, of a heterogeneous periodic composite material on wave propagation has been analysed in terms of the occurrence of stop-bands. Numerical analyses have been used to identify those parameters that have the most significant effect on the wave filtering properties of the medium. A striking conclusion is that randomness in geometrical properties has a much larger effect than randomness in mechanical properties.Entities:
Keywords: Composite material; Laminate; Randomness; Stop-band; Wave filter; Wave propagation
Year: 2016 PMID: 32269409 PMCID: PMC7115080 DOI: 10.1007/s10704-016-0170-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Fract ISSN: 0376-9429 Impact factor: 2.374
Fig. 1Illustration of the configuration used in numerical simulations
Fig. 2The laminate under study is a periodic two-phase material with unit cell length and equal amounts of each phase within the unit cell
Fig. 3The transmission coefficient T as a function of normalised frequency for the given configuration: contrast in Young’s modulus of material’s phases (left); contrast in density of the material’s phases (center); contrast with respect to the overall length of unit cell lengths of the phases (right). Contrast parameters and range from 0.5—solid, 0.25—dotted, 0.1—dashed, and 0.05—dot-dashed (left and center); and unit cell length ranges from —solid, —dotted, –dashed, and —dot-dashed (right)
Randomness in mechanical and geometrical parameters: associated random properties
| Case |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Periodic | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Random Young’s moduli | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 0.1 | 0.1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 0.2 | 0.2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Random densities | 0 | 0 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0 | 0 |
| 0 | 0 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0 | 0 | |
| 0 | 0 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0 | 0 | |
| Random geometry | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.05 | 0.05 |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.1 | 0.1 | |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 | 0.2 |
Fig. 4The (averaged) transmission coefficient T as a function of normalised frequency for the given configuration: randomness in Young’s modulus of material’s phases (left); randomness in density of the material’s phases (center); randomness in unit cell lengths of the phases (right). Coefficients of variation ranges from 0—solid, 0.05—dotted, 0.1—dashed, and 0.2—dot-dashed