Literature DB >> 32269342

Integrating genomic features for non-invasive early lung cancer detection.

Jacob J Chabon1,2, Emily G Hamilton3, David M Kurtz4,5,6, Mohammad S Esfahani1,4, Everett J Moding1,7, Henning Stehr8, Joseph Schroers-Martin4,5, Barzin Y Nabet1,7, Binbin Chen4,9, Aadel A Chaudhuri10,11,12, Chih Long Liu4, Angela B Hui1,7, Michael C Jin4, Tej D Azad4, Diego Almanza3, Young-Jun Jeon1, Monica C Nesselbush3, Lyron Co Ting Keh1, Rene F Bonilla7, Christopher H Yoo7, Ryan B Ko7, Emily L Chen7, David J Merriott7, Pierre P Massion13,14, Aaron S Mansfield15, Jin Jen16, Hong Z Ren16, Steven H Lin17, Christina L Costantino18,19, Risa Burr18,20, Robert Tibshirani21,22, Sanjiv S Gambhir6,23, Gerald J Berry8, Kristin C Jensen8,24, Robert B West8, Joel W Neal4, Heather A Wakelee4, Billy W Loo7, Christian A Kunder8, Ann N Leung23, Natalie S Lui25, Mark F Berry25, Joseph B Shrager24,25, Viswam S Nair23,26,27, Daniel A Haber18,20,28, Lecia V Sequist18,28, Ash A Alizadeh29,30,31,32, Maximilian Diehn33,34,35.   

Abstract

Radiologic screening of high-risk adults reduces lung-cancer-related mortality1,2; however, a small minority of eligible individuals undergo such screening in the United States3,4. The availability of blood-based tests could increase screening uptake. Here we introduce improvements to cancer personalized profiling by deep sequencing (CAPP-Seq)5, a method for the analysis of circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA), to better facilitate screening applications. We show that, although levels are very low in early-stage lung cancers, ctDNA is present prior to treatment in most patients and its presence is strongly prognostic. We also find that the majority of somatic mutations in the cell-free DNA (cfDNA) of patients with lung cancer and of risk-matched controls reflect clonal haematopoiesis and are non-recurrent. Compared with tumour-derived mutations, clonal haematopoiesis mutations occur on longer cfDNA fragments and lack mutational signatures that are associated with tobacco smoking. Integrating these findings with other molecular features, we develop and prospectively validate a machine-learning method termed 'lung cancer likelihood in plasma' (Lung-CLiP), which can robustly discriminate early-stage lung cancer patients from risk-matched controls. This approach achieves performance similar to that of tumour-informed ctDNA detection and enables tuning of assay specificity in order to facilitate distinct clinical applications. Our findings establish the potential of cfDNA for lung cancer screening and highlight the importance of risk-matching cases and controls in cfDNA-based screening studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32269342     DOI: 10.1038/s41586-020-2140-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  1 in total

1.  Screening for lung cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement.

Authors:  Virginia A Moyer
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2014-03-04       Impact factor: 25.391

  1 in total
  95 in total

1.  Development of a serum miRNA panel for detection of early stage non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Lisha Ying; Lingbin Du; Ruiyang Zou; Lei Shi; Nan Zhang; Jiaoyue Jin; Chenyang Xu; Fanrong Zhang; Chen Zhu; Junzhou Wu; Kaiyan Chen; Minran Huang; Yingxue Wu; Yimin Zhang; Weihui Zheng; Xiaodan Pan; Baofu Chen; Aifen Lin; John Kit Chung Tam; Rob Martinus van Dam; David Tien Min Lai; Kee Seng Chia; Lihan Zhou; Heng-Phon Too; Herbert Yu; Weimin Mao; Dan Su
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-09-17       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Biomarkers in lung cancer screening: the importance of study design.

Authors:  David R Baldwin; Matthew E Callister; Philip A Crosbie; Emma L O'Dowd; Robert C Rintoul; Hilary A Robbins; Robert J C Steele
Journal:  Eur Respir J       Date:  2021-01-14       Impact factor: 16.671

Review 3.  Liquid biopsy enters the clinic - implementation issues and future challenges.

Authors:  Michail Ignatiadis; George W Sledge; Stefanie S Jeffrey
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2021-01-20       Impact factor: 66.675

4.  2020 Innovation-Based Optimism for Lung Cancer Outcomes.

Authors:  Erin L Schenk; Tejas Patil; Jose Pacheco; Paul A Bunn
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2020-12-20

Review 5.  Immunotherapy in nonsmall-cell lung cancer: current status and future prospects for liquid biopsy.

Authors:  Elena María Brozos-Vázquez; Roberto Díaz-Peña; Jorge García-González; Luis León-Mateos; Patricia Mondelo-Macía; María Peña-Chilet; Rafael López-López
Journal:  Cancer Immunol Immunother       Date:  2020-10-28       Impact factor: 6.968

Review 6.  Next-Generation Liquid Biopsies: Embracing Data Science in Oncology.

Authors:  Y R Im; D W Y Tsui; L A Diaz; J C M Wan
Journal:  Trends Cancer       Date:  2020-12-13

Review 7.  Mutated circulating tumor DNA as a liquid biopsy in lung cancer detection and treatment.

Authors:  Martyna Filipska; Rafael Rosell
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 6.603

Review 8.  Oncology Scan: Radiation Biology and Genomic Predictors of Response.

Authors:  Brian Marples; Sarah Kerns
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 7.038

9.  ctDNA MRD Detection and Personalized Oncogenomic Analysis in Oligometastatic Colorectal Cancer From Plasma and Urine.

Authors:  Bruna Pellini; Nadja Pejovic; Wenjia Feng; Noah Earland; Peter K Harris; Abul Usmani; Jeffrey J Szymanski; Faridi Qaium; Jacqueline Mudd; Marvin Petty; Yuqiu Jiang; Ashla Singh; Christopher A Maher; Lauren E Henke; Haeseong Park; Matthew A Ciorba; Hyun Kim; Matthew G Mutch; Katrina S Pedersen; Benjamin R Tan; William G Hawkins; Ryan C Fields; Aadel A Chaudhuri
Journal:  JCO Precis Oncol       Date:  2021-02-12

10.  The Opportunities and Challenges of Molecular Tagging Next-Generation Sequencing in Liquid Biopsy.

Authors:  Giuseppa De Luca; Mariella Dono
Journal:  Mol Diagn Ther       Date:  2021-07-05       Impact factor: 4.074

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.