Literature DB >> 32268899

Novel PYGL mutations in Chinese children leading to glycogen storage disease type VI: two case reports.

Xiaomei Luo1,2, Jiacheng Hu3, Xueren Gao1,2, Yanjie Fan1,2, Yu Sun1,2, Xuefan Gu1,2, Wenjuan Qiu4,5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: PYGL mutations can cause liver phosphorylase deficiency, resulting in a glycogenolysis disorder, namely, glycogen storage disease (GSD) VI. The disease is rarely reported in the Chinese population. GSD VI is mainly characterized in untreated children by hepatomegaly, growth retardation and elevated liver transaminases. CASE
PRESENTATION: In this study, we report two GSD VI patients with growth retardation and abnormal liver function. There was no obvious hepatomegaly for one of them. Whole exome sequencing (WES) combined with copy number variation analysis was performed. We found a novel homozygous gross deletion, c.1621-258_2178-23del, including exons 14-17 of PYGL in patient 1. The exons 14-17 deletion of PYGL resulted in an in-frame deletion of 186 amino acids. Compound heterozygous mutations of PYGL were identified in patient 2, including a novel missense mutation c.1832C > T/p.A611V and a recurrent nonsense mutation c.280C > T/p.R94X. After treatment with uncooked cornstarch (UCS) 8 months for patient 1 and 13 months for patient 2, the liver transaminases of both patients decreased to a normal range and their stature was improved. However, patient 1 still showed mild hypertriglyceridemia.
CONCLUSIONS: We describe two GSD VI patients and expand the spectrum of PYGL mutations. Patient 1 in this study is the first GSD VI case that showed increased transaminases without obvious hepatomegaly due to a novel homozygous gross deletion of PYGL identified through WES.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Glycogen storage disease VI; Inherited metabolic disease; Molecular diagnosis; Whole exome sequencing

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32268899      PMCID: PMC7140494          DOI: 10.1186/s12881-020-01010-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Med Genet        ISSN: 1471-2350            Impact factor:   2.103


Background

Glycogen storage diseases (GSD) are a group of inherited metabolic disorders characterized by abnormal intracellular accumulation of glycogen [1, 2]. Overall, the incidence of GSD is estimated to be 1 case per 20,000 to 43,000 live births. There are over 12 types of GSD, classified based on the enzyme deficiency and the affected tissue [2]. Glycogen storage disease VI (GSD VI; Hers disease; OMIM 232700) is a rare form of GSD caused by deficiency of liver phosphorylase due to compound heterozygous or homozygous mutations of PYGL [3]. The clinical manifestations of GSD VI are similar to other forms of GSD associated with the liver, such as GSD I, GSD III, GSD IXa and GSD XI, while the treatment may be different. GSD VI is characterized in untreated children by hepatomegaly, growth retardation, and mild hypoglycemia after overnight fasting. This disease is usually a relatively mild disorder that presents in infancy and childhood. The PYGL gene is located on chromosome 14q22.1 and has 20 exons in total. Currently, the Human Gene Mutation Database (http://www.hgmd.cf.ac.uk/ac/index.php) has reported around 50 mutations in PYGL associated with GSD VI. In this study, we describe two unrelated Chinese GSD VI patients. One case resulted from a PYGL homozygous large fragment deletion that was identified through copy number variations analysis of WES depth data and the other case resulted from PYGL compound heterozygous point mutations. Interestingly, the patient with the gross deletion showed elevated liver transaminases without obvious hepatomegaly, which was unusual in GSD patients. This study was approved by Xinhua Hospital Ethics Committee Affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine (XHEC-D-2019-057).

Case presentation

Case 1

A 17-month-old Chinese girl was referred to our hospital due to unexplained elevated liver transaminases. She was the third child of consanguineous parents, was delivered at full term and weighed 3350 g. There was no family history of liver disease. Physical examination showed growth retardation with a height of 72 cm (− 2.87 SD) and a weight of 9 kg. The height of her father is 155 cm (− 2.90 SD) and that of her mother is 157 cm (− 0.67 SD). There was no obvious mental or motor developmental delay. The patient had no obvious hepatomegaly or splenomegaly. Laboratory examinations in the local hospital showed increased liver enzymes, lactate, and triglycerides after fasting. Her blood glucose was normal or occasionally reduced after different fasting periods. Whole exome sequencing (WES) was applied to detect small deletions/insertions and single nucleotide variations. The exome library was constructed using an xGen Exome Research Panel v1.0 (Integrated DNA Technologies, San Diego, CA, USA). An Illumina Hi-seq 4000 sequencer (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) was used for high-throughput sequencing. Variants were filtered based on frequency, inheritance pattern, clinical phenotype and pathogenicity. The variant calling software revealed a large fragment deletion of the PYGL gene in patient 1. The Integrative Genomics Viewer showed this homozygous c.1621-258_2178-23del through the bam file (Fig. 1a), which was a gross in-frame deletion. The deletion, which included exons 14–17, was 3581 bp and located on chr14 nt. 51,375,696–51,379,279. The fragments (exons 14 to 17) of the parents could be amplified, while the products of the proband were absent according to the agarose gel electrophoresis (Fig. 1b). Sanger sequencing was performed to verify the breakpoints of the deletion, which was NM_002863.4: c.1621-258_2178-23del (Fig. 1c). The reference sequence in Fig. 1c was from NCBI reference sequences NG_012796.1. Fluorescent gap PCR analysis was used to verify the deletion. The primers F and R2 flank the PYGL deletion, whereas the primer R1 anneals within the deleted region (Fig. 1d). The capillary electrophoresis results of fluorescent gap PCR products confirmed the homozygous deletion in the proband and revealed that the parents were both heterozygous deletion carriers (Fig. 1e). The primers used for PCR amplification are listed in Supplementary materials (Table S1, S2 and S3).
Fig. 1

Different methods used to confirm the gross deletion in patient 1. a Bam file of the proband showed the gross deletion including exons 14 to 17. b Agarose gel electrophoresis results verified the homozygous deletion of the proband. Lanes 1–12 contained PCR products for the proband (exons 14–15), father (exons 14–15), mother (exons 14–15), control (exons 14–15), proband (exon 16), father (exon 16), mother (exon 16), control (exon 16), proband (exon 17), father (exon 17), mother (exon 17) and control (exon 17), respectively. c Sanger sequencing revealed c.1621-258_2178-23del. d Schematic diagram of the three primers used in fluorescent gap PCR analysis. e Capillary electrophoresis of fluorescent gap PCR revealed the homozygous deletion in the proband and the heterozygous deletion in her parents

Different methods used to confirm the gross deletion in patient 1. a Bam file of the proband showed the gross deletion including exons 14 to 17. b Agarose gel electrophoresis results verified the homozygous deletion of the proband. Lanes 1–12 contained PCR products for the proband (exons 14–15), father (exons 14–15), mother (exons 14–15), control (exons 14–15), proband (exon 16), father (exon 16), mother (exon 16), control (exon 16), proband (exon 17), father (exon 17), mother (exon 17) and control (exon 17), respectively. c Sanger sequencing revealed c.1621-258_2178-23del. d Schematic diagram of the three primers used in fluorescent gap PCR analysis. e Capillary electrophoresis of fluorescent gap PCR revealed the homozygous deletion in the proband and the heterozygous deletion in her parents Uncooked cornstarch (UCS) 4 times a day (1.5 g/kg/each time) was recommended for treatment. Patient 1 improved her growth from − 2.87 SD to − 1.96 SD after 8 months of treatment, and all the biochemical parameters except for triglycerides were normal. Her triglycerides value decreased from 4.39 mmol/L to 2.15 mmol/L after treatment for 8 months, while it was still slightly above the normal range (0.56–1.69 mmol/L). The detailed laboratory values at diagnosis and after treatment for patient 1 are listed in Table 1.
Table 1

Biochemical parameters of the two patients before and after treatment

Patient 1Patient 2Reference
BeforeAfteraBeforeAfterb
Glucose (mmol/L)4.264.233.434.23.8–6.2
ALT (U/L)162.830921110–40
AST (U/L)230.9381022810–40
γGT(U/L)611074110–25
Lactate (mmol/L)4.03/2.5c1.0NA1.30.7–2.1
TG (mmol/L)4.392.154.371.570.56–1.69
TC (mmol/L)3.473.093.73.762.33–5.69
Uric acid (μmol/L)342208402322100–410
Total protein (g/L)58.260.166.470.758–80
Prealbumin (mg/L)180NA160NA100–300
Ketone (mmol/L)dNNNNN
CK22NA51NA18–173

Abbreviations: ALT alanine transaminase, AST aspartate aminotransferase, γGT gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase, TG triglycerides, TC total cholesterol, N negative, NA not available

aThe laboratory values of patient 1 after treatment for 8 months

bThe laboratory values of patient 2 after treatment for 13 months

cThe lactate concentration had been tested for twice after fasting

dKetone test used urine sample, and the other biochemical tests used serum samples

Biochemical parameters of the two patients before and after treatment Abbreviations: ALT alanine transaminase, AST aspartate aminotransferase, γGT gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase, TG triglycerides, TC total cholesterol, N negative, NA not available aThe laboratory values of patient 1 after treatment for 8 months bThe laboratory values of patient 2 after treatment for 13 months cThe lactate concentration had been tested for twice after fasting dKetone test used urine sample, and the other biochemical tests used serum samples

Case 2

This patient was a 26-month-old Chinese girl who was the second child of nonconsanguineous parents. The child was born after a normal gestational period. There was no family history of liver disease. She was admitted to the hospital due to growth retardation with a height of 83 cm (− 1.67 SD). The height of her father is 176 cm (+ 0.54 SD), and that of the mother is 164 cm (+ 0.63 SD). Physical examination showed hepatomegaly (7 cm below the right costal margin). Laboratory tests showed significantly increased liver transaminases, elevated triglycerides and slightly decreased glucose. WES was performed as described above. The results suggested that patient 2 inherited compound heterozygous mutations on the PYGL gene, including c.280C > T/p.R94X on exon 2 from her mother and c.1832C > T/p.A611V on exon 16 from her father (Fig. 2). The missense mutation c.1832C > T/p.A611V is a novel mutation that had not been reported previously and can be classified as a likely pathogenic mutation (PM2 + PM3 + PP3 + PP4) according to the American College of Medical Genetics guidelines for variant interpretation [4].
Fig. 2

Sanger sequencing validation of the PYGL gene mutations. The arrows show the compound heterozygous mutations of patient 2

Sanger sequencing validation of the PYGL gene mutations. The arrows show the compound heterozygous mutations of patient 2 The patient increased from − 1.67 SD to − 1.61 SD after 13 months of UCS treatment as patient 1, and the size of her liver was normal. All her biochemical parameters were normal. The detailed laboratory values at diagnosis and after treatment for patient 2 are listed in Table 1.

Discussion and conclusions

GSD VI is caused by deficient liver phosphorylase activity, resulting in excessive accumulation of glycogen in the liver. The disease is usually a relatively mild disorder characterized in untreated children by hepatomegaly, growth retardation, mild hypoglycemia, and increased liver transaminases. Generally, several liver GSDs, such as GSD I, GSD III, GSD VI and GSD IX, often manifest with similar phenotypes such as short stature, hypoglycemia and hepatomegaly. GSD I patients are more severe without ketosis. GSD III infants usually have more obvious elevated liver enzyme and ketosis. GSD XI patients have malabsorption, renal abnormalities and acidosis. Among these different GSD types, GSD IXa is the type that is most similar to GSD VI because it results from deficiency of liver phosphorylase kinase, and phosphorylase kinase deficiency can itself lead to reduced liver phosphorylase activity [5]. Next-generation sequencing has been considered the preferred diagnostic method for GSD [5-7] because invasive liver biopsy can be avoided. We identified a novel homozygous gross deletion mutation (c.1621-258_2178-23del) of PYGL in patient 1 through WES. This gross deletion was further verified through agarose gel electrophoresis and fluorescent gap PCR analysis. For patient 2, we identified compound heterozygous point mutations in PYGL through WES, including a recurrent nonsense mutation c.280C > T/p.R94X on exon 2 and a novel missense mutation c.1832C > T/p.A611V on exon 16, which can be classified as a likely pathogenic mutation. Patients with GSD VI are generally normal at birth and receive attention during the infant stage due to short stature or hepatomegaly. Hepatomegaly is often regarded as the classic manifestation and presented in all of about 50 GSD VI pediatric patients described in literature [3, 8–12]. However, hepatomegaly was nearly absent in patient 1 in our study. We assume that some GSD VI patients may only manifest with short stature and increased liver transaminases without obvious hepatomegaly, which broadened the phenotype spectrum of GSD VI. Based on the nonspecific and variable nature of the disease, GSD VI patients is almost certainly underdiagnosed in the general population, leading to an underestimation of its prevalence. GSD VI can be under-diagnosed especially in China, because the ability for diagnosis of the disease varies greatly among the different geographical regions. To date, missense/nonsense and splice site mutations have been the major PYGL mutation types in Human Gene Mutation Database, and gross deletion has rarely been reported. There are 20 exons and a total of 2544 bp in the PYGL coding sequence. The liver phosphorylase consists of 847 amino acids and the structure of the protein has not been determined. The gross deletion of PYGL exons 14–17 in patient 1 encodes 186 amino acids, which accounts for approximately 22% of the whole protein length. According to the ClinGen Sequence Variant Interpretation Working Group, removing > 10% of the protein product is more likely to have a loss of function effect compared to variants that remove < 10% of the protein [13]. However, the clinical course of patient 1 carrying the deletion were similar to the patient 2 carrying a nonsense mutation and a missense mutation. There is a high likelihood that this gross deletion may result in a stable expressed truncated protein. Mutations such as the gross in-frame deletion have implications for further interventions, such as gene therapy. For example, antisense oligonucleotide-mediated exon skipping is an emerging therapy for Duchenne muscular dystrophy patients. Exon skipping can restore the reading frame by removing the mutant exon and/or its flanking exon(s) from the pre-mRNA, leading to the expression of truncated but functional proteins [14]. The effect of this gross deletion on the liver phosphorylase requires further functional assays using either RNA or mutant protein analysis. RT-PCR and western blotting could not be conducted due to the unavailability of liver tissue. Both of the two patients responded very well to frequent UCS treatment (4 times a day). They have achieved catch-up growth. For patient 1, all the biochemical parameters except for triglycerides were normal. Her laboratory test revealed mild hypertriglyceridemia. The hyperlipidemia is a result of both increased synthesis from excess of acetyl-coenzyme A via malonyl-coenzyme A, and decreased serum lipid clearance. The hyperlipidemia responds to intensive dietary treatment, indicating hyperlipidemia is also a sign of altered glycogen metabolism and enhanced counterregulation hormone production associated with inadequate production of glucose from the liver. According to a retrospective study of six GSD VI patients treated with small, frequent meals as well as cornstarch in the evening, three younger patients showed persistent hyperglyceridemia and the youngest patient (2.5 years old) simultaneously showed obvious elevated transaminases (ALT = 344 U/L, AST = 266 U/L) even after 1.5 years’ follow up [10]. A murine model of GSD VI revealed that elevated liver enzymes could increase the risk of liver damage, inflammation, and fibrosis [15]. We speculate that for younger patients, more frequent and intensive UCS treatment for the initial one year should be used to ensure the better metabolic control and catch-up growth. In this study, we describe two unrelated patients of GSD VI and the clinical course. We report novel mutations (c.1832C > T/p.A611V and c.1621-258_2178-23del) and expand the PYGL mutation spectrum. Based on the results of our molecular investigation, the patients received precise diagnoses and efficient medical management. Additional file 1 : Table S1. Primers used in PCR amplification (Fig. 1b). Table S2. Primers used in PCR amplification (Fig. 1c). Table S3. Primers used in fluorescent gap PCR amplification (Fig. 1d)
  15 in total

Review 1.  Hepatic glycogen storage disorders: what have we learned in recent years?

Authors:  Patricie Burda; Michel Hochuli
Journal:  Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 4.294

2.  Mutations in the liver glycogen phosphorylase gene (PYGL) underlying glycogenosis type VI.

Authors:  B Burwinkel; H D Bakker; E Herschkovitz; S W Moses; Y S Shin; M W Kilimann
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 11.025

3.  Recommendations for interpreting the loss of function PVS1 ACMG/AMP variant criterion.

Authors:  Ahmad N Abou Tayoun; Tina Pesaran; Marina T DiStefano; Andrea Oza; Heidi L Rehm; Leslie G Biesecker; Steven M Harrison
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2018-09-07       Impact factor: 4.878

4.  Identification of a mutation in liver glycogen phosphorylase in glycogen storage disease type VI.

Authors:  S Chang; M J Rosenberg; H Morton; C A Francomano; L G Biesecker
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 6.150

5.  High frequency of missense mutations in glycogen storage disease type VI.

Authors:  N J Beauchamp; J Taybert; M P Champion; V Layet; P Heinz-Erian; A Dalton; M S Tanner; E Pronicka; M J Sharrard
Journal:  J Inherit Metab Dis       Date:  2007-08-21       Impact factor: 4.982

Review 6.  Glycogen storage diseases: new perspectives.

Authors:  Hasan Ozen
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-05-14       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  Diagnosis and management of glycogen storage diseases type VI and IX: a clinical practice resource of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG).

Authors:  Priya S Kishnani; Jennifer Goldstein; Stephanie L Austin; Pamela Arn; Bert Bachrach; Deeksha S Bali; Wendy K Chung; Areeg El-Gharbawy; Laurie M Brown; Stephen Kahler; Surekha Pendyal; Katalin M Ross; Laurie Tsilianidis; David A Weinstein; Michael S Watson
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2019-01-19       Impact factor: 8.822

8.  Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology.

Authors:  Sue Richards; Nazneen Aziz; Sherri Bale; David Bick; Soma Das; Julie Gastier-Foster; Wayne W Grody; Madhuri Hegde; Elaine Lyon; Elaine Spector; Karl Voelkerding; Heidi L Rehm
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2015-03-05       Impact factor: 8.822

9.  Liver Glycogen Phosphorylase Deficiency Leads to Profibrogenic Phenotype in a Murine Model of Glycogen Storage Disease Type VI.

Authors:  Lane H Wilson; Jun-Ho Cho; Ana Estrella; Joan A Smyth; Rong Wu; Tayoot Chengsupanimit; Laurie M Brown; David A Weinstein; Young Mok Lee
Journal:  Hepatol Commun       Date:  2019-09-24

10.  Clinical application of massively parallel sequencing in the molecular diagnosis of glycogen storage diseases of genetically heterogeneous origin.

Authors:  Jing Wang; Hong Cui; Ni-Chung Lee; Wuh-Liang Hwu; Yin-Hsiu Chien; William J Craigen; Lee-Jun Wong; Victor Wei Zhang
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2012-08-16       Impact factor: 8.822

View more
  7 in total

1.  miR-155-5p regulates hypoxia-induced pulmonary artery smooth muscle cell function by targeting PYGL.

Authors:  Guowen Wang; Xuefang Tao; Linlin Peng
Journal:  Bioengineered       Date:  2022-05       Impact factor: 6.832

2.  Whole-Exome Sequencing Uncovers Novel Causative Variants and Additional Findings in Three Patients Affected by Glycogen Storage Disease Type VI and Fanconi-Bickel Syndrome.

Authors:  Maryam Eghbali; Kiyana Sadat Fatemi; Shadab Salehpour; Maryam Abiri; Hassan Saei; Saeed Talebi; Nasrin Alipour Olyaei; Vahid Reza Yassaee; Mohammad Hossein Modarressi
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2021-01-11       Impact factor: 4.599

Review 3.  Hypoglycaemia Metabolic Gene Panel Testing.

Authors:  Arianna Maiorana; Francesca Romana Lepri; Antonio Novelli; Carlo Dionisi-Vici
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-03-29       Impact factor: 5.555

4.  Genotypic and phenotypic characteristics of 12 chinese children with glycogen storage diseases.

Authors:  Rui Dong; Xuxia Wei; Kaihui Zhang; Fengling Song; Yuqiang Lv; Min Gao; Dong Wang; Jian Ma; Zhongtao Gai; Yi Liu
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2022-08-29       Impact factor: 4.772

5.  Integrated liver proteomics and metabolomics identify metabolic pathways affected by pantothenic acid deficiency in Pekin ducks.

Authors:  Jing Tang; Yongbao Wu; Bo Zhang; Suyun Liang; Zhanbao Guo; Jian Hu; Zhengkui Zhou; Ming Xie; Shuisheng Hou
Journal:  Anim Nutr       Date:  2022-06-21

Review 6.  Features of chinese patients with sitosterolemia.

Authors:  Zhizi Zhou; Xueying Su; Yanna Cai; Tzer Hwu Ting; Wen Zhang; Yunting Lin; Aijing Xu; Xiaojian Mao; Chunhua Zeng; Li Liu; Xiuzhen Li
Journal:  Lipids Health Dis       Date:  2022-01-18       Impact factor: 3.876

7.  A Novel Model Based on Necroptosis-Related Genes for Predicting Prognosis of Patients With Prostate Adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Xin-Yu Li; Jian-Xiong You; Lu-Yu Zhang; Li-Xin Su; Xi-Tao Yang
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-01-11
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.