Literature DB >> 3226889

The recognition of words after their acoustic offsets in spontaneous speech: effects of subsequent context.

E G Bard, R C Shillcock, G T Altmann.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  1988        PMID： 3226889     DOI： 10.3758/bf03210424

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN： 0031-5117


× No keyword cloud information.
  11 in total

1.  The TRACE model of speech perception.

Authors:  J L McClelland; J L Elman
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Functional parallelism in spoken word-recognition.

Authors:  W D Marslen-Wilson
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1987-03

3.  Prosodic structure and spoken word recognition.

Authors:  F Grosjean; J P Gee
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1987-03

4.  Spoken word recognition processes and the gating paradigm.

Authors:  F Grosjean
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1980-10

5.  The gating paradigm: a comparison of successive and individual presentation formats.

Authors:  S Cotton; F Grosjean
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1984-01

6.  The recognition of words after their acoustic offset: evidence and implications.

Authors:  F Grosjean
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1985-10

7.  The unintelligibility of speech to children.

Authors:  E G Bard; A H Anderson
Journal:  J Child Lang       Date:  1983-06

8.  Is gating an on-line task? Evidence from naming latency data.

Authors:  L K Tyler; J Wessels
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1985-09

9.  The temporal structure of spoken language understanding.

Authors:  W Marslen-Wilson; L K Tyler
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1980-03

10.  Linguistic structure and speech shadowing at very short latencies.

Authors:  W Marslen-Wilson
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1973-08-24       Impact factor: 49.962
View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  Comprehension of synthetic speech produced by rule: a review and theoretical interpretation.

Authors:  S A Duffy; D B Pisoni
Journal:  Lang Speech       Date:  1992 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 1.500

2.  How Do You Deal With Uncertainty? Cochlear Implant Users Differ in the Dynamics of Lexical Processing of Noncanonical Inputs.

Authors:  Bob McMurray; Tyler P Ellis; Keith S Apfelbaum
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2019 Jul/Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  Eye movement evidence that readers maintain and act on uncertainty about past linguistic input.

Authors:  Roger Levy; Klinton Bicknell; Tim Slattery; Keith Rayner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-11-24       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Robust speech perception: recognize the familiar, generalize to the similar, and adapt to the novel.

Authors:  Dave F Kleinschmidt; T Florian Jaeger
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 8.934

5.  Learning During Processing: Word Learning Doesn't Wait for Word Recognition to Finish.

Authors:  Keith S Apfelbaum; Bob McMurray
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2016-07-29

6.  Puzzle-solving science: the quixotic quest for units in speech perception.

Authors:  Stephen D Goldinger; Tamiko Azuma
Journal:  J Phon       Date:  2003-10-20

7.  The gating paradigm: effects of presentation format on spoken word recognition by children and adults.

Authors:  A C Walley; V L Michela; D R Wood
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1995-04

8.  DIANA, a Process-Oriented Model of Human Auditory Word Recognition.

Authors:  Louis Ten Bosch; Lou Boves; Mirjam Ernestus
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2022-05-23

9.  Gradient activation of speech categories facilitates listeners' recovery from lexical garden paths, but not perception of speech-in-noise.

Authors:  Efthymia C Kapnoula; Jan Edwards; Bob McMurray
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2021-04       Impact factor: 3.077

10.  The role of segmental and durational cues in the processing of reduced words.

Authors:  Marco van de Ven; Mirjam Ernestus
Journal:  Lang Speech       Date:  2017-09-04       Impact factor: 1.500
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.