Literature DB >> 32267923

Current status of genomic evaluation.

Ignacy Misztal1, Daniela Lourenco1, Andres Legarra2.   

Abstract

Early application of genomic selection relied on SNP estimation with phenotypes or de-regressed proofs (DRP). Chips of 50k SNP seemed sufficient for an accurate estimation of SNP effects. Genomic estimated breeding values (GEBV) were composed of an index with parent average, direct genomic value, and deduction of a parental index to eliminate double counting. Use of SNP selection or weighting increased accuracy with small data sets but had minimal to no impact with large data sets. Efforts to include potentially causative SNP derived from sequence data or high-density chips showed limited or no gain in accuracy. After the implementation of genomic selection, EBV by BLUP became biased because of genomic preselection and DRP computed based on EBV required adjustments, and the creation of DRP for females is hard and subject to double counting. Genomic selection was greatly simplified by single-step genomic BLUP (ssGBLUP). This method based on combining genomic and pedigree relationships automatically creates an index with all sources of information, can use any combination of male and female genotypes, and accounts for preselection. To avoid biases, especially under strong selection, ssGBLUP requires that pedigree and genomic relationships are compatible. Because the inversion of the genomic relationship matrix (G) becomes costly with more than 100k genotyped animals, large data computations in ssGBLUP were solved by exploiting limited dimensionality of genomic data due to limited effective population size. With such dimensionality ranging from 4k in chickens to about 15k in cattle, the inverse of G can be created directly (e.g., by the algorithm for proven and young) at a linear cost. Due to its simplicity and accuracy, ssGBLUP is routinely used for genomic selection by the major chicken, pig, and beef industries. Single step can be used to derive SNP effects for indirect prediction and for genome-wide association studies, including computations of the P-values. Alternative single-step formulations exist that use SNP effects for genotyped or for all animals. Although genomics is the new standard in breeding and genetics, there are still some problems that need to be solved. This involves new validation procedures that are unaffected by selection, parameter estimation that accounts for all the genomic data used in selection, and strategies to address reduction in genetic variances after genomic selection was implemented.
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science.

Entities:  

Keywords:  genomic evaluation; genomic selection; large data; single-step GBLUP

Year:  2020        PMID: 32267923     DOI: 10.1093/jas/skaa101

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  14 in total

1.  On the equivalence between marker effect models and breeding value models and direct genomic values with the Algorithm for Proven and Young.

Authors:  Matias Bermann; Daniela Lourenco; Natalia S Forneris; Andres Legarra; Ignacy Misztal
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2022-07-16       Impact factor: 5.100

2.  Improving Genomic Prediction for Seed Quality Traits in Oat (Avena sativa L.) Using Trait-Specific Relationship Matrices.

Authors:  Malachy T Campbell; Haixiao Hu; Trevor H Yeats; Lauren J Brzozowski; Melanie Caffe-Treml; Lucía Gutiérrez; Kevin P Smith; Mark E Sorrells; Michael A Gore; Jean-Luc Jannink
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2021-03-31       Impact factor: 4.599

3.  Accounting for Genetic Differences Among Unknown Parents in Bubalus bubalis: A Case Study From the Italian Mediterranean Buffalo.

Authors:  Mayra Gómez; Dario Rossi; Roberta Cimmino; Gianluigi Zullo; Yuri Gombia; Damiano Altieri; Rossella Di Palo; Stefano Biffani
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2021-02-04       Impact factor: 4.599

4.  A Random Regression Model Based on a Single-Step Method for Improving the Genomic Prediction Accuracy of Residual Feed Intake in Pigs.

Authors:  Ye Wang; Chenguang Diao; Huimin Kang; Wenjie Hao; Raphael Mrode; Junhai Chen; Jianfeng Liu; Lei Zhou
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 4.599

5.  Validation of single-step genomic predictions using the linear regression method for milk yield and heat tolerance in a Thai-Holstein population.

Authors:  Piriyaporn Sungkhapreecha; Ignacy Misztal; Jorge Hidalgo; Daniela Lourenco; Sayan Buaban; Vibuntita Chankitisakul; Wuttigrai Boonkum
Journal:  Vet World       Date:  2021-12-15

6.  Efficient approximation of reliabilities for single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor models with the Algorithm for Proven and Young.

Authors:  Matias Bermann; Daniela Lourenco; Ignacy Misztal
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2022-01-01       Impact factor: 3.159

Review 7.  Evolutionary pressures rendered by animal husbandry practices for avian influenza viruses to adapt to humans.

Authors:  Maristela Martins de Camargo; Alexandre Rodrigues Caetano; Isabel Kinney Ferreira de Miranda Santos
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2022-03-01

Review 8.  An Appropriate Genetic Approach for Improving Reproductive Traits in Crossbred Thai-Holstein Cattle under Heat Stress Conditions.

Authors:  Akhmad Fathoni; Wuttigrai Boonkum; Vibuntita Chankitisakul; Monchai Duangjinda
Journal:  Vet Sci       Date:  2022-03-28

9.  Genotype-by-environment interactions for reproduction, body composition, and growth traits in maternal-line pigs based on single-step genomic reaction norms.

Authors:  Shi-Yi Chen; Pedro H F Freitas; Hinayah R Oliveira; Sirlene F Lázaro; Yi Jian Huang; Jeremy T Howard; Youping Gu; Allan P Schinckel; Luiz F Brito
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2021-06-17       Impact factor: 4.297

10.  Evaluation of Genome-Enabled Prediction for Carcass Primal Cut Yields Using Single-Step Genomic Best Linear Unbiased Prediction in Hanwoo Cattle.

Authors:  Masoumeh Naserkheil; Hossein Mehrban; Deukmin Lee; Mi Na Park
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2021-11-25       Impact factor: 4.096

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.