Andrew Polaszek1, John S Noyes1, Stephen Russell2, Mohsen M Ramadan3. 1. Dept of Life Sciences, Natural History Museum, London, England, United Kingdom. 2. Core Research Laboratories, Natural History Museum, London, England, United Kingdom. 3. Division of Plant Industry, Plant Pest Control Branch, Hawaii Department of Agriculture, Honolulu, Hawaii.
Abstract
A new species of encyrtid wasp, Metaphycus macadamiae Polaszek & Noyes sp. n., (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae: Encyrtinae) is described as a solitary endoparasitoid of the invasive macadamia felted coccid, Acanthococcus ironsidei (Hemiptera: Eriococcidae) in Hawaii. This parasitoid is native to Australia, and the species description is based on material collected from a Macadamia integrifolia Maiden & Betche (Proteaceae) plantation in New South Wales, Australia, the native region of the host tree and insect. It is described here because it is a potential biological control agent against this pest where it has recently invaded Hawaii and South Africa.
A new species of encyrtid wasp, Metaphycus macadamiae Polaszek & Noyes sp. n., (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae: Encyrtinae) is described as a solitary endoparasitoid of the invasive macadamia felted coccid, Acanthococcus ironsidei (Hemiptera: Eriococcidae) in Hawaii. This parasitoid is native to Australia, and the species description is based on material collected from a Macadamia integrifolia Maiden & Betche (Proteaceae) plantation in New South Wales, Australia, the native region of the host tree and insect. It is described here because it is a potential biological control agent against this pest where it has recently invaded Hawaii and South Africa.
Macadamia felted coccid (MFC), Acanthococcus ironsidei (Williams,
1973) (Hemiptera: Eriococcidae), is an Australian species, first found in Hawaii in
2005. On the Big Island, A. ironsidei has been
found at Honomalino in South Kona. No infestations have been reported on the other
neighbouring islands [1].
Host plants are restricted to smooth and rough-shelled macadamiaMacadamia
integrefolia and M. tetraphylla,
respectively [2]. The species
has become a problem in orchards where infested propagating material has been
introduced, and where natural enemies do not keep it under control. Sometimes
infested trees can be detected by a dull bronze colour in the foliage. In 2013 a
species of the encyrtid parasitoid wasp genus Metaphycus was
introduced from Australia into selected areas of Hawaii as an attempt at classical
biological control of E. ironsidei. The new
species is described below both to facilitate identification in the future, and to
provide the formal nomenclature essential for all future work with this
parasitoid.Hawaii is the third largest producer of macadamia nuts in the world after Australia
and South Africa. The macadamia nut industry is one of the top five agricultural
commodities for the state. It is a vital part of the agricultural economy, with
approximately 18,000 acres harvested on the Big Island of Hawaii, and farm value for
the 2017–2018 crop is estimated at $53.9 million [3].Host plants of A. ironsidei are restricted to
macadamia [2, 4]. Adult females are immobile,
resembling mealybugs, and lay their eggs within felted sacs that enclose their
bodies. The life cycle takes approximately four weeks in Hawaii, and many
overlapping generations are produced [5].MFC is a severe pest of macadamia infesting all above-ground parts of trees,
including the nut husks, and causing leaf malformation, discoloration and die-back
of large parts of the tree [4, 6]. Heavy
infestation causes death of young seedlings, reduction in nut production, and severe
damage can eventually kill affected mature trees. Ironside [4] also mentioned that dense infestations could
cause flower drop and subsequent reduction in nut setting.MFC was initially found infesting macadamia trees at Honomalino, South Kona on the
Big Island of Hawaii in February 2005. It is now expanding its distribution to
Pahala and Paauilo throughout northern and eastern plantations. If not controlled,
MFC will continue to threaten the entire macadamia nut industry in Hawaii. Recent
state-wide surveys show that the other five Hawaiian islands are free of
infestation.In small to moderate sized trees, MFC infestations can be managed effectively using
sprays of horticultural oils, a practice that has been used during outbreaks in
Australia. Chemical control is expensive and potentially damaging to the
environment, and most farmers in Hawaii would prefer not to spray. However, with the
dense canopy in Hawaii’s orchards, the MFC populations appear to thrive, and local
natural enemies are less common than in other areas. Imidacloprid root-drench
application appears to be ineffective, and there are concerns relating to honeybee
impact, as bees are commonly deployed for pollination in the orchards (Mark Wright,
UH, personal communication).Local predators and parasitoids may be helping to suppress the scale, but control at
population level is not effective and needs to be enhanced by other selective
parasitoids. Several extant natural enemies associated with MFC were observed in
Hawaii including five species of predatory beetles, and the aphelinid parasitoid,
Encarsia lounsburyi (Berlese & Paoli) [7]. Several entomopathogenic
fungi kill A. ironsidei under laboratory
conditions, but quantitative field studies are still pending [8].Following a classical biological control approach, surveys in the native region to
discover the key natural enemies suppressing MFC populations are essential for the
Hawaii Department of Agriculture (HDOA) biocontrol program. MFC is less of a problem
in Australia than in Hawaii, and specific natural enemies are thought to be an
important mortality factor. The Plant Pest Control Branch (HDOA) considered that
classical biological control could offer a long-term solution for suppression of
MFC. In December 2013, HDOA initiated a foreign exploration to Australia to search
for natural enemies of MFC. Macadamia and MFC are native to Australia, and therefore
it was the most likely place for locating host-specific parasitoids. An encyrtid
wasp, Metaphycus sp., was collected and shipped for host
specificity tests in the HDOA Insect Containment Facility. Morphology-based
identification (by JSN) revealed the species to be undescribed, and this was later
confirmed by sequencing of two gene fragments, partial mitochondrial CO1 and
ribosomal 28sD2. The new species is described below both to facilitate
identification in the future and to provide the formal nomenclature essential for
all future work with this parasitoid.
Materials and methods
Specimen depositories: Abbreviations
ANIC: Australian National Insect Collection, CSIRO, Canberra, Australia.BPBM: Bernice P. Bishop Museum, Honolulu, Hawaii.NHMUK: Natural History Museum,. London, UK.USNM: United States national Museum, Washington D.C., USA.
Collection
In November 2013, a survey was undertaken by MMR in Alstonville, NSW, Australia
Australia (28°51’ 20.14”S, 153°26’31.40”E), where Metaphycus
was dissected from MFC infested leaves of Macadamia
integrifolia. Two shipments of infested macadamia leaves were
collected and shipped to Hawaii. Infested leaves were taken from different trees
that were not known to be sprayed, and these leaves produced adult
Metaphycus wasps. A colony was initiated from 55 founder
Metaphycus adults reared on seedlings infested with MFC at
the HDOA Insect Containment Facility (Honolulu). The colony is still active, and
wasps are currently used to conduct studies on host range and biology.
Morphological study
Morphological terminology and the format for the species description follow Noyes
[9].Abbreviations are as follows: AOD = largest diameter of anterior ocellus; AOL =
minimum distance between posterior ocellus and anterior ocellus; EL = eye
length; EW = eye width; FV = minimum width of frontovertex; FVL = length of
frontovertex from occipital margin to top of antennal scrobes as seen in dorsal
view; FVS = width of frontovertex a little above top of scrobes at a point where
eye margin changes from being virtually straight to distinctly curved; FWL =
fore wing length; FWW = fore wing width; GL = gonostylus length; HW = head width
measured in facial view; HWL = hind wing length; HWW = hind wing width; MS =
malar space (minimum distance between eye and mouth margin); MT = mid tibia
length OCL = minimum distance between posterior ocellus and occipital margin; OL
= ovipositor length; OOL = minimum distance between eye margin and adjacent
posterior ocellus; POD = largest diameter of posterior ocellus; POL = minimum
distance between posterior ocelli; SL = scape length; SW = scape width.Card-mounted specimens were observed with a Leitz Dialux binocular microscope at
magnifications ranging from 20-80x. Slide-mounted specimens were observed with a
Leitz Dialux 20 microscope at magnifications ranging from 40-400x.Images were generated as follows: Fig 1 (Holotype habitus: Canon DSLR with 100 mm macrolens, processed
with HeliconFocus stacking software with final editing in Adobe Photoshop CC.
Figs 2 & 3: Canon DSLR with 10x
Mitutoyo objective, processed with HeliconFocus stacking software with final
editing in Adobe Photoshop CC. Figs 4–13 Leitz
Dialux 20EB compound microscope using Nomarski Differential Interference
Contrast illumination, photographed with MicroPublisher 5.0 RTV camera; scanned
sections stacked and combined using Synoptics AutoMontage® software,
and final images edited with Adobe Photoshop CC®.
Fig 1
Metaphycus macadamiae female holotype, habitus
(photo by N. Dale-Skey–specimen subsequently slide-mounted).
Fig 2
M. macadamiae female holotype,
antenna, inner and outer aspects.
Fig 3
M. macadamiae female holotype, fore
and hind wings.
Fig 4
M. macadamiae female holotype,
head, frontal view.
Fig 13
M. macadamiae male
genitalia.
DNA sequencing
Genomic DNA extraction was undertaken using the protocol in Polaszek et
al [10] and
Cruaud et al. [11], which leaves the sclerotized parts of the specimen intact.
Specimens were then critical point dried and card-mounted, with selected
individuals then dissected and mounted in Canada balsam on microscope
slides.As the Folmer primer pair LCO1490/ HCO2198 [12] does not perform well in many chalcid
wasp taxa [13-15], especially in those
with suboptimal DNA extracts [16], a shorter than standard CO1 sequence was obtained of 555 bp
after trimming the primer sequences and poor-read ends. The 28S D2 fragment was
amplified with the primers D23F (5′-GAG AGT TCA AGA GTA CGT G-3′) [17] and 28Sb (5′-TCG GAA
GGA ACC AGC TAC TA-3′) [18, 19].
After trimming the primer sequences and poor-read ends, the resulting contig
from 7 forward and 8 reverse sequences was 444 bp. All reactions were carried
out in 25 μl reaction volume containing 5 μl of template DNA, 2.5 μl of 10× PCR
buffer, 0.75 μl of 50 mM MgCl2, 0.2 μl dNTPs solution (25 mM each), 1.25 μl of
each primer (10 μM), 0.3 μl Taq polymerase (5u/μl Biotaq, Bioline), and PCR
grade water to final volume. The PCR cycle for the 5’ end of the standard
barcode region consisted of an initial denaturation step of 94°C for 2 min,
followed by 40 cycles of 94°C for 30 s, 40°C for 60 s and 72°C for 30 s, and a
final extension step of 10 min at 72°C. For the 3’ end of COI and for 28S the
conditions where similar except for annealing at 41°C for 50 s and 55°C for 30 s
respectively.Both DNA strands were sequenced at the Natural History Museum Life Sciences DNA
Sequencing Facility (London) using the same primers used for the PCR. Forward
and reverse sequences were assembled and corrected using Sequencher version 4.8.
Identical partial sequences were obtained for 8 individuals for 28S, and 3
individuals for CO1. These have been deposited in Genbank under accession nos
MN933670 (CO1) and MN934351 (28S), respectively.
Nomenclatural acts
The electronic edition of this article conforms to the requirements of the
amended International Code of Zoological Nomenclature, and hence the new names
contained herein are available under that Code from the electronic edition of
this article. This published work and the nomenclatural acts it contains have
been registered in ZooBank, the online registration system for the ICZN. The
ZooBank LSIDs (Life Science Identifiers) can be resolved and the associated
information viewed through any standard web browser by appending the LSID to the
prefix "http://zoobank.org/". The LSID for this
publication is:urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:E842825D-2E5A-47C4-AD7B-2A742D3347C8The electronic edition of this work was published in a journal with an ISSN, and
has been archived and is available from the following digital repositories:
PubMed Central, LOCKSS.
Description
Metaphycus Mercet
Metaphycus Mercet, 1917:138. Type species: Aphycus zebratus Mercet, by
monotypy, as subgenus of Aphycus Mayr.Metaphycus Mercet, 1925:28. Generic status.Synonyms include Aenasioidea Girault,
Aenigmaphycus Sharkov & Voynovich,
Anaphycus Sugonjaev, Erythraphycus
Compere, Euaphycus Mercet, Mercetiella
Dozier, Melanaphycus Compere, Mesaphycus
Sugonjaev, Notoencyrtus De Santis,
Ooaphycus Girault, Tyndarichoides
Girault and Xenaphycus Trjapitzin [20].
Diagnosis
Length 0.5–1.8 mm; robust and squat species, rarely slender and elongate;
body largely orange, yellow to brown or black (they may be shiny), never
with metallic lustre, antenna usually with black and white or yellow parts
or segments, fore wing hyaline to partially or uniformly infuscate, legs
yellowish or with brown to black segments, tibiae frequently with dark
rings. Head with occipital margin sharp, frequently with shallow grooves
lateral to outer margin of torulus; mandible mostly broad with 3 short,
subequal teeth, but occasionally slender with two or three unequal teeth.
Pronotum short, broadly triangular in dorsal view, mesoscutum wider than
long, notaular lines variable in length from virtually absent to complete
and reaching posterior margin; scutellum never with an apical flange that
overhangs the propodeum medially; fore wing generally about 2.5X as long as
broad and with uniform setation, submarginal vein reaching about half way
along wing, marginal and postmarginal veins very short, stigmal vein well
developed, longer than marginal and postmarginal veins together; linea calva
interrupted in posterior third by a few setae, or completely closed at this
point; mid tibial spur about as long as mid basitarsus, rarely significantly
shorter. Female: antenna almost always 11-segmented (1163),
rarely with clava 2- segmented; scape cylindrical to strongly expanded and
flattened. Gaster with hypopygium reaching half way along gaster to more or
less reaching its apex; outer plates of ovipositor not reflected upwards
posteriorly; gonostylus free, in most cases not exserted or only slightly
so. Male: generally darker and with more uniform colour in
respect to that of corresponding female. Antenna 9-segmented (1161), with
setae longer than in female; toruli very often with associated pores.
Comments
Females of Metaphycus that have the ovipositor slightly
exserted may be confused with Aphycus (Mayr). In
Aphycus, the linea calva of the fore wing is always
clearly entire and the outer plates of the ovipositor are reflected upward
posteriorly to connect loosely with the syntergum.
Distribution
Of the 466 described species of Metaphycus [21] three species are
more or less cosmopolitan (helvolus,
lounsburyi and flavus), 80 are
Afrotropical, 208 are Neotropical, 48 are Nearctic, 87 are Palaearctic
(including 53 from Europe), 26 are Oriental, and 23 are Australasian, with
several species being found in more than one region.
Hosts
Metaphycus species are mainly reported as solitary or
gregarious parasitoids of soft scales (Hemiptera: Coccidae) (e.g.
Coccus, Ceroplastes,
Saissetia spp.) and diaspidids (Hemiptera:
Diaspididae). A few species have been reported as parasitoids of kermesids
(Hemiptera: Kermococcidae), asterolecaniids (Hemiptera: Asterolecaniidae),
kerrids (Hemiptera: Kerridae), eriococcids (Hemiptera: Eriococcidae),
cerococcids (Hemiptera: Cerococcidae), mealybugs (Hemiptera:
Pseudococcidae), whiteflies (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) and triozids
(Hemiptera: Triozidae) [21].
Biocontrol
Species of the genus play an important role in the natural regulation of
scale insect pests, and as a result nearly 30 species have been released in
various parts of the world for control of soft scale (Hemiptera: Coccidae)
and armoured scale (Hemiptera: Diaspididae) pests of agriculture. The use of
Metaphycus species in biocontrol programmes has been
summarized [20, 22], and a detailed
compilation of data is available [21]. In general, the most successful
introductions have been from southern Africa into California for the control
of soft scale pests on Citrus with the best known of these
being the release of M. helvolus (Compere)
in 1937 for the control of Saissetia oleae (Olivier, 1791)
(Hemiptera: Coccidae). This has been estimated to have saved the California
citrus industry at least $70m prior to 1979, with an annual saving of over
$2m [23]. The same
species has proved to control successfully a number of
Saissetia spp. virtually everywhere it has been
released for pest control throughout the world.
Identification
Several keys have been published to the species of
Metaphycus: African species [24], South African species [25-27], Central Asian
species [28], Italian
species [29],
European species [20], Palaearctic species [30], Indian species [31], all of them based
on the distinction of species groups using the palp formula [32]. Some of these keys
are based largely on characters which may be unreliable (e.g. colour of
funicle segments, very small differences in relative width of scape) or
difficult to evaluate (e.g. relative length of frontovertex). Other
character states that may prove useful in the identification of species are
the presence or absence of subapical setae on the 2nd valvifer,
the presence or absence of lateral antennal grooves, the shape of the
antennal scrobes and the structure of the ovipositor and shape of the
hypopygium. Unfortunately, most of these characters can be observed only on
well prepared slide-mounted material which makes the reliable identification
of a number of species very difficult.
Female (holotype, Fig 1):
length, including ovipositor, 0.76mm, excluding ovipositor, 0.73mm (critical
point dried specimen).Colour: Head mostly white with occiput above foramen dark brown and gena with
a slightly elongate pale brown mark between base of mandible and eye; mouth
margin with a slender brown mark above base of mandible and another below
torulus; antenna (Fig 2)
with radicle white; scape white with a broad median band about half its
length on both inner and outer surfaces, connected ventrally but narrowly
separated dorsally; pedicel brown in proximal half, distal half white;
funicle with F1-F2 pale brown, F3 slightly paler, F4-F6 white; clava pale
brown in proximal half, apex pale yellow; pronotum white with paired
sublateral brown spots on posterior margin and a pair of larger submedian
subtriangular marks on neck; mesoscutum (Figs 5, 8 and 9) pale orange with posterior margin
narrowly dark brown adjacent to axilla; axilla and scutellum pale orange;
metanotum dusky pale orange; tegula translucent white, apex pale grey; side
and venter of thorax white; mesoscutum and scutellum clothed in numerous,
moderately long, translucent setae; coxae and legs white to very pale
yellow, mid and hind tibiae each with an extremely faint pale brown subbasal
ring; fore wing hyaline, venation pale yellow; propodeum medially pale
orange but pale orange-brown in lateral third towards spiracle, side white;
dorsum of gaster slightly dusky pale orange with syntergum white, side and
venter white; gonostylus white.
Fig 5
M. macadamiae female holotype,
dorsal mesosoma.
Fig 8
M. macadamiae female, lateral
habitus.
Fig 9
M. macadamiae female, dorsal
habitus.
Morphology: Head 3.5x as wide as fronovertex, slightly shiny on frontovertex,
sculpture coarse and fairly regularly reticulate, of mesh size hardly
smaller than eye facet; ocelli forming an angle of about 43°; antenna (Fig 2) with scape about
2.9X as long as broad; F1-F5 subequal and transverse but increasing very
slightly in width distad, F6 clearly longer and larger; funicle with linear
sensilla only on F6; clava apically rounded; eye slightly overreaching
occipital margin; upper temple rounded in facial view; frontovertex hardly
less than one-third head width, with inner eye margins diverging slightly
anteriorly, with narrowest point about level with posterior ocelli; scrobes
deep, U-shaped, meeting dorsally, interantennal prominence dorsally rounded;
lateral antennal groove absent; antennal torulus separated from mouth margin
by slightly less than its own length; mandible broad with three short, more
or less equal, acute teeth; palp formula 2–2. Relative measurements: HW 64,
FV 21, FVS 20, FVL 35, POL 7, AOL 10, OOL 1.5, OCL 2, POD 4, AOD 4, EL 36,
EW 29, MS 20, SL 28, SW 9.5.Thorax with notaular lines absent externally, but visible anterolaterally on
slide-mount; dorsum of thorax shiny with sculpture on mesoscutum similar to
that of frontovertex, but shallower and composed of smaller cells, sculpture
of scutellum about as deep as that on mesoscutum; side of propodeum more or
less naked; fore wing venation and setation as in Fig 3. Relative measurements: FWL 165,
FWW 66; HWL 110, HWW 21.Gaster with ovipositor slightly exserted, the exserted part about 0.15X as
long as gaster or 0.7X as long as mid tibial spur; gonostyli together
cylindrical and proximally about 2X as deep as diameter of base of mid
tibial spur; apex of last tergite shallowly rounded; hypopygium reaching
about 0.6X along gaster, broadly subtriangular and about 2X as broad as
long; second valvifer with 1 or 2 subapical setae. Relative measurements: OL
64, GL 13 [MT 58].Variation. The overall length of the female varies from about 0.63–0.78mm and
the head varies from about 3.0–3.6X as wide as the frontovertex.Male (Figs 10–13): length 0.46–0.66mm.
Structurally very similar to female except structure of antenna and
genitalia.
Fig 10
M. macadamiae male, lateral
habitus.
Colour: Head mostly pale orange with occiput above foramen dark brown;
frontovertex with a triangular brown mark delimited by occipital margin and
anterior ocellus; gena and temple pale pink with posterior margin brown from
base of mandible to about level of lower eye margin; mouth margin very
narrowly margined brown; scrobal area very pale yellow; antenna (Fig 12) with radicle
white; scape very pale yellow, almost white; pedicel brown in proximal half,
distal half off-white; flagellum pale brown; pronotum very pale yellow with
paired sublateral brown spots on posterior margin and a pair of larger
submedian subtriangular marks on neck; mesoscutum, axilla and scutellum
orange-brown; metanotum dusky orange; tegula white with apex brown; side and
venter of thorax white; mesoscutum and scutellum clothed in numerous,
moderately long, translucent pale brown setae; coxae and legs white to very
pale yellow, mid and hind tibiae each with an extremely faint pale brown
subbasal ring; fore wing hyaline, venation pale yellow; propodeum medially
pale orange but pale orange-brown in lateral third towards spiracle, side
white; dorsum of gaster orange-brown with syntergum slightly dusky pale
orange, side and venter white.
Fig 12
M. macadamiae male antenna, inner
and outer aspects.
Morphology: Head about 2.4–2.6X as wide as frontovertex with inner eye
margins diverging slightly anteriorly; antennal torulus with from 1 to 4,
widely spaced, associated pores along inner margin; antenna as in Fig 12 with scape about
2.7X as long as broad, F1-F5 anneliform, subequal, F6 largest and slightly
transverse, only F6 with linear sensilla. Phallobase (Fig 13) about as long as aedeagus with a
single subapical, seta on each side and each digitus with a single apical
hook; aedeagus about 0.5X as long as mid tibia. Relative measurements
(slide-mounted specimen): HW 61, FV 24, SL 22, MT 49.5, AL 23.5.A parasitoid of Acanthococcus ironsidei (Williams)
(Hemiptera: Eriococcidae) on Macadamia integrifolia Maiden
& Betche (Proteaceae).Australia (New South Wales), Hawaii (introduced).
Material examined
Holotype ♀, HAWAIIAN ISLANDS, Oahu, Pawaa, Hawaiian Dept. Agric. Insect
Containment Facility, May 14 2015, lab reared Eriococcus
ironsidei F18 generation (J. Yalemar), original collection
AUSTRALIA, NSW, Alstonville, ex Eriococcus ironsidei on
Macadamia integrifolia Tax. coll. #15–228;
19.xi.2013/26.xi.2013 and Tax. coll. #15–229 25.xi.2013/7.xii.2013 (M.
Ramadan). Paratypes: HAWAIIAN ISLANDS, 9♀, 9♂, same data as holotype.
Holotype in ANIC, paratypes in BMNH, BPBM and USNM.The female of Metaphycus macadamiae has a unique combination
of diagnostic characters in the genus: 2–2 palp formula; body generally
white to pale orange with occiput and pronotum marked dark brown; clava
proximally dark brown with apex pale yellow; head mostly white with occiput
above foramen dark brown and gena with a slightly elongate pale brown mark
between base of mandible and eye; scape white with a broad median band about
half its length on both inner and outer surfaces, connected ventrally but
narrowly separated dorsally; fore wing hyaline; legs white to very pale
yellow, mid and hind tibiae each with an extremely faint pale brown subbasal
ring; metanotum dusky pale orange; scape about 2.9X as long as broad;
funicle with linear sensilla only on F6; head 3.0–3.6X as wide as the
frontovertex; ovipositor about 5X as long as gonostylus.Of the 30 or so species of Metaphycus that have been reared
from Eriococcidae worldwide, only two belong to the alberti
species group (both maxillary and labial palps 2-segmented), i.e.
brachypterus (Mercet) and deluchii
Viggiani, both from Europe. These differ significantly from
macadamiae in having the mid and hind tibiae each with
a pair of distinct dark brown rings, the head about 4X as wide as the
frontovertex and the scape about 3.X as long as broad. Metaphycus
brachypterus also has the mouth margin and gena brown and
deluchii has linear sensilla on F5.Of the remaining species of Metaphycus belonging to the
alberti group, the most similar in general appearance
and habitus is helvolus Compere, females of both species
being generally yellow in appearance with the scape broadened and flattened
and mostly dark brown, apex of clava pale yellow, occiput and pronotum
marked dark brown, mid tibia with a faint brown subbasal ring, funicle with
linear sensilla only on F6, and male with pores scattered along inner margin
of torulus. The female of macadamiae differs from
helvolus in having a brown streak on the gena, and the
scape about 3X as long as broad, whereas in helvolus the
gena is completely pale yellow and the scape is 2.5X as long as broad. The
male of macadamiae differs from that of
helvolus in having fewer than five pores along the
inner margin of the torulus, and the funicle segments are nearly 2X as broad
as long, whereas in helvolus there are at least 10 pores
and the funicle segments are subquadrate.In the key to the Hawaiian Metaphycus species [33],
macadamiae runs to couplet 6 which includes "sp. near
claviger" and alberti (Howard). It
runs best to "sp. near claviger" because the scape is said
to be about 3X as long as broad whereas in alberti the
scape is said to be about 4X as long as broad (actually about 2.5X as long
as broad in claviger and 3X as long as broad in
alberti). As both alberti and
claviger are very similar to
macadamiae and probably originate from Australia,
macadamiae is compared to both below.Females of macadamiae differs from those of
alberti and claviger in being smaller,
generally less than 0.8mm long (mostly at least 1mm long in
alberti and claviger), having a pale
brown mark on gena (absent in alberti and
claviger), linear sensilla only on F6 (F5 and F6 in
alberti); head, side and venter of thorax white (orange
in alberti and claviger), mid and hind
tibiae each with a pale brown subbasal ring (legs immaculate in
alberti or claviger), head usually
about 3X as wide as the frontovertex (rarely as much as 3.6X, but at least
about 3.8X alberti or claviger) and
ovipositor slightly longer than mid tibia (about 0.8–0.9X as long in
alberti and claviger). Males differs
from those of alberti and claviger in
having the scape virtually uniformly white (pale orange with a distinct pale
brown median band in alberti and with dorsal and ventral
margins brown in claviger), from claviger
in having the gena pale pink (brown in claviger), from
alberti in having at most only 4 pores along inner
margin of torulus that do not extend past upper margin (at least 8 in
alberti some of which extend past upper margin) and
from claviger in having F6 strongly transverse, only about
0.6X as long as broad and only slightly larger than F5 (in
claviger subquadrate, nearly as long as broad and much
larger than F5).
Molecular analysis
The paucity of DNA sequences for Metaphycus species in
GenBank or elsewhere, coupled with the relative shortness of our sequences
have precluded the need for any phylogenetic or even phenetic analyses. A
Genbank BLAST of our 444 bp 28S ribosomal sequence suggests some proximity
to M. helvolus (assuming correct
identification), which is also suggested by morphology (see above). The top
8 similar sequences are all Metaphycus species.
M. helvolus in Genbank has 97% query
cover with 94% identical bases, suggesting quite some genetic distance. Our
555 bp COI contig of 6 sequences BLASTs to “Encyrtidae sp.” with 91% query
cover and 92% identity. It would appear that M macadamiae
is not closely related to any species with sequences currently deposited in
Genbank.
Comparison of Metaphycus macadamiae with
M. dispar (Mercet)
To the untrained eye, as was revealed during the review process of this
paper, some superficial similarity between M.
macadamiae and M.
dispar could be considered. The main and obvious
differences in their appearance are listed below. Also worthy of
consideration are the facts that M. dispar
is known only from Coccidae, is a Palaearctic species (introduced into
Califormia), and does not occur in Australia.M. dispar differs notably from
M. macadamiae in having linear
sensilla on F5; the gena and mouth margin lack brown marks; the notauli
reach almost reach half way down the mesoscutum. It is also distinctly paler
and in general larger.Other differences are as follows (the condition in M.
macadamiae is given first, with M.
dispar following in parentheses in red typeface):Female: Head mostly white (yellow/pale orange) with occiput above foramen
dark brown and gena with a slightly elongate pale brown mark between base of
mandible and eye (yellow/pale orange); mouth margin with a slender brown
mark above base of mandible and another below torulus (yellow/pale orange);
antenna with radicle white (brown); scape white with a broad median band
about half its length on both inner and outer surfaces, connected ventrally
but narrowly separated dorsally (continuous); mesoscutum pale orange (dark
orange); metanotum dusky pale orange; tegula translucent white, apex pale
grey; side and venter of thorax white (pale orange); mid and hind tibiae
each with an extremely faint pale brown subbasal ring (only mid tibia with
pale ring).Male: Antennal torulus with from 1 to 4, widely spaced, associated pores
along inner margin (cluster of c9 pores ventro-laterally); antenna with only
F6 with linear sensilla (F5+F6).
Discussion
Host specificity tests and biological studies in Hawaii will be published elsewhere
when nomenclature of this parasitoid is officially published. We anticipate that
M. macadamiae will be a useful agent in the
biocontrol programmes against MFC in Hawaii and South Africa. In April 2017 severe
infestations of MFC were observed in the Barberton valley in Mpumalanga, South
Africa. The impact of this new pest on the local macadamia industry may take some
years to reach the infestation level in Hawaii. However, it is an important
quarantine organism and researchers are advocating care to prevent the movement of
infested plant material to reduce the risk of spreading the pest amongst orchards.
Although it was initially thought the infestation was contained in Barberton where
the pest was first found, it spread within a month to White River plantations about
63 Km north of Barberton, presumably through infested plant material.Spread in Hawaii is relatively slow, and the scale tends to stay in the same tree.
But observations in White River contradict this as there was considerable spread to
adjoining trees. South African Entomologists are waiting for the release of
M. macadamiae in Hawaii to get a starter
colony for their studies (https://macadamiasa.co.za/2019/02/19/beware-the-felted-coccid/.(AVI)Click here for additional data file.(AVI)Click here for additional data file.
Authors: Konrad Lohse; Barbara Sharanowski; Mark Blaxter; James A Nicholls; Graham N Stone Journal: Mol Ecol Resour Date: 2010-12-20 Impact factor: 7.090
Authors: Hannes Baur; Yvonne Kranz-Baltensperger; Astrid Cruaud; Jean-Yves Rasplus; Alexander V Timokhov; Vladimir E Gokhman Journal: Syst Entomol Date: 2014-06-12 Impact factor: 3.844