Literature DB >> 32267588

Impact of health warning labels communicating the risk of cancer on alcohol selection: an online experimental study.

Natasha Clarke1, Emily Pechey1, Eleni Mantzari1, Anna K M Blackwell2, Katie De-Loyde2, Richard W Morris3, Marcus R Munafò2, Theresa M Marteau1, Gareth J Hollands1.   

Abstract

AIMS: Evidence from tobacco research suggests that health warning labels (HWLs) depicting the adverse consequences of consumption change smoking behaviours, with image-and-text (also known as 'pictorial' or 'graphic') HWLs most effective. There is an absence of evidence concerning the potential impact of HWLs placed on alcohol products on selection of those products. This study aimed to obtain a preliminary assessment of the possible impact of (i) image-and-text, (ii) text-only, and (iii) image-only HWLs on selection of alcoholic versus non-alcoholic drinks.
DESIGN: A between-subjects randomised experiment with a 2 (image: present versus absent) × 2 (text: present versus absent) factorial design.
SETTING: The study was conducted on the online survey platform Qualtrics. PARTICIPANTS: Participants (n = 6024) were adults over the age of 18 who consumed beer or wine regularly (i.e. at least once a week), recruited through a market research agency.
INTERVENTIONS: Participants were randomised to one of four groups varying in the HWL displayed on the packaging of alcoholic drinks: (i) image-and-text HWL; (ii) text-only HWL; (iii) image-only HWL; and (iv) no HWL. HWLs depicted bowel cancer, breast cancer and liver cancer, which were each displayed twice across six alcoholic drinks. Each group viewed six alcoholic and six non-alcoholic drinks and selected one drink that they would like to consume. MEASUREMENTS: The primary outcome was the proportion of participants selecting an alcoholic versus a non-alcoholic drink.
FINDINGS: Alcoholic drink selection was lower for all HWL types compared with no HWL (image-and-text: 56%; image-only: 49%; text-only: 61%; no HWL: 77%), with selection lowest for HWLs that included an image. Image-and-text HWLs reduced the odds of selecting an alcoholic drink compared with text-only HWLs (OR = 0.80, 95% CI = 0.69, 0.92), but increased the odds of selecting an alcoholic drink compared with image-only HWLs (OR = 1.34, 95% CI = 1.16, 1.55).
CONCLUSIONS: Health warning labels communicating the increased risk of cancers associated with alcohol consumption reduced selection of alcoholic versus non-alcoholic drinks in a hypothetical choice task in an online setting; labels displaying images had the largest effect. Their impact in laboratory and real-world field settings using physical products awaits investigation.
© 2020 The Authors. Addiction published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society for the Study of Addiction.

Entities:  

Keywords:  alcohol; cancer; choice architecture; graphic warnings; health warning label; pictorial health warning label

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32267588     DOI: 10.1111/add.15072

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Addiction        ISSN: 0965-2140            Impact factor:   6.526


  9 in total

1.  Alcohol product warning labels to deter alcohol misuse and prevent alcohol-related diseases: a call to action in Canada.

Authors:  Man Ting Kristina Yau; Natasha Chandok; Eric M Yoshida
Journal:  Can Liver J       Date:  2021-04-29

Review 2.  A Narrative Review of the Efficacy and Design of Safety Labels on Tobacco Products to Promote the Use of Safety Labels on Alcohol Products in Canada.

Authors:  Man Ting Kristina Yau; Kiana W Yau; Trana Hussaini; Eric M Yoshida
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-05-24

3.  Effect of health warning labels on motivation towards energy-dense snack foods: Two experimental studies.

Authors:  Minna Ventsel; Emily Pechey; Katie De-Loyde; Mark A Pilling; Richard W Morris; Giulia Maistrello; Hisham Ziauddeen; Theresa M Marteau; Gareth J Hollands; Paul C Fletcher
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2022-05-14       Impact factor: 5.016

4.  Impact of health warning labels on snack selection: An online experimental study.

Authors:  Natasha Clarke; Emily Pechey; Eleni Mantzari; Anna K M Blackwell; Katie De-Loyde; Richard W Morris; Marcus R Munafò; Theresa M Marteau; Gareth J Hollands
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2020-06-18       Impact factor: 3.868

5.  Effects of pairing health warning labels with energy-dense snack foods on food choice and attitudes: Online experimental study.

Authors:  Stephanie C M Asbridge; Emily Pechey; Theresa M Marteau; Gareth J Hollands
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2020-12-26       Impact factor: 3.868

6.  How health warning labels on wine and vodka bottles influence perceived risk, rejection, and acceptance.

Authors:  Cornelia Staub; Michael Siegrist
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2022-01-24       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 7.  Alcohol Health Warning Labels: A Rapid Review with Action Recommendations.

Authors:  Norman Giesbrecht; Emilene Reisdorfer; Isabelle Rios
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-09-16       Impact factor: 4.614

8.  Health information and warnings on alcohol packaging in Ireland: it is time to progress the Public Health (Alcohol) Act 2018.

Authors:  Nathan Critchlow; Crawford Moodie; Daniel Jones
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2021-07-28       Impact factor: 2.089

9.  Impact of health warning labels on selection and consumption of food and alcohol products: systematic review with meta-analysis.

Authors:  Natasha Clarke; Emily Pechey; Daina Kosīte; Laura M König; Eleni Mantzari; Anna K M Blackwell; Theresa M Marteau; Gareth J Hollands
Journal:  Health Psychol Rev       Date:  2020-07-02
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.