Literature DB >> 32267558

The impact of deep convolutional neural network-based artificial intelligence on colonoscopy outcomes: A systematic review with meta-analysis.

Muhammad Aziz1, Rawish Fatima1, Charles Dong1, Wade Lee-Smith2, Ali Nawras3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM: The utility of artificial intelligence (AI) in colonoscopy has gained popularity in current times. Recent trials have evaluated the efficacy of deep convolutional neural network (DCNN)-based AI system in colonoscopy for improving adenoma detection rate (ADR) and polyp detection rate (PDR). We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of the available studies to assess the impact of DCNN-based AI-assisted colonoscopy in improving the ADR and PDR.
METHODS: We queried the following database for this study: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Sciences, and Computers and Applied Sciences. We only included randomized controlled trials that compared AI colonoscopy to standard colonoscopy (SC). Our outcomes included ADR and PDR. Risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated using random effects model and DerSimonian-Laird approach for each outcome.
RESULTS: A total of three studies with 2815 patients (1415 in SC group and 1400 in AI group) were included. AI colonoscopy resulted in significantly improved ADR (32.9% vs 20.8%, RR: 1.58, 95% CI 1.39-1.80, P = < 0.001) and PDR (43.0% vs 27.8%, RR: 1.55, 95% CI 1.39-1.72, P = < 0.001) compared with SC.
CONCLUSION: Given the results and limitations, the utility of AI colonoscopy holds promise and should be evaluated in more randomized controlled trials across different population, especially in patients solely undergoing colonoscopy for screening purpose as improved ADR will ultimately help in reducing incident colorectal cancer.
© 2020 Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Foundation and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  artificial intelligence; colonoscopy; deep convolutional neural network; high-definition

Year:  2020        PMID: 32267558     DOI: 10.1111/jgh.15070

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastroenterol Hepatol        ISSN: 0815-9319            Impact factor:   4.029


  16 in total

1.  Does i-scan improve adenoma detection rate compared to high-definition colonoscopy? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Muhammad Aziz; Zohaib Ahmed; Hossein Haghbin; Asad Pervez; Hemant Goyal; Faisal Kamal; Abdallah Kobeissy; Ali Nawras; Douglas G Adler
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2022-06-10

2.  Real-time computer aided colonoscopy versus standard colonoscopy for improving adenoma detection rate: A meta-analysis of randomized-controlled trials.

Authors:  Babu P Mohan; Antonio Facciorusso; Shahab R Khan; Saurabh Chandan; Lena L Kassab; Paraskevas Gkolfakis; Georgios Tziatzios; Konstantinos Triantafyllou; Douglas G Adler
Journal:  EClinicalMedicine       Date:  2020-11-21

Review 3.  Efficacy of Endocuff Vision compared to first-generation Endocuff in adenoma detection rate and polyp detection rate in high-definition colonoscopy: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Muhammad Aziz; Hossein Haghbin; Manesh Kumar Gangwani; Sachit Sharma; Yusuf Nawras; Zubair Khan; Saurabh Chandan; Babu P Mohan; Wade Lee-Smith; Ali Nawras
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2021-01-01

Review 4.  Evolving role of artificial intelligence in gastrointestinal endoscopy.

Authors:  Gulshan Parasher; Morgan Wong; Manmeet Rawat
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-12-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 5.  A review of water exchange and artificial intelligence in improving adenoma detection.

Authors:  Chia-Pei Tang; Paul P Shao; Yu-Hsi Hsieh; Felix W Leung
Journal:  Tzu Chi Med J       Date:  2020-10-05

Review 6.  Large polyps: Pearls for the referring and receiving endoscopist.

Authors:  Eric Markarian; Brian M Fung; Mohit Girotra; James H Tabibian
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2021-12-16

7.  Artificial Intelligence-Aid Colonoscopy Vs. Conventional Colonoscopy for Polyp and Adenoma Detection: A Systematic Review of 7 Discordant Meta-Analyses.

Authors:  Hui Pan; Mingyan Cai; Qi Liao; Yong Jiang; Yige Liu; Xiaolong Zhuang; Ying Yu
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-01-13

8.  Research on the Path of Network Opinion Expression in AI Environment for College Students.

Authors:  Yue Zhu; Muhammad Talha
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2021-12-06       Impact factor: 2.238

Review 9.  Clinical impact and quality of randomized controlled trials involving interventions evaluating artificial intelligence prediction tools: a systematic review.

Authors:  Qian Zhou; Zhi-Hang Chen; Yi-Heng Cao; Sui Peng
Journal:  NPJ Digit Med       Date:  2021-10-28

Review 10.  Application of Artificial Intelligence in the Detection and Characterization of Colorectal Neoplasm.

Authors:  Kyeong Ok Kim; Eun Young Kim
Journal:  Gut Liver       Date:  2021-05-15       Impact factor: 4.519

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.