Literature DB >> 32267083

The Age of Data-Driven Proteomics: How Machine Learning Enables Novel Workflows.

Robbin Bouwmeester1,2, Ralf Gabriels1,2, Tim Van Den Bossche1,2, Lennart Martens1,2, Sven Degroeve1,2.   

Abstract

A lot of energy in the field of proteomics is dedicated to the application of challenging experimental workflows, which include metaproteomics, proteogenomics, data independent acquisition (DIA), non-specific proteolysis, immunopeptidomics, and open modification searches. These workflows are all challenging because of ambiguity in the identification stage; they either expand the search space and thus increase the ambiguity of identifications, or, in the case of DIA, they generate data that is inherently more ambiguous. In this context, machine learning-based predictive models are now generating considerable excitement in the field of proteomics because these predictive models hold great potential to drastically reduce the ambiguity in the identification process of the above-mentioned workflows. Indeed, the field has already produced classical machine learning and deep learning models to predict almost every aspect of a liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) experiment. Yet despite all the excitement, thorough integration of predictive models in these challenging LC-MS workflows is still limited, and further improvements to the modeling and validation procedures can still be made. In this viewpoint we therefore point out highly promising recent machine learning developments in proteomics, alongside some of the remaining challenges. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  data driven modeling; deep learning; machine learning

Year:  2020        PMID: 32267083     DOI: 10.1002/pmic.201900351

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proteomics        ISSN: 1615-9853            Impact factor:   3.984


  7 in total

1.  Implementing the reuse of public DIA proteomics datasets: from the PRIDE database to Expression Atlas.

Authors:  Mathias Walzer; David García-Seisdedos; Ananth Prakash; Paul Brack; Peter Crowther; Robert L Graham; Nancy George; Suhaib Mohammed; Pablo Moreno; Irene Papatheodorou; Simon J Hubbard; Juan Antonio Vizcaíno
Journal:  Sci Data       Date:  2022-06-14       Impact factor: 8.501

2.  Personalized Proteome: Comparing Proteogenomics and Open Variant Search Approaches for Single Amino Acid Variant Detection.

Authors:  Renee Salz; Robbin Bouwmeester; Ralf Gabriels; Sven Degroeve; Lennart Martens; Pieter-Jan Volders; Peter A C 't Hoen
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2021-05-17       Impact factor: 4.466

3.  Multichannel CNN Model for Biomedical Entity Reorganization.

Authors:  Ajay Kumar Singh; Ihtiram Raza Khan; Shakir Khan; Kumud Pant; Sandip Debnath; Shahajan Miah
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2022-03-19       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  Critical Assessment of MetaProteome Investigation (CAMPI): a multi-laboratory comparison of established workflows.

Authors:  Tim Van Den Bossche; Benoit J Kunath; Kay Schallert; Stephanie S Schäpe; Paul E Abraham; Jean Armengaud; Magnus Ø Arntzen; Ariane Bassignani; Dirk Benndorf; Stephan Fuchs; Richard J Giannone; Timothy J Griffin; Live H Hagen; Rashi Halder; Céline Henry; Robert L Hettich; Robert Heyer; Pratik Jagtap; Nico Jehmlich; Marlene Jensen; Catherine Juste; Manuel Kleiner; Olivier Langella; Theresa Lehmann; Emma Leith; Patrick May; Bart Mesuere; Guylaine Miotello; Samantha L Peters; Olivier Pible; Pedro T Queiros; Udo Reichl; Bernhard Y Renard; Henning Schiebenhoefer; Alexander Sczyrba; Alessandro Tanca; Kathrin Trappe; Jean-Pierre Trezzi; Sergio Uzzau; Pieter Verschaffelt; Martin von Bergen; Paul Wilmes; Maximilian Wolf; Lennart Martens; Thilo Muth
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-12-15       Impact factor: 14.919

5.  A comprehensive LFQ benchmark dataset on modern day acquisition strategies in proteomics.

Authors:  Bart Van Puyvelde; Simon Daled; Sander Willems; Ralf Gabriels; Anne Gonzalez de Peredo; Karima Chaoui; Emmanuelle Mouton-Barbosa; David Bouyssié; Kurt Boonen; Christopher J Hughes; Lee A Gethings; Yasset Perez-Riverol; Nic Bloomfield; Stephen Tate; Odile Schiltz; Lennart Martens; Dieter Deforce; Maarten Dhaenens
Journal:  Sci Data       Date:  2022-03-30       Impact factor: 6.444

Review 6.  Deep learning neural network tools for proteomics.

Authors:  Jesse G Meyer
Journal:  Cell Rep Methods       Date:  2021-05-17

7.  Cov-MS: A Community-Based Template Assay for Mass-Spectrometry-Based Protein Detection in SARS-CoV-2 Patients.

Authors:  Bart Van Puyvelde; Katleen Van Uytfanghe; Olivier Tytgat; Laurence Van Oudenhove; Ralf Gabriels; Robbin Bouwmeester; Simon Daled; Tim Van Den Bossche; Pathmanaban Ramasamy; Sigrid Verhelst; Laura De Clerck; Laura Corveleyn; Sander Willems; Nathan Debunne; Evelien Wynendaele; Bart De Spiegeleer; Peter Judak; Kris Roels; Laurie De Wilde; Peter Van Eenoo; Tim Reyns; Marc Cherlet; Emmie Dumont; Griet Debyser; Ruben t'Kindt; Koen Sandra; Surya Gupta; Nicolas Drouin; Amy Harms; Thomas Hankemeier; Donald J L Jones; Pankaj Gupta; Dan Lane; Catherine S Lane; Said El Ouadi; Jean-Baptiste Vincendet; Nick Morrice; Stuart Oehrle; Nikunj Tanna; Steve Silvester; Sally Hannam; Florian C Sigloch; Andrea Bhangu-Uhlmann; Jan Claereboudt; N Leigh Anderson; Morteza Razavi; Sven Degroeve; Lize Cuypers; Christophe Stove; Katrien Lagrou; Geert A Martens; Dieter Deforce; Lennart Martens; Johannes P C Vissers; Maarten Dhaenens
Journal:  JACS Au       Date:  2021-05-03
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.