Madlaina Schöni1, Felix W A Waibel2, David Bauer2, Tobias Götschi3, Thomas Böni2, Martin C Berli2. 1. Division of Technical Orthopedics, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Balgrist University Hospital, Forchstrasse 340, 8008, Zurich, Switzerland. madlaina.schoeni@balgrist.ch. 2. Division of Technical Orthopedics, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Balgrist University Hospital, Forchstrasse 340, 8008, Zurich, Switzerland. 3. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Institute for Biomechanics, University of Zurich, ETH Zurich, Balgrist Campus, Zurich, Switzerland.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Internal partial forefoot amputation (IPFA) is a treatment option for osteomyelitis and refractory and recurrent chronic ulcers of the forefoot. The aim of our study was to assess the healing rate of chronic ulcers, risk of ulcer recurrence at the same area or re-ulceration at a different area and revision rate in patients treated with IPFA. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients who underwent IPFA of a phalanx and/or metatarsal head and/or sesamoids at our institution because of chronic ulceration of the forefoot and/or osteomyelitis from 2004 to 2014 were included. Information about patient characteristics, ulcer healing, new ulcer occurrence, and revision surgery were collected. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were plotted for new ulcer occurrence and revision surgery. RESULTS: A total of 102 patients were included (108 operated feet). 55.6% of our patients had diabetes. In 44 cases, an IPFA of a phalanx was performed, in 60 cases a metatarsal head resection and in 4 cases an isolated resection of sesamoids. The mean follow-up was 40.9 months. 91.2% of ulcers healed after a mean period of 1.3 months. In 56 feet (51.9%), a new ulcer occurred: 11 feet (10.2%) had an ulcer in the same area as initially (= ulcer recurrence), in 45 feet (41.7%) the ulcer was localized elsewhere (= re-ulceration). Revision surgery was necessary in 39 feet (36.1%). Only one major amputation and five complete transmetatarsal forefoot amputations were necessary during the follow-up period. Thus, the major amputation rate was 0.9%, and the minor amputation rate on the same ray was 13.9%. CONCLUSIONS: IPFA is a valuable treatment of chronic ulcers of the forefoot. However, new ulceration is a frequent event following this type of surgery. Our results are consistent with the reported re-ulceration rate after conservative treatment of diabetic foot ulcers. The number of major amputations is low after IPFA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Retrospective Case Series Study (Level IV).
INTRODUCTION: Internal partial forefoot amputation (IPFA) is a treatment option for osteomyelitis and refractory and recurrent chronic ulcers of the forefoot. The aim of our study was to assess the healing rate of chronic ulcers, risk of ulcer recurrence at the same area or re-ulceration at a different area and revision rate in patients treated with IPFA. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients who underwent IPFA of a phalanx and/or metatarsal head and/or sesamoids at our institution because of chronic ulceration of the forefoot and/or osteomyelitis from 2004 to 2014 were included. Information about patient characteristics, ulcer healing, new ulcer occurrence, and revision surgery were collected. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were plotted for new ulcer occurrence and revision surgery. RESULTS: A total of 102 patients were included (108 operated feet). 55.6% of our patients had diabetes. In 44 cases, an IPFA of a phalanx was performed, in 60 cases a metatarsal head resection and in 4 cases an isolated resection of sesamoids. The mean follow-up was 40.9 months. 91.2% of ulcers healed after a mean period of 1.3 months. In 56 feet (51.9%), a new ulcer occurred: 11 feet (10.2%) had an ulcer in the same area as initially (= ulcer recurrence), in 45 feet (41.7%) the ulcer was localized elsewhere (= re-ulceration). Revision surgery was necessary in 39 feet (36.1%). Only one major amputation and five complete transmetatarsal forefoot amputations were necessary during the follow-up period. Thus, the major amputation rate was 0.9%, and the minor amputation rate on the same ray was 13.9%. CONCLUSIONS:IPFA is a valuable treatment of chronic ulcers of the forefoot. However, new ulceration is a frequent event following this type of surgery. Our results are consistent with the reported re-ulceration rate after conservative treatment of diabetic foot ulcers. The number of major amputations is low after IPFA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Retrospective Case Series Study (Level IV).
Authors: L Norgren; W R Hiatt; J A Dormandy; M R Nehler; K A Harris; F G R Fowkes; Kevin Bell; Joseph Caporusso; Isabelle Durand-Zaleski; Kimihiro Komori; Johannes Lammer; Christos Liapis; Salvatore Novo; Mahmood Razavi; Johns Robbs; Nicholaas Schaper; Hiroshi Shigematsu; Marc Sapoval; Christopher White; John White; Denis Clement; Mark Creager; Michael Jaff; Emile Mohler; Robert B Rutherford; Peter Sheehan; Henrik Sillesen; Kenneth Rosenfield Journal: Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg Date: 2006-11-29 Impact factor: 7.069
Authors: B T Lipman; B D Collier; G F Carrera; M E Timins; S J Erickson; J E Johnson; J R Mitchell; R G Hoffmann; W A Finger; A Z Krasnow; R S Hellman Journal: Clin Nucl Med Date: 1998-02 Impact factor: 7.794
Authors: Irene Sanz-Corbalán; José Luis Lázaro-Martínez; Javier Aragón-Sánchez; Esther García-Morales; Raúl Molines-Barroso; Francisco Javier Alvaro-Afonso Journal: Int J Low Extrem Wounds Date: 2015-06-29 Impact factor: 2.057
Authors: F J Aragón-Sánchez; J J Cabrera-Galván; Y Quintana-Marrero; M J Hernández-Herrero; J L Lázaro-Martínez; E García-Morales; J V Beneit-Montesinos; D G Armstrong Journal: Diabetologia Date: 2008-08-22 Impact factor: 10.122
Authors: Thenmalar Vadiveloo; William Jeffcoate; Peter T Donnan; Helen C Colhoun; Stuart McGurnaghan; Sarah Wild; Rory McCrimmon; Graham P Leese Journal: Diabetologia Date: 2018-08-31 Impact factor: 10.122
Authors: Claire M Buckley; Anne O'Farrell; Ronan J Canavan; Anthony D Lynch; Davida V De La Harpe; Colin P Bradley; Ivan J Perry Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-07-31 Impact factor: 3.240