Literature DB >> 32266467

CRISPR deletion of the C9ORF72 promoter in ALS/FTD patient motor neurons abolishes production of dipeptide repeat proteins and rescues neurodegeneration.

Gopinath Krishnan1, Yu Zhang1,2, Yuanzheng Gu3, Mark W Kankel3, Fen-Biao Gao4, Sandra Almeida5.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32266467      PMCID: PMC7300081          DOI: 10.1007/s00401-020-02154-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Neuropathol        ISSN: 0001-6322            Impact factor:   15.887


× No keyword cloud information.
GGGGCC (G4C2) repeat expansion in the first intron of C9ORF72 is the most common genetic cause of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and frontotemporal dementia (FTD) [6, 11]. Brain tissues from affected individuals show characteristic nuclear RNA foci containing the expanded repeat RNAs, as well as neuronal inclusions containing dipeptide repeat (DPR) proteins [poly(GA), poly(GP), poly(GR), poly(PR), and poly(PA)] resulting from the translation of both sense and antisense repeat RNAs in all reading frames [4, 9, 14]. Although reduced C9ORF72 protein function may contribute to disease [10], the more likely drivers of disease are mechanisms related to a gain of toxic function [7]. Currently, intense efforts are being made to identify disease mechanisms amenable for the development of therapeutic strategies. One promising avenue would be to prevent the production of the expanded repeat RNAs, such as by antisense oligonucleotides [5]. Here, we tested another potential therapeutic approach: CRISPR/Cas9-based targeting of the promoter region. In ALS and FTD patients, transcription initiated at exon-1a of C9ORF72 generates RNA species containing G4C2 repeat expansions that are in turn translated into three DPR proteins, poly(GA), poly(GP), and poly(GR). Thus, we first used reporter constructs to identify the promoter sequence 5′ to exon-1a that is responsible for transcription initiation of expanded repeat RNA. We cloned the 435 nucleotides (nt) upstream of the predicted transcription initiation site, as well as several truncated fragments of the 435-nt sequence, into a luciferase reporter vector (Fig. 1a) and expressed all the constructs in HEK293 cells. Deletion of the first 301 nt did not reduce the relative expression of the reporter gene. However, deleting the remaining 134 nt abolished luciferase expression (Fig. 1a), indicating that the core promoter elements are located in this region. To further characterize this sequence, we also tested a construct lacking the first 394 nt and one lacking the remaining 41 nt. Each of these deletions reduced the relative luciferase expression, indicating that both constructs lacked a portion of sequence required for reporter gene expression (Fig. 1a). These experiments indicate that the last 134 nt sequence contains the minimal promoter necessary to drive expression of G4C2 repeat-containing C9ORF72 transcripts.
Fig. 1

Deletion of the C9ORF72 promoter region. a Schematic of the different promoter deletions analyzed in the luciferase reporter assay and quantification of the relative expression of firefly luciferase (FLuc)/renilla luciferase (RLuc) in HEK293 cells (n = 3 independent transfections). b Schematic of the C9ORF72 locus in parental and promoter deletion iPSC-derived neurons. Arrows indicate the site of transcription initiation for the different variants. Only variants containing exon 1a are expected to be affected by the deletion; the variant containing exon 1b is predicted to use a different promoter. c CRISPR-edited iPSC lines are homozygous for the 140-bp deletion as indicated by the PCR analysis. d–f Four-week-old motor neurons from parental and promoter deletion lines were analyzed for expression of C9ORF72-V3, C9ORF72-V2, and C9ORF72-antisense RNAs (n = 3 independent differentiations). g C9ORF72 protein levels in 4-week-old parental and promoter deletion motor neurons (n = 3 independent differentiations). Values are mean ± SEM. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 (a, e–g, one-way ANOVA; d, Welch’s t test). ns not significant

Deletion of the C9ORF72 promoter region. a Schematic of the different promoter deletions analyzed in the luciferase reporter assay and quantification of the relative expression of firefly luciferase (FLuc)/renilla luciferase (RLuc) in HEK293 cells (n = 3 independent transfections). b Schematic of the C9ORF72 locus in parental and promoter deletion iPSC-derived neurons. Arrows indicate the site of transcription initiation for the different variants. Only variants containing exon 1a are expected to be affected by the deletion; the variant containing exon 1b is predicted to use a different promoter. c CRISPR-edited iPSC lines are homozygous for the 140-bp deletion as indicated by the PCR analysis. d–f Four-week-old motor neurons from parental and promoter deletion lines were analyzed for expression of C9ORF72-V3, C9ORF72-V2, and C9ORF72-antisense RNAs (n = 3 independent differentiations). g C9ORF72 protein levels in 4-week-old parental and promoter deletion motor neurons (n = 3 independent differentiations). Values are mean ± SEM. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 (a, e–g, one-way ANOVA; d, Welch’s t test). ns not significant To investigate how this deletion affects the production of RNAs containing G4C2 repeat expansions in C9ORF72 human neurons, we used CRISPR-Cas9 technology to generate a similar deletion 5′ to exon-1a of C9ORF72 in an induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC) line containing ~ 1000 copies of the G4C2 repeats [2] (Figs. 1b, c; S1). We selected two iPSC lines containing the promoter deletion and differentiated them and the parental iPSC line into ChAT-positive motor neurons (see Suppl. Information). As expected, the promoter deletion eliminated the expression of C9ORF72-Variant 3 (V3), whose transcription starts on exon-1a (Fig. 1b, d). In contrast, the RNA level of C9ORF72-V2, whose translation starts on exon 1b, or the expression of C9ORF72-antisense RNA, was not significantly affected (Fig. 1e–f), consistent with the fact that these transcripts have their own promoters [6]. In iPSCs and motor neurons harboring the promoter deletion, we detected a reduction in the levels of full-length C9ORF72 protein (Figs. 1g; S2), likely due to loss of C9ORF72-V3 expression. Since RNAs containing the G4C2 repeat expansion lead to the production of DPR proteins, we next measured DPR protein levels in parental and promoter deletion motor neuron cultures using Meso Scale Discovery immunoassays. We found that expression of poly(GA), poly(GP), and poly(GR) was almost completely abolished in the motor neuron cultures harboring the promoter deletion (Fig. 2a–c). We then examined the functional consequence of reducing DPR levels in these neurons, using axonal degeneration as our scoring metric as we reported recently [12]. Deletion of the promoter region prevented the increase in axonal degeneration of parental motor neurons upon withdrawal of neurotrophic factors for 2 weeks (Figs. 2d, e; S3), a phenotype we previously described in neurons differentiated from two pairs of isogenic C9ORF72 iPSC lines [12]. The promoter deletion also prevented upregulation of the expression of the heat shock protein HSPA1B mRNA (Fig. 2f), a phenotype detected in ALS/FTD patient brain tissues and C9ORF72 iPSC-derived motor neurons [3, 8].
Fig. 2

Effects of C9ORF72 promoter deletion in iPSC-derived neurons. a–c Poly(GA), poly(GP), and poly(GR) levels in 1.5-month-old parental neurons, neurons without repeats, and promoter deletion motor neurons (n = 3 independent differentiations) were measured with Meso Scale Discovery immunoassays. The poly(GA) assay was done in a blinded manner at Biogen. d Representative immunofluorescence images of the axonal degeneration assay done with the marker βΙΙΙ-tubulin (TUJ1+), which revealed swollen varicosities and axonal fragments. Arrowheads indicate fragmented axons. e Axonal degeneration assessed by measuring the ratio of fragmented axons over the total TUJ1+ area 2 weeks after withdrawal of neurotrophic factors. Six to eight randomly selected fields were analyzed for each condition and each neuronal culture. Each independent data point represents one field, (n = 3 independent differentiations). f Relative expression of HSPA1B in 10-week-old motor neuron cultures (n = 3 independent differentiations). Values are mean ± SEM. *p < 0.05, ***p < 0.001 (one-way ANOVA, Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test)

Effects of C9ORF72 promoter deletion in iPSC-derived neurons. a–c Poly(GA), poly(GP), and poly(GR) levels in 1.5-month-old parental neurons, neurons without repeats, and promoter deletion motor neurons (n = 3 independent differentiations) were measured with Meso Scale Discovery immunoassays. The poly(GA) assay was done in a blinded manner at Biogen. d Representative immunofluorescence images of the axonal degeneration assay done with the marker βΙΙΙ-tubulin (TUJ1+), which revealed swollen varicosities and axonal fragments. Arrowheads indicate fragmented axons. e Axonal degeneration assessed by measuring the ratio of fragmented axons over the total TUJ1+ area 2 weeks after withdrawal of neurotrophic factors. Six to eight randomly selected fields were analyzed for each condition and each neuronal culture. Each independent data point represents one field, (n = 3 independent differentiations). f Relative expression of HSPA1B in 10-week-old motor neuron cultures (n = 3 independent differentiations). Values are mean ± SEM. *p < 0.05, ***p < 0.001 (one-way ANOVA, Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test) Our results indicate that deletion of the 134 nt minimal promoter 5′ to exon-1a in C9ORF72 prevents both the production of sense RNAs containing expanded G4C2 repeats and the activation of downstream neurodegeneration pathways. These findings also suggest that sense repeat RNA and its translation products are responsible for the observed neurodegenerative phenotypes, at least in this experimental system. The promoter deletion also partially decreased C9ORF72 protein levels. However, in the absence of DPR proteins, loss of C9ORF72 does not cause neurodegeneration in mice or iPSC-derived motor neurons [1, 10]. Improved versions of the CRISPR interference are now being tested in vivo to silence gene transcription without cutting genomic DNA [13]. Thus, our proof-of-concept study suggests that CRISPR/Cas9-based targeting of the promoter region to eliminate sense repeat RNA and its toxic translation products may be a potentially useful therapeutic approach for C9ORF72-ALS/FTD, especially before significant accumulation of DPR proteins. Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material. Supplementary file1 (PDF 807 kb)
  14 in total

1.  Unconventional translation of C9ORF72 GGGGCC expansion generates insoluble polypeptides specific to c9FTD/ALS.

Authors:  Peter E A Ash; Kevin F Bieniek; Tania F Gendron; Thomas Caulfield; Wen-Lang Lin; Mariely Dejesus-Hernandez; Marka M van Blitterswijk; Karen Jansen-West; Joseph W Paul; Rosa Rademakers; Kevin B Boylan; Dennis W Dickson; Leonard Petrucelli
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2013-02-12       Impact factor: 17.173

2.  C9orf72 is required for proper macrophage and microglial function in mice.

Authors:  J G O'Rourke; L Bogdanik; A Yáñez; D Lall; A J Wolf; A K M G Muhammad; R Ho; S Carmona; J P Vit; J Zarrow; K J Kim; S Bell; M B Harms; T M Miller; C A Dangler; D M Underhill; H S Goodridge; C M Lutz; R H Baloh
Journal:  Science       Date:  2016-03-18       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  RAN proteins and RNA foci from antisense transcripts in C9ORF72 ALS and frontotemporal dementia.

Authors:  Tao Zu; Yuanjing Liu; Monica Bañez-Coronel; Tammy Reid; Olga Pletnikova; Jada Lewis; Timothy M Miller; Matthew B Harms; Annet E Falchook; S H Subramony; Lyle W Ostrow; Jeffrey D Rothstein; Juan C Troncoso; Laura P W Ranum
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-11-18       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Antisense Oligonucleotide Therapies for Neurodegenerative Diseases.

Authors:  C Frank Bennett; Adrian R Krainer; Don W Cleveland
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2019-07-08       Impact factor: 12.449

5.  A hexanucleotide repeat expansion in C9ORF72 is the cause of chromosome 9p21-linked ALS-FTD.

Authors:  Alan E Renton; Elisa Majounie; Adrian Waite; Javier Simón-Sánchez; Sara Rollinson; J Raphael Gibbs; Jennifer C Schymick; Hannu Laaksovirta; John C van Swieten; Liisa Myllykangas; Hannu Kalimo; Anders Paetau; Yevgeniya Abramzon; Anne M Remes; Alice Kaganovich; Sonja W Scholz; Jamie Duckworth; Jinhui Ding; Daniel W Harmer; Dena G Hernandez; Janel O Johnson; Kin Mok; Mina Ryten; Danyah Trabzuni; Rita J Guerreiro; Richard W Orrell; James Neal; Alex Murray; Justin Pearson; Iris E Jansen; David Sondervan; Harro Seelaar; Derek Blake; Kate Young; Nicola Halliwell; Janis Bennion Callister; Greg Toulson; Anna Richardson; Alex Gerhard; Julie Snowden; David Mann; David Neary; Michael A Nalls; Terhi Peuralinna; Lilja Jansson; Veli-Matti Isoviita; Anna-Lotta Kaivorinne; Maarit Hölttä-Vuori; Elina Ikonen; Raimo Sulkava; Michael Benatar; Joanne Wuu; Adriano Chiò; Gabriella Restagno; Giuseppe Borghero; Mario Sabatelli; David Heckerman; Ekaterina Rogaeva; Lorne Zinman; Jeffrey D Rothstein; Michael Sendtner; Carsten Drepper; Evan E Eichler; Can Alkan; Ziedulla Abdullaev; Svetlana D Pack; Amalia Dutra; Evgenia Pak; John Hardy; Andrew Singleton; Nigel M Williams; Peter Heutink; Stuart Pickering-Brown; Huw R Morris; Pentti J Tienari; Bryan J Traynor
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 6.  Dysregulated molecular pathways in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis-frontotemporal dementia spectrum disorder.

Authors:  Fen-Biao Gao; Sandra Almeida; Rodrigo Lopez-Gonzalez
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2017-09-15       Impact factor: 14.012

7.  Modeling key pathological features of frontotemporal dementia with C9ORF72 repeat expansion in iPSC-derived human neurons.

Authors:  Sandra Almeida; Eduardo Gascon; Hélène Tran; Hsin Jung Chou; Tania F Gendron; Steven Degroot; Andrew R Tapper; Chantal Sellier; Nicolas Charlet-Berguerand; Anna Karydas; William W Seeley; Adam L Boxer; Leonard Petrucelli; Bruce L Miller; Fen-Biao Gao
Journal:  Acta Neuropathol       Date:  2013-07-09       Impact factor: 17.088

8.  Dipeptide repeat proteins activate a heat shock response found in C9ORF72-ALS/FTLD patients.

Authors:  Daniel A Mordes; Mercedes Prudencio; Lindsey D Goodman; Joseph R Klim; Rob Moccia; Francesco Limone; Olli Pietilainen; Kaitavjeet Chowdhary; Dennis W Dickson; Rosa Rademakers; Nancy M Bonini; Leonard Petrucelli; Kevin Eggan
Journal:  Acta Neuropathol Commun       Date:  2018-07-04       Impact factor: 7.801

9.  Production of poly(GA) in C9ORF72 patient motor neurons derived from induced pluripotent stem cells.

Authors:  Sandra Almeida; Gopinath Krishnan; Mia Rushe; Yuanzheng Gu; Mark W Kankel; Fen-Biao Gao
Journal:  Acta Neuropathol       Date:  2019-10-17       Impact factor: 15.887

10.  Knocking out C9ORF72 Exacerbates Axonal Trafficking Defects Associated with Hexanucleotide Repeat Expansion and Reduces Levels of Heat Shock Proteins.

Authors:  Masin Abo-Rady; Norman Kalmbach; Arun Pal; Carina Schludi; Antje Janosch; Tanja Richter; Petra Freitag; Marc Bickle; Anne-Karin Kahlert; Susanne Petri; Stefan Stefanov; Hannes Glass; Selma Staege; Walter Just; Rajat Bhatnagar; Dieter Edbauer; Andreas Hermann; Florian Wegner; Jared L Sterneckert
Journal:  Stem Cell Reports       Date:  2020-02-20       Impact factor: 7.765

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  RNA-mediated toxicity in C9orf72 ALS and FTD.

Authors:  Zachary T McEachin; Janani Parameswaran; Nisha Raj; Gary J Bassell; Jie Jiang
Journal:  Neurobiol Dis       Date:  2020-08-21       Impact factor: 5.996

Review 2.  CRISPR-Cas9-Mediated Gene Therapy in Neurological Disorders.

Authors:  Lihong Guan; Yawei Han; Ciqing Yang; Suxiang Lu; Jiang Du; Han Li; Juntang Lin
Journal:  Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2021-11-23       Impact factor: 5.590

Review 3.  Therapeutic strategies for C9orf72 amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and frontotemporal dementia.

Authors:  Guillaume M Hautbergue; John D Cleary; Shu Guo; Laura P W Ranum
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurol       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 6.283

4.  Poly(GR) and poly(GA) in cerebrospinal fluid as potential biomarkers for C9ORF72-ALS/FTD.

Authors:  Gopinath Krishnan; Denitza Raitcheva; Daniel Bartlett; Mercedes Prudencio; Diane M McKenna-Yasek; Catherine Douthwright; Björn E Oskarsson; Shafeeq Ladha; Oliver D King; Sami J Barmada; Timothy M Miller; Robert Bowser; Jonathan K Watts; Leonard Petrucelli; Robert H Brown; Mark W Kankel; Fen-Biao Gao
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-05-19       Impact factor: 17.694

Review 5.  Role of the C9ORF72 Gene in the Pathogenesis of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis and Frontotemporal Dementia.

Authors:  Zongbing Hao; Rui Wang; Haigang Ren; Guanghui Wang
Journal:  Neurosci Bull       Date:  2020-08-29       Impact factor: 5.203

Review 6.  Gene therapy for ALS: A review.

Authors:  Defne A Amado; Beverly L Davidson
Journal:  Mol Ther       Date:  2021-04-09       Impact factor: 11.454

7.  Upstream open reading frame with NOTCH2NLC GGC expansion generates polyglycine aggregates and disrupts nucleocytoplasmic transport: implications for polyglycine diseases.

Authors:  Shaoping Zhong; Yangye Lian; Wenyi Luo; Rongkui Luo; Xiaoling Wu; Jun Ji; Yuan Ji; Jing Ding; Xin Wang
Journal:  Acta Neuropathol       Date:  2021-10-25       Impact factor: 17.088

8.  Development of a sensitive trial-ready poly(GP) CSF biomarker assay for C9orf72-associated frontotemporal dementia and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.

Authors:  Katherine M Wilson; Eszter Katona; Idoia Glaria; Mireia Carcolé; Imogen J Swift; Aitana Sogorb-Esteve; Carolin Heller; Arabella Bouzigues; Amanda J Heslegrave; Ashvini Keshavan; Kathryn Knowles; Saurabh Patil; Susovan Mohapatra; Yuanjing Liu; Jaya Goyal; Raquel Sanchez-Valle; Robert Jr Laforce; Matthis Synofzik; James B Rowe; Elizabeth Finger; Rik Vandenberghe; Christopher R Butler; Alexander Gerhard; John C Van Swieten; Harro Seelaar; Barbara Borroni; Daniela Galimberti; Alexandre de Mendonça; Mario Masellis; M Carmela Tartaglia; Markus Otto; Caroline Graff; Simon Ducharme; Jonathan M Schott; Andrea Malaspina; Henrik Zetterberg; Ramakrishna Boyanapalli; Jonathan D Rohrer; Adrian M Isaacs
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2022-04-04       Impact factor: 13.654

9.  A C. elegans model of C9orf72-associated ALS/FTD uncovers a conserved role for eIF2D in RAN translation.

Authors:  Raymond P Roos; Paschalis Kratsios; Yoshifumi Sonobe; Jihad Aburas; Gopinath Krishnan; Andrew C Fleming; Ghanashyam Ghadge; Priota Islam; Eleanor C Warren; Yuanzheng Gu; Mark W Kankel; André E X Brown; Evangelos Kiskinis; Tania F Gendron; Fen-Biao Gao
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-10-15       Impact factor: 17.694

Review 10.  CRISPR and iPSCs: Recent Developments and Future Perspectives in Neurodegenerative Disease Modelling, Research, and Therapeutics.

Authors:  Tirthankar Sen; Rajkumar P Thummer
Journal:  Neurotox Res       Date:  2022-08-31       Impact factor: 3.978

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.