| Literature DB >> 32266230 |
Laichuang Han1, Wenjing Cui1, Qiao Lin1, Qiaoqing Chen1, Feiya Suo1, Ke Ma1, Yang Wang1, Wenliang Hao1, Zhongyi Cheng1, Zhemin Zhou1.
Abstract
A robust and portable expression system is of great importance in enzyme production, metabolic engineering, and synthetic biology, which maximizes the performance of the engineered system. In this study, a tailor-made cobalt-induced expression system (CIES) was developed for low-cost and eco-friendly nitrile hydratase (NHase) production. First, the strong promoter Pveg from Bacillus subtilis, the Ni(II)/Co(II) responsive repressor RcnR, and its operator were reorganized to construct a CIES. In this system, the expression of reporter green fluorescent protein (GFP) was specifically triggered by Co(II) over a broad range of concentration. The performance of the cobalt-induced system was evolved to version 2.0 (CIES 2.0) for adaptation to different concentrations of Co(II) through programming a homeostasis system that rebalances cobalt efflux and influx with RcnA and NiCoT, respectively. Harnessing these synthetic platforms, the induced expression of NHase was coupled with enzyme maturation by Co(II) in a synchronizable manner without requiring additional inducers, which is a unique feature relative to other induced systems for production of NHase. The yield of NHase was 111.2 ± 17.9 U/ml using CIES and 114.9 ± 1.4 U/ml using CIES 2.0, which has a producing capability equivalent to that of commonly used isopropyl thiogalactoside (IPTG)-induced systems. In a scale-up system using a 5-L fermenter, the yielded enzymatic activity reached 542.2 ± 42.8 U/ml, suggesting that the designer platform for NHase is readily applied to the industry. The design of CIES in this study not only provided a low-cost and eco-friendly platform to overproduce NHase but also proposed a promising pipeline for development of synthetic platforms for expression of metalloenzymes.Entities:
Keywords: cobalt-induced; expression system; metal homeostasis; nitrile hydratase; protein expression
Year: 2020 PMID: 32266230 PMCID: PMC7105576 DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2020.00193
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Bioeng Biotechnol ISSN: 2296-4185
FIGURE 1Construction and verification of CIES. (A) Schematic diagram of CIES. (B) GFP expression profile by cells harboring pEVO-GFP and pEVO-GFP-rcnR. Cobalt chloride was added at 2 h after inoculation with 100 μM of the final concentration. (C) SDS-PAGE analysis of GFP expression by cells harboring pEVO-GFP and pEVO-GFP-rcnR. M: marker. 1–4: pEVO-GFP Co(II)-, pEVO-GFP Co(II)+, pEVO-GFP-rcnR Co(II)-, and pEVO-GFP-rcnR Co(II)+. The band of GFP was indicated by an arrow. All error bars in figures presented root-mean-square deviation of three separate experiments.
FIGURE 2Characterization of CIES. (A) The influence of concentration of Co(II) on cell growth. (B) The influence of concentration of Co(II) on GFP expression. (C) The influence of induced occasion on GFP expression. (D) Schematic diagram of various repression strengths by various RcnR expression strengths. (E) The negative correlation between RcnR expression strength and leaky expression. (F) Determination of induction ratio under combinations of different RcnR expression strengths and different concentrations of Co(II). All error bars in figures presented root-mean-square deviation of three separate experiments. FI: Fluorescence intensity.
FIGURE 3Characterization of the performance of CIES under synthetic cobalt homeostasis system. (A) Schematic diagram of synthetic cobalt homeostasis system by introducing the cobalt influx system (NiCoT) and/or efflux system (RcnA). (B,C) The influence of efflux system introduction on the cell growth and GFP expression of CIES at different concentrations of Co(II). (D,E) The influence of influx system introduction on the cell growth and GFP expression of CIES at different concentrations of Co(II). (F,G) The influence of both influx system and efflux system introduction on the cell growth and GFP expression of CIES at different concentrations of Co(II). All error bars in figures presented root-mean-square deviation of three separate experiments.
FIGURE 4NHase production by CIES. (A) Schematic diagram of NHase production by CIES, in which Co(II) functioned as both inducer of expression and metal ligand of activated NHase. (B) The influence of concentration of Co(II) for NHase production on cell growth. (C) Determination of optimized concentration of Co(II) for NHase production. (D) Determination of growth curve and enzyme expression profile of NHase production by CIES over the fermentation process. (E) Determination of growth curve and enzyme expression profile of NHase production by IPTG-induced pET expression system over the fermentation process. -: no Co(II) added; +: added Co(II) with 500 μM of final concentration. The band of fused α/β subunit was indicated by an arrow. All error bars in figures presented root-mean-square deviation of three separate experiments.
FIGURE 5NHase expression by CIES and CIES 2.0. (A) Cell density of NHase expression strains at different concentrations of Co(II). (B) Enzyme activity of NHase expression strains at different concentrations of Co(II). All error bars in figures presented root-mean-square deviation of three separate experiments.
FIGURE 6NHase production in a 5-L fermenter. (A) Cell growth and enzyme activity profiles of NHase-producing strain harboring pEVO-(BA)P-NA(HL) in a 5-L fermenter. The solid arrow indicated the start time of fed batch, and the dotted arrow indicated the time of adding Co(II). (B) SDS-PAGE assay of NHase production. CK means the same strain cultured in a test tube containing 2 × YT medium without addition of Co(II). The band of fused α/β subunit was indicated by the arrow.