| Literature DB >> 32266212 |
Hao Zhang1, Xiaoyang Du1, Yunhan Tang1, Xi Lu1, Lei Zhou1, Caijun Zheng1, Hui Lin1, Silu Tao1.
Abstract
Nowadays, the ternary strategy has become a common way to improve the power conversion eEntities:
Keywords: energy transfer; hydrogen bond; organic solar cells; ternary devices; π-π stacking
Year: 2020 PMID: 32266212 PMCID: PMC7105863 DOI: 10.3389/fchem.2020.00190
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Chem ISSN: 2296-2646 Impact factor: 5.221
Figure 1(A) Chemical structure of PTB7-Th, IEICO-4F and DTBO; (B) FT-IR spectra of DTBO: IEICO-4F blend films with different molar ratios: (i) DTBO: IEICO-4F = 1: 0, (ii) DTBO: IEICO-4F = 1: 0.2, (iii) DTBO: IEICO-4F = 1: 0.5, (iv) DTBO: IEICO-4F = 0: 1; (C) ESP maps of DTBO and Coumarin 7.
Figure 2ESP maps of (A) IEICO-4F and (B) hydrogen-bond-linked IEICO-4F: DTBO; (C) Average ESP statistics of each atom in end group; (D) ESP area distributions of the molecules.
Figure 3(A) UV vis absorption spectra of neat films; (B) HOMO and LUMO energy levels; (C) Absorption spectra of ternary films with different DTBO content; (D) PL spectra of DTBO in chlorobenzene solution and neat DTBO film under 400 nm light excitation; (E) PL spectra of PTB7-Th and DTBO blend films under 450 nm light excitation; (F) J-V curves of PTB7-Th and DTBO based devices.
Figure 4(A) 2-D GIWAXS X-ray scattering pattern; (B) line-cut profiles of binary and ternary films.
Figure 5(A) J–V curve of OSCs devices; (B) EQE curves of the devices with different DTBO content in the PTB7-Th: IEICO-4F systems; (C) ΔEQE for 10% DTBO ternary blends; (D) Inverted OSCs architectures used in this study.
The photovoltaic parameters for binary and ternary OSCs under AM 1.5 G illumination (100 mW/cm2).
| 0% DTBO | 0.68 | 24.94 | 24.06 | 64.97 | 11.02 (11.39) |
| 5% DTBO | 0.69 | 25.66 | 24.48 | 66.08 | 11.65 (12.15) |
| 10% DTBO | 0.70 | 26.43 | 25.66 | 67.64 | 12.48 (12.88) |
| 15% DTBO | 0.69 | 25.78 | 25.29 | 63.90 | 11.30 (11.66) |
| 20% DTBO | 0.70 | 25.86 | 24.51 | 61.60 | 11.10 (11.41) |
| 10% Coumarin 7 | 0.69 | 26.25 | 24.91 | 66.53 | 12.06 (12.33) |
All average values were calculated from 10 devices.
J.
Best PCE in brackets.
Figure 6(A) Charge mobility of the PTB7-Th: IEICO-4F with different content of DTBO. (B) V and (C) J dependence on light illumination intensity curves of OSCs devices. (D) Photocurrent density (J) vs. effective voltage (V0 − V) characteristics.
Figure 7(A) Scheme of energy transfer in DTBO based ternary device; (B) J-V curve of binary and ternary OSCs based PM6: Y6 system; (C) EQE curves of OSCs with 0%, 5% DTBO in the PM6: Y6 systems.
The photovoltaic parameters for PM6: DTBO: Y6 OSCs under AM 1.5 G illumination (100 mW/cm2).
| 0% DTBO | 0.83 | 25.49 | 24.52 | 73.17 | 15.49 (15.85) |
| 5% DTBO | 0.83 | 26.88 | 25.59 | 74.92 | 16.64 (17.07) |
All average values were calculated from 10 devices.
J.
Best PCE in brackets.