| Literature DB >> 32265912 |
Yue Lin1,2, Fan Mao1,3,4, Nai-Kei Wong5, Xiangyu Zhang1,2, Kunna Liu1,2, Minwei Huang1,3,4, Haitao Ma1,3,4, Zhiming Xiang1,3,4, Jun Li1,3,4, Shu Xiao1,3,4, Yang Zhang1,3,4, Ziniu Yu1,3,4.
Abstract
Invertebrates generally lack adaptive immunity and compensate for this with highly efficient innate immune machineries such as phagocytosis by hemocytes to eradicate invading pathogens. However, how extrinsically cued hemocytes marshal internal signals to accomplish phagocytosis is not yet fully understood. To this end, we established a facile magnetic cell sorting method to enrich professional phagocytes from hemocytes of the Hong Kong oyster (Crassostrea hongkongensis), an ecologically and commercially valuable marine invertebrate. Transcriptomic analysis on presorted cells shows that phagocytes maintain a remarkable array of differentially expressed genes that distinguish them from non-phagocytes, including 352 significantly upregulated genes and 479 downregulated genes. Pathway annotations reveal that focal adhesion and extracellular matrix-receptor interactions were the most conspicuously enriched pathways in phagocytes. Phagocytosis rate dramatically declined in the presence of an FAK inhibitor, confirming importance of the focal adhesion pathway in regulating phagocytosis. In addition, we also found that heparan sulfate proteoglycan (HSPG) families were lineage-specifically expanded in C. hongkongensis and abundantly expressed in phagocytes. Efficiency of phagocytosis and hemocytes aggregation was markedly reduced upon blockage of endogenous synthesis of HSPGs, thus implicating these proteins as key surface receptors in pathogen recognition and initiation of phagocytosis.Entities:
Keywords: Crassostrea hongkongensis; focal adhesion kinase (FAK); heparan sulfate proteoglycans (HSPGs); phagocytes; transcriptome
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32265912 PMCID: PMC7103635 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.00416
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Immunol ISSN: 1664-3224 Impact factor: 7.561
Figure 1The process of magnetic beads sorting phagocytes. The hemocytes in Crassostrea hongkongensis are gathered for incubating with magnetic beads and then sorted by magnetic grate. The cells remaining in supernatant are the non-phagocytes. Transcriptome analyzes the samples of phagocytes and non-phagocytes.
Figure 2Transcriptome analysis of differences between Crassostrea hongkongensis phagocytes and non-phagocytes. (A) Transcript expression profiles of hemocytes were analyzed by means of RNA-seq quantification. The heatmap shows the square of correlation among phagocyte, non-phagocyte, and hemocyte group. Each sample contains three independent biological replicates. (B) Principal components analysis plots of gene expression for the three groups of hemocytes using the normalized transcriptome expression. Each group was represented by different-color dots: green for hemocytes, orange for phagocytes, and blue for non-phagocytes. (C) Identification of DEGs between phagocytes and non-phagocytes. The red dots show genes were significantly upregulated in phagocytes, whereas the green dots denote downregulated genes. (D) KEGG enrichment analysis of DEGs between phagocytes and non-phagocytes. The scatterplots illustrate the DEGs enriched in many functional pathways. The enrichment factor of this figure is the ratio of the DEGs number to that of total sample; the dot size denotes the number of DEGs with different colors that are according to the q-value range.
Figure 3The expression and effect of FAK in phagocytes. (A) The heatmap chart used the changes in colors to show differences of the gene expression level between phagocytes and non-phagocytes. (B) The effect of FAK in phagocytosis. Flow cytometry determined the fluorescence intensity that hemocytes contained. Green shows the data of negative control; blue is the normal control; orange, red, and purple show the experimental samples that were treated with different concentrations of inhibitor. While the bar chart compares the fold of phagocytotic ability among the four groups that were under concentration gradient of FAK inhibitor. The bars indicated the fold of phagocytosis. The amount relative to the internal control is expressed as mean ± SD (n = 3). Significant differences relative to control were indicated (*P <0.05 and **P < 0.01).
Figure 4The expression and bioinformatics analysis of HSPGs. (A) The heatmap presents the expression level of ECM–receptor interaction in phagocytes and non-phagocytes. (B) The domain architecture of HSPG, integrin, and collagen. (C) Phylogenetic analysis of mollusk HSPGs, which include Crassostrea gigas, Crassostrea virginica, Crassostrea hongkongensis, Mizuhopecten yessoensis, and Octopus bimaculoides. The neighbor-joining phylogenetic tree was constructed with 1,000 replications of bootstrap.
Figure 5Comparison of the phagocytotic ability among the four groups that had different expressions of HSPG. The expression of HSPG was reduced by the specific inhibitors, chlorate (A) and heparin (B). The changes of fluorescence intensity that hemocytes contained were detected by flow cytometry. And the bar charts compare the phagocytotic ability of different groups in fold. The bars indicate the fold of phagocytosis. The amount relative to the internal control is expressed as mean ± SD (n = 3). Significant differences relative to control were indicated (***P < 0.001). (C) The phagocytotic function of HSPG on the phagocytes. The figures show the phagocytotic changes of hemocytes that were captured by confocal microscopy. The DAPI represents the nuclear; the dye of Dil shows the position of cell membrane; the green fluorescence is on behalf of bacteria. The scale bar of enlarged views is 5 μM; the others are 25 μM.
Figure 6The agglutinative effect of HSPG on the phagocytes. The hemocytes were stained with DAPI and Dil to show the distribution of cells. The control group compares with other experimental groups that were treated with two kinds of specific HSPG inhibitors, chlorate and heparin. The concentrations used for chlorate and heparin were 1 mM and 10 μM. The scale bar of enlarged views is 5 μM; the others are 25 μM. The bar chart indicated the aggregation index. The amount relative to the internal control is expressed as mean ± SD (n = 3). Significant differences relative to control were indicated (**p < 0.001 and ***p < 0.001).
Figure 7The mode pattern of FAK and HSPG in phagocytes. The HSPG works as the receptor that is located at the cell membrane to recognize the microorganism such as bacteria, which is the first step of phagocytosis, while the integrin could stimulate the downstream pathways where FAK is active to associate the other proteins such as filamin A, P130cas. Subsequently, the bacteria would be sent to lysosomal degradation.