| Literature DB >> 32265835 |
Yan-Hong Li1,2, Ke Wen1, Ling-Ling Zhu1, Sheng-Kai Lv1, Qing Cao1, Qian Li1, Libin Deng1, Tingtao Chen1, Xiaolei Wang1, Ke-Yu Deng1, Ling-Fang Wang1, Hong-Bo Xin1.
Abstract
Macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF) has multiple intrinsic enzymatic activities of the dopachrome/phenylpyruvate tautomerase and thiol protein oxidoreductase, and plays an important role in the development of obesity as a pro-inflammatory cytokine. However, which enzymatic activity of MIF is responsible for regulating in obesity are still unknown. In the present study, we investigated the roles of the tautomerase of MIF in high fat diet (HFD)-induced obesity using MIF tautomerase activity-lacking (MIFP1G/P1G) mice. Our results showed that the serum MIF and the expression of MIF in adipose tissue were increased in HFD-treated mice compared with normal diet fed mice. The bodyweights were significantly reduced in MIFP1G/P1G mice compared with WT mice fed with HFD. The sizes of adipocytes were smaller in MIFP1G/P1G mice compared with WT mice fed with HFD using haematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining. In addition, the MIFP1G/P1G mice reduced the macrophage infiltration, seen as the decreases of the expression of inflammatory factors such as F4/80, IL-1β, TNFα, MCP1, and IL-6. The glucose tolerance tests (GTT) and insulin tolerance tests (ITT) assays showed that the glucose tolerance and insulin resistance were markedly improved, and the expressions of IRS and PPARγ were upregulated in adipose tissue from MIFP1G/P1G mice fed with HFD. Furthermore, we observed that the expressions of Bax, a pro-apoptotic protein, and the cleaved caspase 3-positive cells in white tissues were decreased and the ratio of Bcl2/Bax was increased in MIFP1G/P1G mice compared with WT mice. Taken together, our results demonstrated that the tautomerase activity-lacking of MIF significantly alleviated the HFD-induced obesity and adipose tissue inflammation, and improved insulin resistance in MIFP1G/P1G mice.Entities:
Keywords: apoptosis; inflammation; insulin resistance; macrophage migration inhibitory factor; obesity
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32265835 PMCID: PMC7098947 DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2020.00134
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) ISSN: 1664-2392 Impact factor: 5.555
Figure 1Serum MIF and the expression of MIF in adipose tissue were increased in HFD-treated mice. (A) The serum MIF level was determined with MIF ELISA kit in HFD-treated WT mice and ND-treated WT mice. (B) The expression of MIF by real-time PCR analysis in adipose tissue from HFD-treated WT mice and ND-treated WT mice. (C) The images of MIF protein by Western blot analysis in adipose tissue from HFD-treated WT mice and ND-treated WT mice. (D) Quantitative analysis of MIF protein level from western blot bands. Data are shown as mean ± SEM, **p < 0.01 and ***p < 0.001, n = 3–5 per group.
Figure 2MIFP1G/P1G mice protected mice from HFD-induced obesity. (A) The MIFP1G/P1G mouse genotype was identified by RT-PCR. (B) An image of the mice fed with high-fat diet (HFD). Four month-old wild-type (WT) and tautomerase-null macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIFP1G/P1G) mice were fed with HFD for 12 weeks. (C) The bodyweights of the WT and MIFP1G/P1G mice which were fed with ND or HFD were measured every week. (D) The gain curves of bodyweight of mice. The percentage of the bodyweight gain was represented with the initial bodyweight of the mice as a control. (E) The food intake between the two groups under HFD. (F) The water intake between the two groups under HFD. (G) The morphological analysis of Hematoxylin and eosin staining in adipose tissue from the two group mice under ND or HFD. (H) The measurement of adipocyte cross-sectional surface area from the two group mice under ND or HFD. Data are shown as mean ± SEM, *p < 0.05 and **p < 0.01, n = 5–6 per group.
Figure 3MIFP1G/P1G mice reduced adipose tissue inflammation under HFD. (A) The expression of macrophage marker F4/80 in adipose tissue from the two group mice under ND or HFD was examined with immunofluorescence. (B) The quantification of the fluorescence image. (C) The expression of F4/80 by real-time PCR analysis in adipose tissue from the two group mice. (D–G) The expression of pro-inflammatory including IL-1β, TNFα, MCP1, and IL-6 by real-time PCR analysis in adipose tissue from the two group mice. Data are shown as mean ± SEM, *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, and ***p < 0.001, n = 5–6 per group.
Figure 4MIF P1G/P1G mice ameliorated HFD-induced insulin resistance. (A) Glucose tolerance test (GTT) was examined in WT and MIFP1G/P1G mice fed ND or HFD for 10 weeks after 16 h fasted. (B) Insulin tolerance test (ITT) was examined in WT and MIFP1G/P1G mice fed ND or HFD for 11 weeks after 4 h fasted. (C) The images of IRS1 protein by Western blot analysis in adipose tissue from WT and MIFP1G/P1G mice fed ND or HFD. (D–G) The expression of IRS1, IRS-2, GLUT4, and PPARγ by real-time PCR analysis in adipose tissue from the two group mice. Data are shown as mean ± SEM, *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, n = 4–5 per group.
Figure 5MIF P1G/P1G mice ameliorated adipocyte apoptosis under HFD. (A) The images of Bax and Bcl2 protein by Western blot analysis in adipose tissue from WT and MIFP1G/P1G mice fed ND or HFD. (B) The quantitative analysis of the protein level of the Bax and Bcl2 was determined in adipose tissue from WT and MIFP1G/P1G mice fed ND or HFD. (C) The ratio of Bcl2/bax in protein level was quantitatively determined in adipose tissue from the two group mice. (D–E) The expression of Bax and Bcl2 by real-time PCR analysis in adipose tissue from the two group mice. (F) The ratio of Bcl2/Bax was quantitatively determined by qPCR in adipose tissue from the two group mice. Data are shown as mean ± SEM, *p < 0.05, n = 4–5 per group.