| Literature DB >> 32265724 |
Noa Kirschner Peretz1, Sofia Segal1, Yael Yaniv1.
Abstract
Cultured cardiomyocytes have been shown to possess significant potential as a model for characterization of mechano-Ca2+, mechano-electric, and mechano-metabolic feedbacks in the heart. However, the majority of cultured cardiomyocytes exhibit impaired electrical, mechanical, biochemical, and metabolic functions. More specifically, the cells do not beat spontaneously (pacemaker cells) or beat at a rate far lower than their physiological counterparts and self-oscillate (atrial and ventricular cells) in culture. Thus, efforts are being invested in ensuring that cultured cardiomyocytes maintain the shape and function of freshly isolated cells. Elimination of contraction during culture has been shown to preserve the mechano-Ca2+, mechano-electric, and mechano-metabolic feedback loops of cultured cells. This review focuses on pacemaker cells, which reside in the sinoatrial node (SAN) and generate regular heartbeat through the initiation of the heart's electrical, metabolic, and biochemical activities. In parallel, it places emphasis on atrial cells, which are responsible for bridging the electrical conductance from the SAN to the ventricle. The review provides a summary of the main mechanisms responsible for mechano-electrical, Ca2+, and metabolic feedback in pacemaker and atrial cells and of culture methods existing for both cell types. The work concludes with an explanation of how the elimination of mechano-electrical, mechano-Ca2+, and mechano-metabolic feedbacks during culture results in sustained cultured cell function.Entities:
Keywords: 2; 3-butanedione-monoxime; blebbistatin; mechanics; sinoatrial node; ventricular
Year: 2020 PMID: 32265724 PMCID: PMC7100534 DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2020.00163
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Physiol ISSN: 1664-042X Impact factor: 4.566
FIGURE 1Schematic illustration of the major players in mechano-electrical, mechano-Ca2+, and mechano-metabolic feedbacks.
FIGURE 2Pacemaker cell culture. (A) Representative examples of fresh and cultured pacemaker cells. (B) Representative examples of ryanodine receptor and PLB immunolabeling in fresh and cultured pacemaker cells (No first antibody was added to the negative control). (C) Representative examples of the phosphorylation status immunolabeling of the ryanodine receptors and SERCA in fresh and cultured pacemaker cells. (D) Representative examples of action potential in fresh and cultured pacemaker cells and average data for action potential characteristics (APD50, APD90, normalized amplitude, and cycle length). Data are from Segal et al. (2019). Animals were treated in accordance with the Technion Ethics Committee. The experimental protocols were approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of Technion (Ethics number: IL-118-10-13).
FIGURE 3Atrial cell culture. (A) Representative examples of fresh and cultured atrial cells. (B) Ryanodine and SERCA immunolabeling for fresh and cultured atrial cells’ structures. (C) Representative examples of fresh and cultured atrial cell flavoprotein auto-fluorescence in response to increasing electrical stimulation (1–3 Hz). (D) Representative examples of fresh and cultured AP in atrial cells at 1–3 Hz of external electrical stimulation. Data from Kirschner-Peretz et al. (2017). Animals were treated in accordance with the Technion Ethics Committee. The experimental protocols were approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of Technion (Ethics number: IL-118-10-13). (C) is reproduced from Kirschner-Peretz et al. (2017) with permission.