BACKGROUND: Climacturia affects up to 45% of men after radical prostatectomy (RP). Although urethral slings decrease the severity and frequency of stress incontinence after RP, their efficacy as a treatment for climacturia after RP has not been well studied. AIM: The aim of this study was to assess patient-reported changes in climacturia symptoms after implantation of a urethral sling as a treatment for stress incontinence after RP. METHODS: After Institutional Review Board approval, a retrospective chart review identified males aged 18-80 years who received urethral slings for stress incontinence after RP at our institution from 2012 to 2017. These patients were mailed an 11-item questionnaire asking them about climacturia symptoms before and after implantation of a urethral sling. Written informed consent was obtained from patients participating in the mailed questionnaire. OUTCOMES: Respondents were asked to report on climacturia frequency and severity, bother, partner bother, and incontinence before and after implantation of urethral slings. RESULTS: A total of 42 questionnaires were mailed; 17 were available for analysis. The median age (and interquartile range, IQR) of the sample at RP was 64 (59.5, 68.0). Almost all (94.1%) of the men were sexually active at the time of the study and 64.7% reported experiencing urinary leakage during sexual arousal. Most (58.8%) underwent the urethral sling procedure to treat general incontinence; 35.3% underwent the procedure to treat both general incontinence and incontinence during sexual activity and 1 (5.9%) underwent it for other reasons. A median of 28.1 months elapsed between RP and sling procedure (IQR: 18.36, 53.88; minimum: 8.00; maximum: 108.36). Statistically significant shifts toward improvement from presling to postsling were noted for frequency of leakage during sexual arousal or orgasm (P = .041) and for the degree to which leakage of urine during sexual arousal or orgasm was a "bother" (P = .027). While almost all (94%) of the men were incontinent before sling, this percentage dropped to 53% after sling (P = .031). CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Urethral slings should be discussed as a treatment strategy for climacturia during clinical consultations with patients. STRENGTHS & LIMITATIONS: Strengths include consistent surgical technique. Limitations include retrospective design, lack of a nonsling comparison group, subjective nature of outcome measures, possible response bias, and variability in time interval between RP and sling procedure. CONCLUSION: Use of urethral slings after RP is associated with improvements in climacturia symptoms, bother, and incontinence. Nolan J, Kershen R, Staff I, et al. Use of the Urethral Sling to Treat Symptoms of Climacturia in Men After Radical Prostatectomy. J Sex Med 2020;17:1203-1206.
BACKGROUND: Climacturia affects up to 45% of men after radical prostatectomy (RP). Although urethral slings decrease the severity and frequency of stress incontinence after RP, their efficacy as a treatment for climacturia after RP has not been well studied. AIM: The aim of this study was to assess patient-reported changes in climacturia symptoms after implantation of a urethral sling as a treatment for stress incontinence after RP. METHODS: After Institutional Review Board approval, a retrospective chart review identified males aged 18-80 years who received urethral slings for stress incontinence after RP at our institution from 2012 to 2017. These patients were mailed an 11-item questionnaire asking them about climacturia symptoms before and after implantation of a urethral sling. Written informed consent was obtained from patients participating in the mailed questionnaire. OUTCOMES: Respondents were asked to report on climacturia frequency and severity, bother, partner bother, and incontinence before and after implantation of urethral slings. RESULTS: A total of 42 questionnaires were mailed; 17 were available for analysis. The median age (and interquartile range, IQR) of the sample at RP was 64 (59.5, 68.0). Almost all (94.1%) of the men were sexually active at the time of the study and 64.7% reported experiencing urinary leakage during sexual arousal. Most (58.8%) underwent the urethral sling procedure to treat general incontinence; 35.3% underwent the procedure to treat both general incontinence and incontinence during sexual activity and 1 (5.9%) underwent it for other reasons. A median of 28.1 months elapsed between RP and sling procedure (IQR: 18.36, 53.88; minimum: 8.00; maximum: 108.36). Statistically significant shifts toward improvement from presling to postsling were noted for frequency of leakage during sexual arousal or orgasm (P = .041) and for the degree to which leakage of urine during sexual arousal or orgasm was a "bother" (P = .027). While almost all (94%) of the men were incontinent before sling, this percentage dropped to 53% after sling (P = .031). CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Urethral slings should be discussed as a treatment strategy for climacturia during clinical consultations with patients. STRENGTHS & LIMITATIONS: Strengths include consistent surgical technique. Limitations include retrospective design, lack of a nonsling comparison group, subjective nature of outcome measures, possible response bias, and variability in time interval between RP and sling procedure. CONCLUSION: Use of urethral slings after RP is associated with improvements in climacturia symptoms, bother, and incontinence. Nolan J, Kershen R, Staff I, et al. Use of the Urethral Sling to Treat Symptoms of Climacturia in Men After Radical Prostatectomy. J Sex Med 2020;17:1203-1206.