| Literature DB >> 32260123 |
Shengjing Sun1,2, Xiaochen Zheng1,3, Bing Gong4, Jorge García Paredes1, Joaquín Ordieres-Meré1.
Abstract
Recent advances in technology have empowered the widespread application of cyber-physical systems in manufacturing and fostered the Industry 4.0 paradigm. In the factories of the future, it is possible that all items, including operators, will be equipped with integrated communication and data processing capabilities. Operators can become part of the smart manufacturing systems, and this fosters a paradigm shift from independent automated and human activities to Vhuman-cyber-physical systems (HCPSs). In this context, a Healthy Operator 4.0 (HO4.0) concept was proposed, based on a systemic view of the Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT) and wearable technology. For the implementation of this relatively new concept, we constructed a unified architecture to support the integration of different enabling technologies. We designed an implementation model to facilitate the practical application of this concept in industry. The main enabling technologies of the model are introduced afterward. In addition, a prototype system was developed, and relevant experiments were conducted to demonstrate the feasibility of the proposed system architecture and the implementation framework, as well as some of the derived benefits.Entities:
Keywords: healthy operator 4.0; industrial internet of things; industry 4.0; smart workplaces; vhuman–cyber–physical system
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32260123 PMCID: PMC7180548 DOI: 10.3390/s20072011
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.576
Figure 1Healthy Operator 4.0 (HO4.0) architecture.
Figure 2Crane operator working conditions.
Figure 3Wearable devices used in this application.
Figure 4The app developed for data collection.
Figure 5Overview of the applied wearable data flow.
Data streams with semantic annotation.
| Entity | Message |
|---|---|
| crane operator | { “Ontology”:” |
| environmental situation | {“Ontology”: “AIR_POLLUTION_Onto”, “object”: “airPollutants”, “deviceId”: “Airmonitor1”, “PM”: “25 ug |
| stress factor | {“Ontology”: “HUMAN STRESS ONTOLOGY”, “object”: “Measurements”, “deviceId”: “Hband1”, “Timestramp”: “09/08/2019 09:10:00”, “stressPhysiology”: [ {“heartRate”: “80”, “bloodPressureHigh”: “120”, “bloodPressureLow: “70”}]} |
| position | {“Ontology”: “ILONA”, “object”: “Position”, “deviceId”: “Crane1”, “Coordinate”: [{“x”:”40.342712”, “y”:”-3.123472”, “z”: “605.85”}], “Timestamp”: “09/12/2019 10:10:00”} |
Figure 6Operator exposure to the environmental condition on site. The red line refers to the threshold limit value (TLV).
Figure 7Projected patterns from the digital twin.
The derived rules from the application of machine learning techniques looking at high differences in blood pressure and explaining the intense values.
| Rule Antecedent | Confidence | Support | Lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| ’Arm angle:UP FRONT’ AND ’High Blood Pressure:Intense’ AND ’Heart Rate:Moderate’ | 1.0 | 5.9% | 3.86 |
| ’Sound Level:Noisy’ AND steps:Low AND Arm angle:UP FRONT AND ’High Blood Pressure:Intense’ | 1.0 | 6.27% | 3.86 |
| ’steps:Low’ AND ’HCHO:Relative Moderate’ AND ’High Blood Pressure:Intense’ | 0.84 | 10.0% | 3.85 |
Figure 8Informative phone screens.
Figure 9Informative user phone screens where time granularity can be configured.
Figure 10The graphical detailed view of the collected data at an individual level.