Literature DB >> 32259387

International perspectives: Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on cytology.

Esther Diana Rossi1, Liron Pantanowitz2.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32259387      PMCID: PMC7262335          DOI: 10.1002/cncy.22275

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Cytopathol        ISSN: 1934-662X            Impact factor:   5.284


× No keyword cloud information.
Just about every country in the world is being challenged by a potentially fatal infectious disease known as Coronavirus disease (COVID‐19). The etiologic agent is a novel zoonotic coronavirus (severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 [SARS‐CoV‐2]) that first was detected during an outbreak in Wuhan, China, at the end of 2019. Governments around the globe have since responded with lockdowns to facilitate social distancing and declared national emergencies. Given the pathogenicity of this virus, many patients are becoming critically ill and require hospitalization, which is stressing many health care systems. Cytology laboratories also are being impacted by this pandemic in several ways. Specimens, especially respiratory samples, may be submitted for cytologic evaluation. Not only are these contagious samples to be handled with strict biosafety measures (eg, following biosafety guidelines from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention), but their cytologic findings may be unique and something we likely have not encountered before. Brave cytology staff who are being called to the front line to provide rapid on‐site evaluation need to be adequately armed with personal protective equipment (eg, N95 respirator masks). Now is the time to leverage digital imaging technology in order for cytopathologists to perform telecytology remotely, even from home if required. To allow for social distancing, cytotechnologists who are screening cases should be allowed to spread out as much possible. However, there still is much confusion and anxiety among the cytology community, and many questions remain unanswered at this time. Can cytotechnologists screen cases at home? Should air‐dried smears be avoided? Are the alcohol‐based fixatives typically used in cytology appropriate? Are cytospin preparations that can aerosolize material prohibited? Are cell blocks still required? Should all glass slides be wiped down with disinfectants? Should elective fine‐needle aspirations performed by pathologists be cancelled? Must cytotechnologist training move online? We have traveled down this road before with prior outbreaks (eg, influenza A virus subtype H1N1, SARS, Middle East respiratory syndrome [MERS], and the Ebola virus). However, there remains much to be learned with COVID‐19. Therefore, it is critical for us to gain knowledge from cytology colleagues who have had early experience during the current crisis. Accordingly, we are pleased to share with you timely publications regarding COVID‐19 from Italy, Taiwan, and the United States in this issue of Cancer Cytopathology.

Funding Support

No specific funding was disclosed.

Conflict of Interest Disclosures

The authors made no disclosures.
  5 in total

1.  Emerging infections and the cytology laboratory.

Authors:  Liron Pantanowitz
Journal:  Cancer Cytopathol       Date:  2015-03-18       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  Going remote: Maintaining normalcy in our pathology laboratories during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Emilio Madrigal
Journal:  Cancer Cytopathol       Date:  2020-04-07       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 3.  The epidemiology and pathogenesis of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) outbreak.

Authors:  Hussin A Rothan; Siddappa N Byrareddy
Journal:  J Autoimmun       Date:  2020-02-26       Impact factor: 7.094

Review 4.  The COVID-19 pandemic: implications for the cytology laboratory.

Authors:  Stefan E Pambuccian
Journal:  J Am Soc Cytopathol       Date:  2020-03-26

5.  Exuberant Plasmocytosis in Bronchoalveolar Lavage Specimen of the First Patient Requiring Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for SARS-CoV-2 in Europe.

Authors:  Marco Giani; Davide Seminati; Alberto Lucchini; Giuseppe Foti; Fabio Pagni
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2020-03-17       Impact factor: 15.609

  5 in total
  4 in total

1.  Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on functioning of cytopathology laboratory: Experience and perspective from an academic centre in New York.

Authors:  Renu K Virk; Teresa Wood; Patricia G Tiscornia-Wasserman
Journal:  Cytopathology       Date:  2021-01-19       Impact factor: 1.286

2.  Predictive molecular pathology in the time of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) in Europe.

Authors:  Umberto Malapelle; Pasquale Pisapia; Antonino Iaccarino; Massimo Barberis; Claudio Bellevicine; Hans Brunnström; Dario de Biase; Giovanna De Maglio; Kajsa Ericson Lindquist; Matteo Fassan; Gabriella Fontanini; Elisa Gruppioni; Paul Hofman; Sabine Merkelbach-Bruse; Miguel A Molina Vila; Anaïs Pujals; Ida Rapa; Luisella Righi; Rafael Rosell; Oliver Schildgen; Verena Schildgen; Fernando C Schmitt; Giovanni Tallini; Sara Vander Borght; Elena Vigliar; Marco Volante; Svenja Wagener-Ryczek; Birgit Weynand; Giancarlo Troncone
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2020-07-31       Impact factor: 3.411

3.  Innovations: Innovating together while social distancing.

Authors:  Xiaoyin Sara Jiang; Emilio Madrigal
Journal:  Cancer Cytopathol       Date:  2020-10-15       Impact factor: 4.264

4.  Interventional cytopathology in the COVID-19 era.

Authors:  Andrea Ronchi; Francesca Pagliuca; Federica Zito Marino; Marco Montella; Renato Franco; Immacolata Cozzolino
Journal:  Cytopathology       Date:  2020-08-09       Impact factor: 1.286

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.