Steven P Cohen1,2, Zafeer B Baber3, Asokumar Buvanendran4, Brian C McLean5, Yian Chen6, W Michael Hooten7, Scott R Laker8, Ajay D Wasan9, David J Kennedy10, Friedhelm Sandbrink11, Scott A King12, Ian M Fowler13, Milan P Stojanovic14, Salim M Hayek15, Christopher R Phillips16. 1. Anesthesiology, Neurology and Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Pain Medicine, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Maryland. 2. Anesthesiology and Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland. 3. Division of Anesthesiology and Interventional Pain Management, Lahey Hospital & Medical Center, Beth Israel Lahey Health, Burlington, Massachusetts. 4. Anesthesiology and Orthopedic Surgery, Rush University College of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois. 5. US Army Pain Management Consultant, Pain Management, Department of Anesthesiology, Tripler Army Medical Center, Honolulu, Hawaii. 6. Department of Anesthesiology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland. 7. Anesthesiology and Psychiatry, Mayo School of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota. 8. Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Denver, Colorado. 9. Anesthesiology and Psychiatry, Pain Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. 10. Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee. 11. Pain Management Specialty Services Director, Veterans Health Administration, Washington DC VA Medical Center, Washington, DC. 12. US Air Force Pain Management Consultant, Eglin Air Force Base, Florida. 13. US Navy Pain Management Consultant, Director of Surgical Services, Naval Medical Center-San Diego, San Diego, California. 14. Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain Medicine Service, Interventional Pain Medicine, Edith Nourse Rogers Memorial Veterans Hospital, VA Boston Healthcare System, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. 15. Department of Anesthesiology, University Hospitals, Cleveland Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio. 16. Department of Surgery, Anesthesiology Service, Naval Medical Center- San Diego, California, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: It is nearly impossible to overestimate the burden of chronic pain, which is associated with enormous personal and socioeconomic costs. Chronic pain is the leading cause of disability in the world, is associated with multiple psychiatric comorbidities, and has been causally linked to the opioid crisis. Access to pain treatment has been called a fundamental human right by numerous organizations. The current COVID-19 pandemic has strained medical resources, creating a dilemma for physicians charged with the responsibility to limit spread of the contagion and to treat the patients they are entrusted to care for. METHODS: To address these issues, an expert panel was convened that included pain management experts from the military, Veterans Health Administration, and academia. Endorsement from stakeholder societies was sought upon completion of the document within a one-week period. RESULTS: In these guidelines, we provide a framework for pain practitioners and institutions to balance the often-conflicting goals of risk mitigation for health care providers, risk mitigation for patients, conservation of resources, and access to pain management services. Specific issues discussed include general and intervention-specific risk mitigation, patient flow issues and staffing plans, telemedicine options, triaging recommendations, strategies to reduce psychological sequelae in health care providers, and resource utilization. CONCLUSIONS: The COVID-19 public health crisis has strained health care systems, creating a conundrum for patients, pain medicine practitioners, hospital leaders, and regulatory officials. Although this document provides a framework for pain management services, systems-wide and individual decisions must take into account clinical considerations, regional health conditions, government and hospital directives, resource availability, and the welfare of health care providers. The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Academy of Pain Medicine. This work is written by a US Government employee and is in the public domain in the US.
BACKGROUND: It is nearly impossible to overestimate the burden of chronic pain, which is associated with enormous personal and socioeconomic costs. Chronic pain is the leading cause of disability in the world, is associated with multiple psychiatric comorbidities, and has been causally linked to the opioid crisis. Access to pain treatment has been called a fundamental human right by numerous organizations. The current COVID-19 pandemic has strained medical resources, creating a dilemma for physicians charged with the responsibility to limit spread of the contagion and to treat the patients they are entrusted to care for. METHODS: To address these issues, an expert panel was convened that included pain management experts from the military, Veterans Health Administration, and academia. Endorsement from stakeholder societies was sought upon completion of the document within a one-week period. RESULTS: In these guidelines, we provide a framework for pain practitioners and institutions to balance the often-conflicting goals of risk mitigation for health care providers, risk mitigation for patients, conservation of resources, and access to pain management services. Specific issues discussed include general and intervention-specific risk mitigation, patient flow issues and staffing plans, telemedicine options, triaging recommendations, strategies to reduce psychological sequelae in health care providers, and resource utilization. CONCLUSIONS: The COVID-19 public health crisis has strained health care systems, creating a conundrum for patients, pain medicine practitioners, hospital leaders, and regulatory officials. Although this document provides a framework for pain management services, systems-wide and individual decisions must take into account clinical considerations, regional health conditions, government and hospital directives, resource availability, and the welfare of health care providers. The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Academy of Pain Medicine. This work is written by a US Government employee and is in the public domain in the US.
Entities:
Keywords:
COVID-19; Pain Management; Pandemic; Public Health Crisis; SARS-CoV-2
Authors: William E Rosa; Tamryn F Gray; Kimberly Chow; Patricia M Davidson; J Nicholas Dionne-Odom; Viola Karanja; Judy Khanyola; Julius D N Kpoeh; Joseph Lusaka; Samuel T Matula; Polly Mazanec; Patricia J Moreland; Shila Pandey; Amisha Parekh de Campos; Salimah H Meghani Journal: J Hosp Palliat Nurs Date: 2020-08 Impact factor: 1.918
Authors: Mark Servis; Scott M Fishman; Mark S Wallace; Stephen G Henry; Doug Ziedonis; Daniel Ciccarone; Kelly R Knight; Steven Shoptaw; Patrick Dowling; Jeffrey R Suchard; Shalini Shah; Naileshni Singh; Lynette C Cedarquist; Navid Alem; David J Copenhaver; Marjorie Westervelt; Brigham C Willis Journal: Pain Med Date: 2021-02-04 Impact factor: 3.750
Authors: Vera A Baadjou; Marlies Den Hollander; Thijs Van Meulenbroek; Jeanine A Verbunt; Inge Timmers Journal: J Rehabil Med Clin Commun Date: 2020-06-30
Authors: Giuliano Lo Bianco; Alfonso Papa; Michael E Schatman; Andrea Tinnirello; Gaetano Terranova; Matteo Luigi Giuseppe Leoni; Hannah Shapiro; Sebastiano Mercadante Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2021-05-25 Impact factor: 4.241