| Literature DB >> 32259107 |
Zhe Li1,2, Qiang Zheng1, Zhong Lin Wang1,2,3,4, Zhou Li1,2,3.
Abstract
Wearable and implantable electronics (WIEs) are more and more important and attractive to the public, and they have had positive influences on all aspects of our lives. As a bridge between wearable electronics and their surrounding environment and users, sensors are core components of WIEs and determine the implementation of their many functions. Although the existing sensor technology has evolved to a very advanced level with the rapid progress of advanced materials and nanotechnology, most of them still need external power supply, like batteries, which could cause problems that are difficult to track, recycle, and miniaturize, as well as possible environmental pollution and health hazards. In the past decades, based upon piezoelectric, pyroelectric, and triboelectric effect, various kinds of nanogenerators (NGs) were proposed which are capable of responding to a variety of mechanical movements, such as breeze, body drive, muscle stretch, sound/ultrasound, noise, mechanical vibration, and blood flow, and they had been widely used as self-powered sensors and micro-nanoenergy and blue energy harvesters. This review focuses on the applications of self-powered generators as implantable and wearable sensors in health monitoring, biosensor, human-computer interaction, and other fields. The existing problems and future prospects are also discussed.Entities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32259107 PMCID: PMC7085499 DOI: 10.34133/2020/8710686
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Research (Wash D C) ISSN: 2639-5274
Figure 1(a) Structure and working mechanism of the PENG based on ZnO nanowire. (b) Four fundamental working modes of TENGs. (c) Working mechanism of the PYENG.
The characteristics of wearable and implantable PENGs.
| Type feature | Material | Size (cm) | Output voltage ( | Function | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PENG | Inorganic | PZT [ | 1 × 1.5 [ | 0.0235 [ | Power source [ |
| Organic | HS-FPCS [ | 0.5 × 0.5 [ | 130 [ | Power source [ |
Figure 2Piezoelectric materials were studied to fabricate NGs. (a) The e-skin based on ZnO nanowire could be driven by body motion. (b) The flexible pressure sensor is composed of ultrathin adhesive layer, flexible substrate, and PZT thin film. (c) The fabrication process of BaTiO3/PDMS-based PENG. (d) Se-PENG device could be stretched or twisted. NWs: nanowires. (e) The artificial cutaneous sensor is made from PVDF. MB: membrane; PANI: polyaniline; AL/C: aluminum foil coated with conductive carbon. (f) The flexible piezoelectric device is composed of PEDOT:PSS.
Figure 3The triboelectric series of traditional materials. The materials that go in the “positive” direction are more inclined to lose electrons and in the “negative” direction are easier to gain electrons.
The characteristics of wearable and implantable TENGs.
| Type feature | Material | Size (cm) | Output voltage ( | Function | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TENG | Polymer-metal | PTFE-Al [ | 2 × 2 [ | 116 [ | Power source [ |
| Polymer-polymer | PET-PTFE [ | 8 × 3 [ | 300 [ | Power source [ | |
| Polymer-semiconductor | PTFE-PVDF [ | 6 × 3 [ | 1000 [ | Power source [ | |
| Others | PET-conductive fiber [ | 200 × 150 [ | 3 [ | Power source [ |
Figure 4The triboelectric materials and devices. (a) The bendable SUPS is made from Cu-Kapton and could be placed over the radial artery. (b) The patchable integrated devices are made from PDMS-AgNWs/PEDOT:PSS/PU and tied on the neck, forearm, and finger joint. (c) The M-TES consists of FEP nanorod arrays. (d) The pressure sensor has a size of 33 × 33 mm2 and was fabricated by FEP-PDMS. (e) The human respiration-driven system was prepared by PDMS-PANI. (f) The TENG device based on PU-AgNW has a coaxial linear structure and could be stretched to strain of ~50%.
The characteristics and classification of Hybrid NGs.
| Type feature | Material | Size (cm) | Output voltage ( | Function | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hybrid | TENG-PENG | PVDF [ | 1.5 × 1 [ | 12 V [ | Power source [ |
| TENG-PENG-EMG | Nylon-PTFE [ | 5 × 3 [ | 75 V [ | Power source [ | |
| TENG-EMG | Kapton-PTFE [ | 6.7 × 4.5 [ | 4 mA [ | Power source [ | |
| PENG-PYENG-TENG | Ag-coated fabric fiber [ | 12 × 3 [ | — | Sensor [ |
Figure 5Hybrid NGs and their materials. (a) The hybrid generator is made from PENG, EMG, and TENG. (b) The SUM contains PMU, PENG, and TENG which were assembled into a dotted box. (c) The hybrid NG is composed of TENG and PENG.
The summarization for the development of wearable sensors based on NGs.
| Type feature | Tactile sensors | Motion sensors | Strain sensors | Others |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Size (cm) | 1.5 × 1.5 [ | 7.1 ( | 1 × 1 [ | 7.5 × 5 [ |
|
| ||||
| Sensitivity/output voltage | 0.99 V·kPa−1 [ | 0.06 V·N−1 [ | 2.0 V [ | 0.55 V·kPa−1 and 0.1 V·°C−1 [ |
|
| ||||
| Position/accessory | Finger [ | Hand and chest [ | Joint [ | Elbow, leg, neck [ |
|
| ||||
| Flexibility | Yes [ | Yes [ | Yes [ | Yes [ |
|
| ||||
| Stretchability | Yes [ | Yes [ | Yes [ | Yes [ |
|
| ||||
| Types of nanogenerator | PENG [ | TENG [ | PENG [ | TENG [ |
Figure 6The NGs were applied as physical sensors for wearable electronics. (a) The voltage outputs of the 3 × 3 pixel tactile sensor varied with the pressure. (b) An EHTS-TENG-based tactile sensor was provided. (c) Underwater wireless multisite human motion monitoring system based on TENGs. (d) The integrated devices of the strain sensor and the bio-TENG were provided in measuring various human motions. (e) SMF fiber worked as a strain sensor to 20 cycles of loading and unloading from ε = 0% to 10%, 30%, and 50%. (f) The STPC was used to test different bending angles, temperatures, and weight. (g) MFSOTE devices were applied as flexible dual-parameter temperature–pressure sensors.
Figure 7The output voltage of wearable and implantable NGs. Ref: No. 1: Ha et al. [107]; 2: Hou et al. [119]; 3: Kar et al. [128]; 4: Wen et al. [130]; 5: Zou et al. [135]; 6: Lai et al. [137]; 7: Yang et al. [106]; 8: Gogurla et al. [109]; 9: Wen et al. [130]; 10: Zhu et al. [134]; 11: Xu et al. [142]; 12: Lai et al. [131]; 13: Song et al. [139]; 14: Lan et al. [141]; 15: Ha et al. [107]; 16: Yan et al. [138]; 17: Zhang et al. [147]; 18: Karmakara et al. [146]; 19: Zhao et al. [129]; 20: Xue et al. [148]; 21: Li et al. [70]; 22: Ma et al. [105]; 23: Cheng et al. [71]; 24: Liu et al. [151]; 25: Kim et al. [58]; 26: Zheng et al. [104]; 27: Ma et al. [105]; 28: Dagdeviren et al. [45]; 29: Ouyang et al. [152]
The summarization for the development of implantable sensors based on NGs.
| Type feature | Blood pressure sensors | Cardiac and respiratory sensors |
|---|---|---|
| Size (cm) | 1.7( | 2 × 3 [ |
|
| ||
| Sensitivity/output voltage | 1.195 mV·mmHg−1 [ | 4.5 V [ |
|
| ||
| Position/accessory | Heart [ | Heart, lung, diaphragm [ |
|
| ||
| Flexibility | Yes [ | Yes [ |
|
| ||
| Stretchability | None [ | None [ |
|
| ||
| Types of nanogenerator | PENG [ | PENG [ |
Figure 8The implantable devices were applied in BP sensing. (a) The devices were applied for monitoring the velocity of blood flow. (b) The implantable, self-powered, and visualized BP monitoring system was fabricated. (c) SEPS was implanted into the left atrium, and a commercial arterial pressure sensor was placed in the right femoral artery to measure the ECG and the SEPS outputs.
Figure 9The devices were implanted in animals to measure the respiratory and heart beating. (a) A SWG attached to a live rat's diaphragm to sense the signal from the breath and heart beating. (b) iTENGs were implanted between the heart and the pericardium of swine to sense the ECG and breath. (c) The device was implanted in vivo to record ECG signals of the pig. (d) In vivo energy harvester was provided to measure the motion of the heart.