Literature DB >> 3225809

Recording of visual-evoked potentials in dogs with scalp electrodes.

P Bichsel1, J E Oliver, D B Coulter, J Brown.   

Abstract

Following unsuccessful attempts to record visual-evoked potentials (VEPs) in dogs with scalp electrodes, adoption of a new stimulation technique seems to be beneficial. Previously, flashes of white light administered after dark adaptation induced relatively high amplitude electroretinograms (ERGs) covering any VEP activity over the surface of the skull. ERG amplitude, however, can be significantly reduced using flashes of red light after light adaptation (mostly cone stimulation). Simultaneous ERG and VEP recording allows identification of VEPs composed of three significantly different negative peaks (N1, N2, and N3) measured in dogs anesthetized with chloralose and halothane. No more than two of the three peaks were seen in one recording. Only the N1 and N3 waves were consistently recorded in dogs anesthetized with thiopental and thiopental combined with halothane. In 50% of all recordings, N1 was seen alone. The other VEPs consisted of N1 and N2, or N1 and N3 occurring concurrently. The simultaneous occurrence of N2 and N3 waves, however, was never seen. Among all recordings, N1 was most frequently recorded (85% of measurements), followed by N3 and N2 (38% and 31% of measurements, respectively). Peaks of less than 90 ms are highly reproducible. Anesthesia is necessary to eliminate frequent artifacts obtained in conscious and sedated dogs. Thiopental and/or halothane had no effect on measured latencies compared with chloralose.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3225809     DOI: 10.1111/j.1939-1676.1988.tb02811.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vet Intern Med        ISSN: 0891-6640            Impact factor:   3.333


  5 in total

1.  Reactivity of dogs' brain oscillations to visual stimuli measured with non-invasive electroencephalography.

Authors:  Miiamaaria V Kujala; Heini Törnqvist; Sanni Somppi; Laura Hänninen; Christina M Krause; Outi Vainio; Jan Kujala
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-01       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Visual evoked potentials in the horse.

Authors:  L Ström; B Ekesten
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2016-06-21       Impact factor: 2.741

3.  Comparison of the effect of sedation and general anesthesia on pattern and flash visual evoked potentials in normal dogs.

Authors:  Stephanie Chang; Danielle Zwueste; Barbara Ambros; Jonathan Norton; Marina L Leis
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2022-07-13       Impact factor: 2.792

4.  Flash visual evoked potentials in diurnal birds of prey.

Authors:  Maurizio Dondi; Fabio Biaggi; Francesco Di Ianni; Pier Luigi Dodi; Fausto Quintavalla
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2016-07-26       Impact factor: 2.984

5.  Time-resolved classification of dog brain signals reveals early processing of faces, species and emotion.

Authors:  Miiamaaria V Kujala; Jukka-Pekka Kauppi; Heini Törnqvist; Liisa Helle; Outi Vainio; Jan Kujala; Lauri Parkkonen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-11-16       Impact factor: 4.379

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.