| Literature DB >> 32257879 |
Mamta Devi1, Shikha Devi1, Vaishali Sharma1, Nidhi Rana1, Ravi Kant Bhatia1, Arvind Kumar Bhatt1.
Abstract
Plant-based synthesis of nanoparticles has generated worldwide interest because of cost-effectiveness, eco-friendly nature and plethora of applications. In the present investigation, antimicrobial potential of silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) of methanolic extract of Aegle marmelos fruit has been investigated. Agar well diffusion method was used for determining antimicrobial activity of solvent extracts (viz., petroleum ether, chloroform, acetone, methanol and aqueous), and AgNPs. Among these, methanolic extract of A. marmelos showed highest inhibitory activity against B. cereus (16.17 ± 0.50 mm) followed by P. aeruginosa (13.33 ± 0.62 mm) and E. coli. Phytochemical analysis of methanolic extract of A. marmelos revealed the presence of tannins, saponins, steroids, alkaloids, flavonoids, and glycosides. AgNPs synthesized using A. marmelos methanolic extract, characterized by UV-Visible spectroscopy, atomic force microscopy, dynamic light scattering, and X-ray diffraction showed a peak at 436 nm and size ranged between 159 and 181 nm. Evaluation of the antimicrobial potential of green synthesized AgNPs recorded the highest inhibitory activity against B. cereus (19.25 ± 0.19 mm) followed by P. aeruginosa (16.50 ± 0.30 mm) and S. dysentriae. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of synthesized AgNPs was found to be in the range of 0.009875-0.0395 mg/100 μl which was quite lower than the MIC of crude extract i.e. 0.0781-0.3125 mg/100 μl. The results obtained indicated that the different crude extracts of A. marmelos plant as well as AgNPs have a strong and effective antimicrobial potential that provide a marvelous source for the development of new drug molecules of herbal origin which may be used for the welfare of humanity.Entities:
Keywords: AFM; Antimicrobial potential; Crude extract; MIC; Nanoparticle; XRD
Year: 2019 PMID: 32257879 PMCID: PMC7109472 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcme.2019.04.007
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Tradit Complement Med ISSN: 2225-4110
Fig. 1Effect of different extracts of A. marmelos leaf against various pathogens (A) Petroleum ether extract on B. cereus, (B) Acetone extract on E. coli and (C) Methanol extract on E. coli.
Antimicrobial activity of methanolic extract of Aegle marmelos leaf and fruit on various pathogenic strains.
| Plant extracts | Microorganisms | Stock solution of plant extract (100 mg/ml) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10 μl | 20 μl | 30 μl | 40 μl | Positive control | |||
| Methanol | Leaf | 0 | 0 | 7.35 ± 0.23 | 9.0 ± 0.15 | 16.0 ± 0.15 | |
| Fruit | 7.25 ± 0.19 | 9.11 ± 0.53 | 11.13 ± 0.13 | 13.22 ± 0.18 | 15.0 ± 0.55 | ||
| Leaf | 0 | 5.25 ± 0.65 | 7.33 ± 0.60 | 9.16 ± 0.54 | 17.5 ± 0.74 | ||
| Fruit | 6.22 ± 0.52 | 7.11 ± 0.55 | 9.17 ± 0.50 | 13.0 ± 0.85 | 17.0 ± 0.49 | ||
| Leaf | 0 | 0 | 9.23 ± 0.09 | 10.33 ± 0.60 | 20.0 ± 0.15 | ||
| Fruit | 7.11 ± 0.15 | 8.0 ± 0.15 | 10.0 ± 0.44 | 12.23 ± 0.50 | 20.5 ± 0.30 | ||
| Leaf | 0 | 6.12 ± 0.48 | 8.0 ± 0.53 | 10.0 ± 0.15 | 25.5 ± 0.67 | ||
| Fruit | 8.22 ± 0.16 | 9 ± 0.53 | 11.33 ± 0.87 | 13.15 ± 0.53 | 19.0 ± 0.59 | ||
| Leaf | 0 | 7.16 ± 0.62 | 9.0 ± 0.59 | 10.23 ± 0.18 | 19.5 ± 0.31 | ||
| Fruit | 6.0 ± 0.15 | 8.22 ± 0.56 | 10.36 ± 0.58 | 12.15 ± 0.54 | 19.0 ± 0.15 | ||
| Leaf | 0 | 0 | 5.33 ± 0.22 | 8.32 ± 0.22 | 18.5 ± 0.51 | ||
| Fruit | 8.28 ± 0.55 | 10.0 ± 0.15 | 12.0 ± 0.44 | 13.33 ± 0.62 | 18.5 ± 0.91 | ||
| Leaf | 6.0 ± 0.15 | 7.11 ± 0.85 | 8.23 ± 0.18 | 10.15 ± 0.62 | 15.0 ± 0.49 | ||
| Fruit | 7.22 ± 0.50 | 19.12 ± 0.16 | 14.25 ± 0.53 | 16.17 ± 0.50 | 15.0 ± 0.15 | ||
Fig. 2Effect of different extracts of A. marmelos fruit and AgNPs against various pathogens (A) petroleum ether extract on E. coli (B) chloroform extract on B. cereus (C) Acetone extract on E. coli (D) methanolic extract on S. typhi (E) AgNPs on S. typhi (F) AgNPs on B. cereus.
Comparison of antimicrobial activity and MIC of synthesized AgNPs with crude methanolic extracts of A. marmelos fruit and leaf.
| Bacterial isolates | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zone of inhibition (mm) | MIC (mg/100 μl) | |||||
| AgNPs | Fruit methanolic extract | Leaf methanolic extract | AgNPs | Fruit methanolic extract | Leaf methanolic extract | |
| 15.15 ± 0.62 | 13.22 ± 0.18 | 9.0 ± 0.15 | 0.009875 | 0.1562 | 0.625 | |
| 15.22 ± 0.52 | 13.00 ± 0.85 | 9.16 ± 0.54 | 0.01975 | 0.1562 | 0.625 | |
| 14.50 ± 0.70 | 12.23 ± 0.50 | 10.33 ± 0.60 | 0.01975 | 0.0781 | 1.25 | |
| 16.50 ± 0.30 | 13.33 ± 0.62 | 10.0 ± 0.15 | 0.01975 | 0.1562 | 2.5 | |
| 15.90 ± 0.85 | 13.15 ± 0.53 | 10.23 ± 0.18 | 0.0781 | 0.3125 | 0.625 | |
| 14.65 ± 0.38 | 12.15 ± 0.54 | 8.32 ± 0.22 | 0.0395 | 0.0781 | 1.25 | |
| 19.25 ± 0.19 | 16.17 ± 0.50 | 10.15 ± 0.62 | 0.0395 | 0.0781 | 0.625 | |
Fig. 3MIC of methanolic extract of A. marmelos (A) leaf (B) fruit and (C) AgNPs.
Fig. 4Green synthesis of silver nanoparticles: AgNO3 Solution, AgNO3+Plant extract, AgNO3+Plant extract after 24 h, synthesized silver nanoparticles. A Characterization of AgNPs (B) UV-VIS Spectroscopy (C) X-Ray Diffraction (D) Atomic Force Microscopy (E) Dynamic Light Scattering.