Literature DB >> 32257744

Peanut early flowering stage is beneficial to Metarhizium anisopliae survival and control of white grub larvae.

Xingjia Li1, Xiangqun Nong1, Xun Liu1, Guangjun Wang1, Mark Richard McNeill2, Hidayat Ullah1,3, Qinglei Wang4, Harold V Henderson5, Zehua Zhang1.   

Abstract

The study aims to determine the timing of application for high efficacy of Metarhizium anisopliae as a biocontrol agent. A field experiment was undertaken with M. anisopliae applied to the soil at five intervals during the peanut crop lifecycle, at seed germination (day 0) through to pod filling period [75 days after sowing (DAS)], and assessed the change of M. anisopliae density by sampling rhizospheric soil, subsequently at regular intervals and testing counts (CFU/g dry soil) through to harvest. The crop was sown into soil with an established white grub population, with larval density determined at harvest when the trial was concluded. Applications at 0, 15 and 30 days in the crop growth cycle, saw M. anisopliae mean propagule counts drop significantly after 15 days before increasing over the following 15-45 days. We observed an elevated mean increase in counts 30-45 days after application at the early flowering stage (30 DAS). Irrespective of application timing, in general, M. anisopliae densities declined to less than the initial 10% in the late stages of peanut development. At harvest, larval densities in all M. anisopliae treatments were significantly less compared to the control, with the highest mortality (72%) in M. anisopliae treatment applied at early flowering (30 DAS). Relationship analysis showed that white grub density was significantly related to peanut yield. A regression of yield on number of damaged pods also supported that treatment at the early flowering caused the highest impact in terms of reducing damage to pods and improving yield. These results suggest that applying M. anisopliae at the early flowering stage optimizes survival of M. anisopliae in the soil profile, meaning greater probability of larvae contacting the pathogen, leading to greater mortality. © King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology 2020.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Entomopathogens; Holotrichia sp.; Insect-pathogen interactions; Integrated pest management (IPM); Peanut phenophases; Rhizosphere

Year:  2020        PMID: 32257744      PMCID: PMC7113344          DOI: 10.1007/s13205-020-02178-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  3 Biotech        ISSN: 2190-5738            Impact factor:   2.406


  14 in total

1.  Persistence of Metarhizium (Hypocreales: Clavicipitaceae) and Beauveria bassiana (Hypocreales: Clavicipitaceae) in Tobacco Soils and Potential as Biocontrol Agents of Spodoptera litura (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae).

Authors:  Hua Yang; Chang-Sheng Qin; Yong-Ming Chen; Gong-Ying Zhang; Li-Hong Dong; Shu-Qing Wan
Journal:  Environ Entomol       Date:  2019-02-13       Impact factor: 2.377

2.  A method of computing the effectiveness of an insecticide. 1925.

Authors:  W S Abbott
Journal:  J Am Mosq Control Assoc       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 0.917

Review 3.  The environmental risks of neonicotinoid pesticides: a review of the evidence post 2013.

Authors:  Thomas James Wood; Dave Goulson
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-06-07       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Habitat association in two genetic groups of the insect-pathogenic fungus metarhizium anisopliae: uncovering cryptic species?

Authors:  M J Bidochka; A M Kamp; T M Lavender; J Dekoning; J N De Croos
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Field studies using a recombinant mycoinsecticide (Metarhizium anisopliae) reveal that it is rhizosphere competent.

Authors:  Gang Hu; Raymond J St Leger
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  The MAD1 adhesin of Metarhizium anisopliae links adhesion with blastospore production and virulence to insects, and the MAD2 adhesin enables attachment to plants.

Authors:  Chengshu Wang; Raymond J St Leger
Journal:  Eukaryot Cell       Date:  2007-03-02

7.  Factors affecting the occurrence and distribution of entomopathogenic fungi in natural and cultivated soils.

Authors:  Enrique Quesada-Moraga; Juan A Navas-Cortés; Elizabeth A A Maranhao; Almudena Ortiz-Urquiza; Cándido Santiago-Alvarez
Journal:  Mycol Res       Date:  2007-07-03

8.  A multilocus phylogeny of the Metarhizium anisopliae lineage.

Authors:  Joseph F Bischoff; Stephen A Rehner; Richard A Humber
Journal:  Mycologia       Date:  2009 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.696

9.  Declines in insectivorous birds are associated with high neonicotinoid concentrations.

Authors:  Caspar A Hallmann; Ruud P B Foppen; Chris A M van Turnhout; Hans de Kroon; Eelke Jongejans
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-07-09       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Studies on adaptations of Metarhizium anisopliae to life in the soil.

Authors:  Raymond J St Leger
Journal:  J Invertebr Pathol       Date:  2008-03-07       Impact factor: 2.841

View more
  1 in total

1.  Evidence of the Involvement of a Plus-C Odorant-Binding Protein HparOBP14 in Host Plant Selection and Oviposition of the Scarab Beetle Holotrichia parallela.

Authors:  Yafei Qu; Xiangyu Liu; Xu Zhao; Jianhui Qin; Yazhong Cao; Kebin Li; Jing-Jiang Zhou; Senshan Wang; Jiao Yin
Journal:  Insects       Date:  2021-05-10       Impact factor: 2.769

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.