| Literature DB >> 32257637 |
Qian Wang1,2,3, Yangdong Zhang1,2,3, Nan Zheng1,2,3, Shengguo Zhao1,2,3, Songli Li1,2,3, Jiaqi Wang1,2,3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Previous studies on the effects of mycotoxins have solely focused on their biochemical profiles or products in dairy ruminants. Changes in metabolism that occur after exposure to mycotoxins, as well as biochemical changes, have not been explored.Entities:
Keywords: Biochemical; Cottonseed; Dairy cow; Metabolomic; Mycotoxin
Year: 2020 PMID: 32257637 PMCID: PMC7103205 DOI: 10.7717/peerj.8742
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PeerJ ISSN: 2167-8359 Impact factor: 2.984
Ingredients and mycotoxins composition of diets.
| % DM | |
|---|---|
| Oats hay | 2.24 |
| Corn silage | 45.57 |
| Alfalfa hay | 8.07 |
| Soybean meal | 4.86 |
| DDGS | 5.58 |
| Corn meal | 11.88 |
| Wheat bran | 2.24 |
| Extruded soy flour | 0.56 |
| Corn bran shotcrete | 4.59 |
| Cottonseed | 4.48 |
| Mineral meal | 0.22 |
| Diamond XP | 0.13 |
| NaHCO3 | 0.54 |
| NaCl | 0.07 |
| Premix | 1.12 |
| Water | 7.84 |
| Crude Protein | 17.65 |
| Fat | 4.15 |
| Non fiber carbohydrate | 39.5 |
| Neutral detergent fiber | 29.49 |
| Ca | 0.8 |
| P | 0.48 |
| Ash | 9.27 |
| Metabolic energy | 2.88 |
| Net Energy | 1.67 |
| AFB1 | 20.08 |
| ZEA | 85.13 |
| DON | ND |
Notes.
Control group (0% of uncontaminated cottonseed replaced in diet); 50% replacement group (50% of the uncontaminated cottonseed replaced with cottonseed contaminated with mycotoxins).
Dried distillers grains with solubles.
ppb, µg/kg; AFB1, aflatoxin B1; ZEA, zearalenone; DON, deoxynivalenol.
ND, not detected.
Effects of cottonseed contaminated with mycotoxins on the serum biochemical, antioxidant, and immune indices of dairy cows.
| ALT (U/L) | 29.75 | 29.75 | 29.86 | 1.05 | 0.99 |
| AST (U/L) | 72.75 | 71.00 | 77.50 | 3.03 | 0.68 |
| AST/ ALT | 2.52 | 2.41 | 2.62 | 0.11 | 0.78 |
| GGT (U/L) | 43.09 | 29.30 | 34.45 | 2.16 | 0.02 |
| ALP (U/L) | 90.31 | 67.61 | 71.19 | 12.36 | 0.74 |
| TP (g/L) | 73.96 | 73.53 | 73.53 | 0.97 | 0.98 |
| ALB(g/L) | 36.44 | 35.49 | 36.14 | 0.45 | 0.69 |
| GLOB(g/L) | 37.53 | 38.04 | 37.39 | 1.08 | 0.97 |
| A/G | 0.98 | 0.94 | 1.01 | 0.03 | 0.72 |
| UREA(mmol/ml) | 3.10 | 3.45 | 3.30 | 0.11 | 0.44 |
| CR (µmol/L) | 71.16 | 67.50 | 70.36 | 2.13 | 0.78 |
| UA(µmol/L) | 25.85 | 28.56 | 30.49 | 1.94 | 0.64 |
| TBil(µmol/L) | 11.05 | 9.82 | 9.82 | 0.53 | 0.46 |
| DBil(µmol/L) | 2.28 | 2.03 | 2.40 | 0.09 | 0.21 |
| IBiL(µmol/L) | 8.78 | 7.79 | 9.00 | 0.45 | 0.53 |
| TG(mmol/ml) | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.06 | 0.004 | 0.74 |
| TC(mmol/ml) | 6.03 | 5.95 | 6.71 | 0.26 | 0.46 |
| GSH-PX (U/ml) | 669.0 | 661.5 | 687.8 | 12.48 | 0.70 |
| MDA(nmol/ml) | 12.42 | 12.77 | 8.02 | 1.18 | 0.19 |
| SOD(U/ml) | 106.9 | 108.9 | 107.4 | 0.81 | 0.57 |
| SOD/ MDA | 10.32 | 11.8 | 15.63 | 1.31 | 0.24 |
| T-AOC(U/ml) | 2.40 | 2.39 | 3.52 | 0.26 | 0.009 |
| IgG (µg/ml) | 13.67 | 18.75 | 13.75 | 2.13 | 0.56 |
| IgA (ng/ml) | 59.43 | 50.82 | 53.57 | 4.46 | 0.43 |
| IgM (ng/ml) | 22.40 | 23.42 | 22.30 | 1.95 | 0.93 |
Notes.
Control group (uncontaminated cottonseed), 50% replacement group (50% of the uncontaminated cottonseed replaced with cottonseed contaminated with mycotoxins), and 100% replacement group (100% of the uncontaminated cottonseed replaced with cottonseed contaminated with mycotoxins).
ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; GGT, -glutamyl transpeptidase; ALP, alkaline phosphatase; TP, total protein; ALB, albumin; GLOB, globulin; A/G, albumin/ globulin; UREA, urea; CR, creatinine; UA, uric acid; TBil, total bilirubin; DBil, directed bilirubin; IBiL, indirect bilirubin; TG, total triglyceride; TC, total cholesterol; GSH-PX, glutathione peroxidase; MDA, malondialdehyde; T-AOC, total antioxidant capacity; SOD, superoxide Dismutase; IgG, immunoglobulin G; IgA, immunoglobulin A; IgM, immunoglobulin M.
Probability associated with the F-test based on differences between treatments.
Means in the same row with different superscripts are significantly different (P < 0.05) according to Tukeys test.
Figure 1Effects of cottonseed contaminated with mycotoxins on the concentration of NH3-N (A) and total VFA (Volatile Fatty Acid) (B) in the cows rumen.
Notes: Control group = uncontaminated cottonseed; 50% replacement group = 50% of the uncontaminated cottonseed was replaced with cottonseed contaminated with mycotoxins; and 100% replacement group = 100% of the uncontaminated cottonseed was replaced with cottonseed contaminated with mycotoxins.
Effects of cottonseed contaminated with mycotoxins on volatile fatty acid concentrations in the cow rumen.
| Acetate | 65.55 | 62.72 | 60.78 | 1.08 | 0.19 |
| Propoinate | 22.49 | 22.76 | 22.03 | 0.41 | 0.78 |
| Acetate/Propoinate | 2.93 | 2.77 | 2.77 | 0.06 | 0.43 |
| Isobutyrate | 0.66 | 0.72 | 0.75 | 0.02 | 0.27 |
| Butyrate | 12.73 | 12.31 | 12.21 | 0.36 | 0.84 |
| Isovalerate | 1.27 | 1.61 | 1.29 | 0.05 | 0.008 |
| Valerate | 1.39 | 1.51 | 1.31 | 0.06 | 0.21 |
Notes.
Control group (uncontaminated cottonseed), 50% replacement group (50% of the uncontaminated cottonseed replaced with cottonseed contaminated with mycotoxins), and 100% replacement group (100% of the uncontaminated cottonseed replaced with cottonseed contaminated with mycotoxins).
Probability associated with the F-test based on differences between treatments.
Means in the same row with different superscripts are significantly different (P < 0.05) according to Tukeys test.
Figure 2Representative 600 MHz 1D NOESY 1H-NMR spectra (δ0.5–5.5 and δ5.5–9.0) from cows plasma.
(A) Control group, (B) 50% replacement group (50% of the uncontaminated cottonseed was replaced with cottonseed contaminated with mycotoxins), and (C) 100% replacement group (100% of the uncontaminated cottonseed was replaced with cottonseed contaminated with mycotoxins). The δ5.5–9.0 region was magnified 16 times relative to the corresponding δ0.5–5.5 region for clarity. Abbreviations: Glu: Glutamate; NAG, N-acetyl glycoprotein signals; L1, LDL (Low Density Lipoprotein), CH3–(CH2)n-; L2, VLDL (Very Low Density Lipoprotein), CH3–(CH2)n-; L3, LDL, CH3–(CH2)n-; L4, VLDL, CH3–(CH2)n-; L5, VLDL, −CH2; L6, lipid, −CH2–CH =CH-; L7, lipid, −CH2–C =O; L8, lipid, =CH-CH2–CH=.
Figure 3PCA plot based on the 1H NMR spectra for plasma obtained from different groups.
(A) Score plot for the PCA model of the control, 50% replacement group, and 100% replacement group; (B) score plot for the PCA model of the control and 50% replacement group; (C) score plot for the PCA model of the control and 100% replacement group; (D) score plot for the PCA model of the 50% replacement group and 100% replacement group. Control (I), black square; 50% replacement group (50% of the uncontaminated cottonseed was replaced with cottonseed contaminated with mycotoxins) (II), red spot; 100% replacement group (100% of the uncontaminated cottonseed was replaced with cottonseed contaminated with mycotoxins) (III), blue diamond.
Figure 4OPLS-DA score plots (A, D, and G) derived from 1H NMR spectra for plasma and the corresponding coefficient loading plots (B, C, E, F, H, and I, in which, B, E and H are images magnified 20 times).
Control (I), black square; 50 % replacement group (50% of the uncontaminated cottonseed was replaced with cottonseed contaminated with mycotoxins), (II), red spot; 100% replacement group (100% of the uncontaminated cottonseed was replaced with cottonseed contaminated with mycotoxins), (III), blue diamond. The color map shows the significant variations in metabolites between the two classes. Peaks in the positive direction indicate that metabolites were more abundant in the groups in the positive direction of the first principal component. Thus, metabolites that were more abundant in the three groups in the negative direction of the first primary component were shown as peaks in the negative direction.
OPLS-DA coefficients derived from the NMR data of plasma metabolites obtained from (A) control, (B) 50% replacement group (50% of the uncontaminated cottonseed replaced with cottonseed contaminated with mycotoxins) and (C) 100% replacement group (100% of the uncontaminated cottonseed replaced with cottonseed contaminated with mycotoxins).
| Metabolites | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| A | A | B | |
| Ala(Alanine): 1.48(d) | – | −0.669 | 0.763 |
| Lys(Lysine): 1.49(m), 1.74(m), 1.91(m) | 0.743 | – | 0.697 |
| Gln(Glutamine): 2.12(m), 2.42(m) | – | – | 0.733 |
| OAG(O-acetyl-glycoprotein): 2.13(s) | – | – | 0.668 |
| Cit(Citrate): 2.54(d), 2.68(d) | – | −0.748 | 0.695 |
| Cr(Creatine): 3.03(s),3.93(s) | – | – | 0.674 |
| Gly(Glycine): 3.56(s) | – | – | 0.731 |
| Glucose: 3.42(t), 3.54(dd), 3.71(t), 3.73(m), 3.84(m), 3.25(dd), 3.41(t), 3.46(m), 3.49(t), 3.90(dd), 4.65(d), 5.23(d) | – | – | 0.768 |
Notes.
Correlation coefficients where positive and negative signs indicate positive and negative correlations between the concentrations, respectively. Correlation coefficients of |r| > 0.666, 0.707, or 0.755 were used as the cutoff values for significant differences based on the discrimination significance at the P = 0.05 level, where df (degrees of freedom) = 7, 6, or 5; “-” indicates that the correlation coefficient |r| was less than 0.666, 0.707, or 0.755.
Multiplicity: s, singlet; d, doublet; t, triplet; q, quartet; dd, doublet of doublets; m, multiplet; br, broad resonance.
Figure 5Metabolome view map showing the matched pathways according to the Pvalues obtained from pathway enrichment analysis and the pathway impact values produced by pathway topology analysis.
Aminoacyl-tRNA biosynthesis (a); nitrogen metabolism (b); alanine, aspartate, and glutamate metabolism (c). The x-axis represents the pathway impact and the y-axis represents pathway enrichment. In the map, dots with larger sizes and darker colors represent higher pathway enrichment and higher pathway impact values, respectively.