Literature DB >> 32257610

Distal Metaphyseal Osteotomy Allows for Greater Ulnar Shortening Compared to Diaphyseal Osteotomy for Ulnar Impaction Syndrome: A Biomechanical Study.

T David Luo1, Michael De Gregorio1, Andrey Zuskov1, Mario Khalil1, Zhongyu Li1, Fiesky A Nuñez1,2, Fiesky A Nuñez1,2.   

Abstract

Purpose  To compare the biomechanical characteristics between diaphyseal and metaphyseal ulnar-shortening osteotomy with respect to (1) maximal shortening achieved at each osteotomy site and (2) force required to achieve shortening at each site. Methods  Nine fresh frozen cadaveric upper extremities were affixed through the proximal ulna to a wooden surgical board. A metaphyseal 20-mm bone wedge was resected from the distal ulna and sequential shortening was performed. A load cell was attached to a distal post that was clamped to the surgical board and used to measure the force required for each sequential 5-mm of shortening until maximal shortening was achieved. The resected bone was reinserted, and plate fixation was used to restore normal anatomy. A 20-mm diaphyseal osteotomy was performed, and force measurements were recorded in the same manner with (1) interosseous membrane intact, (2) central band released, and (3) extensive interosseous membrane and muscular attachments released. Results  Metaphyseal osteotomy allowed greater maximal shortening than diaphyseal osteotomy with the interosseous membrane intact and with central band release but similar shortening when extensive interosseous membrane and muscle release was performed. Force at maximal shortening was similar between metaphyseal and diaphyseal osteotomy. Sequential soft tissue release at the diaphysis allowed for increased shortening with slightly decreased shortening force with sequential release. Conclusion  Metaphyseal ulnar osteotomy allows greater maximal shortening but requires similar force compared with diaphyseal osteotomy. Sequential release of the interosseous membrane permits increased shortening at the diaphysis but requires extensive soft tissue release. Clinical Relevance  Both sites of osteotomy can achieve sufficient shortening to decompress the ulnocarpal joint for most cases of ulnar impaction syndrome. The greater shortening from metaphyseal ulnar osteotomy may be reserved for severe cases of shortening, especially after distal radius malunion or in the setting of distal radius growth arrest in the pediatric population. Level of Evidence  This is a Level V, basic science study. © Thieme Medical Publishers.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cadaver; diaphyseal osteotomy; metaphyseal osteotomy; ulnar impaction syndrome; ulnar-shortening osteotomy

Year:  2019        PMID: 32257610      PMCID: PMC7113004          DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1695707

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Wrist Surg        ISSN: 2163-3916


  44 in total

1.  Smoking and bony union after ulna-shortening osteotomy.

Authors:  F Chen; A L Osterman; K Mahony
Journal:  Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ)       Date:  2001-06

2.  Distal metaphyseal ulnar-shortening osteotomy: surgical technique.

Authors:  Warren C Hammert; Richard B Williams; Jeffrey A Greenberg
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 2.230

3.  Force transmission through the distal ulna: effect of ulnar variance, lunate fossa angulation, and radial and palmar tilt of the distal radius.

Authors:  F W Werner; A K Palmer; M D Fortino; W H Short
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 2.230

4.  Osteochondral shortening osteotomy for the treatment of ulnar impaction syndrome: a new technique.

Authors:  Joseph F Slade; Thomas J Gillon
Journal:  Tech Hand Up Extrem Surg       Date:  2007-03

5.  Ulnar shortening osteotomy with a premounted sliding-hole plate.

Authors:  Hugo B Kitzinger; Birgit Karle; Steffen Löw; Hermann Krimmer
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 1.539

6.  Ulnar or radial shortening osteotomy with a single saw cut.

Authors:  Shafic A Sraj; Jeffrey E Budoff
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  2009-06-04       Impact factor: 2.230

7.  Experimental healing of distraction osteogenesis comparing metaphyseal with diaphyseal sites.

Authors:  J Aronson; X Shen
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Mid-term results following ulna shortening osteotomy.

Authors:  Duretti T Fufa; Michele G Carlson; Ryan P Calfee; Nandita Sriram; Richard H Gelberman; Andrew J Weiland
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2013-11-14

9.  Radiographic appearance and patient outcome after ulnar shortening osteotomy for idiopathic ulnar impaction syndrome.

Authors:  Jung Il Lee; Dong Hun Suh; Joon Sung Byun; Ji Hoon Bae; Jae Young Hong; Jung Ho Park; Jong Woong Park
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 2.230

10.  Positive or negative ulnar variance after ulnar shortening for ulnar impaction syndrome: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Soo-Min Cha; Hyun-Dae Shin; Kyung-Cheon Kim
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2012-08-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.