| Literature DB >> 32256769 |
Qing-Bo Wei1,2, Ning Ding1,2, Jiao-Jiao Wang1,2, Wei Wang3, Wei-Ping Gao1,2.
Abstract
The effectiveness of acupuncture in the treatment of dry eye has been confirmed, but the association between acupoint selection and therapeutic effect has remained to be elucidated. In the present study, a systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to evaluate the effect of periocular acupoints and periocular acupoints plus body acupoints compared with AT for the treatment of dry eye disease (DED). The PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, Ovid, China National Knowledge Infrastructure and Chonqing VIP Information, Co., Ltd. databases were searched with entries until 10 July 2018 considered. Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included. Meta-analyses were performed to compare the effects of acupuncture with those of conventional treatment (including AT or other non-acupuncture therapies). The primary outcomes, including tear break-up time (BUT), Schirmer's I test (SIT) result and Symptom scores were analyzed. Subgroup analysis was performed for periocular acupoints only and periocular acupoints plus body acupoints. A total of 12 studies comprising 900 participants were included. In the primary meta-analysis, a significant improvement in the BUT [n=1,209, weighted mean difference (WMD)=1.01, 95% CI: 0.56-1.84, P<0.00001], SIT result (n=1,107, WMD=1.98, 95% CI: 0.44-3.34, P<0.00001) and Symptom scores (n=402, WMD=-1.02, 95% CI: -1.33 to -0.72, P<0.00001) was obtained to evaluate the clinical efficacy of acupuncture and AT. Furthermore, periocular acupoints plus body acupoints were more effective in the treatment of DED. However, the total sample size of subjects with only periocular acupoints in the treatment of DED was too small to get any firm conclusions. Further large RCTs are warranted. Copyright: © Wei et al.Entities:
Keywords: acupoint selection; acupuncture; dry eye; meta-analysis; systematic review
Year: 2020 PMID: 32256769 PMCID: PMC7086192 DOI: 10.3892/etm.2020.8561
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Exp Ther Med ISSN: 1792-0981 Impact factor: 2.447
Figure 1Flow diagram of the study selection process. RCT, randomized controlled trial.
Baseline characteristics of the randomized controlled trials included in the meta-analysis that investigated the effects of acupuncture in dry eye disease.
| First author (year) | Country | Sample size[ | Gender (M/F) | Mean age (range) | Duration (m or y)[ | Treatment regime in intervention group | Treatment regime in control group | Major outcomes | (Refs.) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nepp (1998) | Austria | 52 (30/22) | NA | NA | NA | Acupuncture | AT | BUT, SIT, drop frequency | ( |
| Wang (2005) | China | 45 (15/15/15) | Intervention 1 (7/8) Intervention 2 (5/10) Control (5/10) | Intervention 1 51.7 (27-75) Intervention 2 51.8 (24-74) Control 51.5 (30-73) | Intervention 1 6m-10y Intervention 2 6m-10y Control 2m-10y | Acupuncture | AT | BUT, SIT, and CFS | ( |
| Tseng (2006) | China (Taiwan) | 43 (17/17/9) | Intervention 1 (4/13) Intervention 2 (6/11) Control (6/3) | Intervention 1 52.24 Intervention 2 47.58 Control 51.33 | Intervention 1 2.65±1.80 y Intervention 2 3.24±3.17 y Control 4.00±3.35 y | Intervention 1: SSP + AT, Intervention 2: Acupuncture + AT | AT | BUT, SIT, VAS, overall score of eye condition | ( |
| Shi (2012) | China | 68 (33/35) | Intervention (14/19) Control (16/19) | Intervention 47.4 (29-63) Control 51.4 (27-65) | NA | Acupuncture | AT | ST, BUT, tear lactoferrin concentration | ( |
| Kim (2012) | South Korea | 150 (75/75) | Intervention (22/53) Control (19/56 | Intervention 47.95 Control 46.05 | NA | Acupuncture | AT | OSDI, VAS, BUT, SIT, QOL | ( |
| Liao (2013) | China | 40 (0/40) | Intervention (0/20) Control (0/20) | Intervention 52.7 (45-55) Control 53.1 (45-55) | NA | Acupuncture + AT | AT | BUT, SIT, symptoms score, VRQOL | ( |
| Nan (2014) | China | 60 (30/30) | Intervention (12/18) Control (13/17 | Intervention 48.57 (24-68) Control 47.56 (22-66) | Intervention 9.15 m (2 m-8 y) Control 10.55 m (3 m-9 y) | Eye acupuncture + AT | AT | ST, BUT, total score | ( |
| Zeng (2014) | China | 52 (28/24) | Intervention (13/15) Control (11/13 | Intervention 33 (28-41) Control 31 (27-39) | Intervention 4-14 Control 6-18m | Acupuncture + AT | AT | BUT, SIT, FLS | ( |
| Shang (2015) | China | 148 (72/76) | Intervention (40/32) Control (38/38 | Intervention 38 (24-61) Control 40 (21-64) | Intervention 4.3 y (3 m-19 y) Control 4.6y(2m-22y) | Acupuncture | AT | Symptoms score, VAS | ( |
| Xiang (2016) | China | 88 (44/44) | Intervention (20/24) Control (16/28) | Intervention 34.27 (20-64) Control 36.11 (22-59) | Intervention 15.07 (3-48) m Control 13.30 (3-48) m | Acupuncture | AT | OSDI, BUT, SIT, FLS | ( |
| Liu (2017) | China | 28 (14/14) | Intervention (0/14) Control (0/14) | Intervention 60.714 Control 60.786 | Intervention 3.857±3.225y Control 3.786±3.011y | Acupuncture + AT | AT | SIT, BUT, OSDI, scores of symptoms and signs, protein analysis | ( |
| Huang (2013) | China | 126 (64/62) | Intervention (23/41) Control (20/42) | Intervention 42.32 (19-62) Control 41.18 (20-61) | Intervention 6.08 (1-15) m Control 5.17 (1-14) m | Electroacupuncture | AT | Symptoms score, BUT, SIT, FLS | ( |
aSample size (number in intervention group/number in control group). NA, not available; AT, artificial tears; SIT, Schirmer's I test; BUT, tear break-up time; CFS, corneal fluorescein staining; OSDI, ocular surface disease index; VAS, Visual Analogue Scale; QOL, Quality of Life; VRQOL, vision-related quality of life; SSP, silver spike point; M, male; F, female; m, months; y, years.
bDuration: median (range), mean ± SD, range.
Details of acupuncture treatment characteristics of the randomized controlled trials included in the present meta-analysis.
| First author (year) | Acupoints | Treatment frequency | Therapeutic course | Duration of acupuncture (min) | Insertion depth | Needle type | De-qi | (Refs.) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nepp (1998) | Periocular acupoints: GB 1, BL 2, EX-HN2; other acupoints: ST 5, LI 4, SI 3, LI 3, KI 6, TE 5 | Intervention: 1 time per week; Control: NA | Intervention: 10 weeks Control: NA | 30 | NA | NA | NA | ( |
| Wang (2005) | Acupuncture 1: Heat ablaze and yin injury: LI 11, LI 4, SP 6, KI 3, ST 2, LI 20; Phlegm and blood | Intervention 1: Once in 2 days, 10 times/course, 10 days' rest after; | Intervention 1: 3 courses; Intervention 2: a course | 20-25 | NA | NA | NA | ( |
| stasis: ST 2, SP 10, SP 9, ST 36, SP 6, ST 40; Acupuncture 2: BL 2, TE 23, GB 14, ST 1 | Intervention 2: Once in 2 days, 10 times/course, 10 days rest after a; course Control: 5 times a day | 3 courses; Control: 30 days | ||||||
| Tseng (2006) | Periocular acupoints: EX-HN5, TE 23, GB 14, ST 2; other acupoints: SP 6 | Intervention 1: Twice a week, 2-3 days apart; Intervention 2: Twice a week, 2-3 days apart; Control: NA | Intervention 1: 8 weeks; Intervention 2: 8 weeks; Control: NA | 20 | NA | Points on the face: No. 36 one-inch needles, the lower extremities: No. 32 two-inch needles | De-qi | ( |
| Shi (2012) | Periocular acupoints: ST 1, BL 1, EX-HN 5, TE 23; other acupoints: GV 20, LI 4, ST 36 | Intervention: 3 times per week; Control: 3-4 times a day | Intervention: 3 weeks; Control: 3 weeks | 25 | NA | 40x0.25 mm disposable acupuncture needles | NA | ( |
| Kim (2012) | Periocular acupoints: ST 1, BL 2, TE 23, GB 14, Ex 1, GV 23; other acupoints: GB 20, LI 4, LI 11 | Intervention: 3 times per week; Control: Use as required (at least once per day) | Intervention: 4 weeks; Control: 4 weeks | 20 | The acupuncture points at the face and head: 0.6 to 3 cm, and 3 to 4.5 cm for points of hand (LI 4) and arm (LI 11). | 0.20x30 mm disposable acupuncture needles | De-qi | ( |
| Liao (2013) | Periocular acupoints: BL 1, ST 1, TE 23 penetrating EX-HN4; other acupoints: KI 3, LR 3, SP 6, ST 36 | Intervention: 1 time a day; Control: 4 times a day | Intervention: 14 days; Control: 14 days | 30 | NA | NA | NA | ( |
| Nan (2014) | Eye acupuncture (liver area, gallbladder area, kidney area, spleen stomach area, upper jiao area) | Intervention: 1 time a day; Control: 5 times a day | Intervention: 20 days; Control: 20 days | 15-20 | Liver area and gallbladder area: 0.5 cun | 0.18x13 mm disposable acupuncture needles | NA | ( |
| Zeng (2014) | Periocular acupoints: GB 1, BL 1, LI 20, BL 2, ST 2, EX-HN5; other acupoints: SP 6, SP 10, ST 36, KI 3 | Intervention: Acupuncture 1 time a day, Tears Naturale II 3 times a day, Refresh plus 1 time a day; Control: Tears Naturale II 3 times a day, Refresh Plus 1 time a day | Intervention: 10 days; Control: 10 days | NA | BL 1: 0.5 cun, GB 1: 0.7 cun | NA | De-qi | ( |
| Shang (2015) | Periocular acupoints: phenomaxillary ganglia, BL 1, EX-HN5, ST 2 | Intervention: acupuncture 1 time per week; Control: AT 1 time a day | Intervention: 24 weeks; Control: 15 days | NA | Phenomaxillary ganglia: 55 mm | Phenomaxillary ganglia: 0.35x60 mm needles | De-qi | ( |
| Xiang (2016) | Periocular acupoints: phenomaxillary ganglia, BL 2, Shangjingming (Extra), TE 23, ST 2 | Intervention: First week: Continuous acupuncture 5 times, and the rest 2 weeks: 3 times a week (1 time every other day); Control: AT 4 times a day | Intervention: 3 weeks; Control: 3 weeks | 30 | Phenomaxillary ganglia: 50 mm | Phenomaxillary ganglia: 0.25x60 mm, periocular acupoints: 0.25x25 mm | De-qi | ( |
| Liu (2017) | Periocular acupoints: BL 1, BL 2, TE 23, EX-HN5, ST 2, ST 1; other acupoints: LI 4, GB 20, GV 20 | Intervention: Acupuncture three times a week, AT: NA; Control: NA | Intervention: 8 weeks; Control: 8 weeks | 30 | NA | NA | NA | ( |
| Huang (2013) | Periocular acupoints: EX-HN5, ST 1, BL 1, BL 2, Ex-HN7; the acupoints: LU 7, GB 37, KI 3, LR 3; Ex-HN5 and ST 1 were connected to EA apparatus | Intervention: 1 time a day; Control: 4 times a day | Intervention: 30 times; Control: 30 times | 30 | NA | 40 mm disposable acupuncture needles | De-qi | ( |
Total sample size (number in intervention group/number in control group); NA, not available/not specified; AT, artificial tears; EA, electroacupuncture.
Figure 2Risk of bias graph.
Figure 3Risk of bias summary.
Figure 4Forest plot for comparison of BUT between acupuncture and artificial tears. BUT, tear break-up time; IV, inverse variance; SD, standard deviation; df, degrees of freedom.
Figure 5Forest plot for comparison of SIT results between acupuncture and artificial tears. IV, inverse variance; SD, standard deviation; df, degrees of freedom; SIT, Schirmer's I test.
Figure 6Forest plot for comparison of symptoms score between acupuncture and artificial tears. IV, inverse variance; SD, standard deviation; df, degrees of freedom.