| Literature DB >> 32256215 |
C Martín-Sierra1,2,3, R Martins4,5,6,7, M Coucelo8, A M Abrantes6,7, R C Oliveira6,7,9, J G Tralhão4,5,6,7, M F Botelho6,7, E Furtado4, M R Domingues10, A Paiva1,2,3,11, P Laranjeira1,2,3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Chronic inflammation is involved in the initiation and progression of various cancers, including liver cancer. The current study focuses on the characterization of the peripheral immune response in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) patients, before and after surgical procedure, in order to assess the effect of tumor resection in the immune system homeostasis and to determine possible prognostic factors associated with high-grade tumors. We developed a whole-blood assay to monitor immune alterations and functional competence of peripheral monocytes in a group of 10 healthy individuals (HG), in 20 HCC patients and 8 CCA patients, by multi-color flow cytometry, qRT-PCR, and ELISA techniques.Entities:
Keywords: Cholangiocarcinoma; Circulating monocytes; Flow cytometry; Hepatocellular carcinoma; TNFα; qRT-PCR
Year: 2020 PMID: 32256215 PMCID: PMC7106708 DOI: 10.1186/s12950-020-00243-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Inflamm (Lond) ISSN: 1476-9255 Impact factor: 4.981
Frequency (%) and absolute numbers (cells/ μL) of peripheral blood monocyte subsets in cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients, both at the time of surgical procedure (T0) and once the patients were recovered from surgery (T1), and in healthy individuals (HG). Frequencies of monocyte subsets are related to the total of monocytes
| CCA | HCC | HG | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T0 | T1 | T0 | T1 | ||
| % Monocytes (in whole blood) | 8,2 (5,7–12) | ||||
| Monocytes/μL | 353 (127–733) | 503 (285–757) | |||
| % Classical | 89 (76–98) | 84 (75–92) | 83 (70–88) | ||
| Classical monocytes/μL | 318 (129–1361)c | 264 (102–601) | 393 (171–651) | ||
| % Intermediate | 4,4 (0,3–14) | 7,3 (4,8–12) | 2,5 (0,5–42) | 4,8 (1,7–13) | 5,5 (2,8-8,2) |
| Intermediate monocytes/μL | 12 (0,8–194) | 13 (5,8–79) | 23 (17–51) | ||
| % HLADR+ Intermediate | 32 (23–83) | 44 (33–63) | 38 (23–80) | 33 (13–56) | |
| % HLADR++ Intermediate | 68 (17–77) | 56 (37–67) | 62 (20–77) | 68 (44–87) | |
| % Non-Classical | 5,0 (1,1–14) | 11 (5,2–28) | |||
| Non-classical monocytes/μL | 61 (26–84) | ||||
Independent-samples Mann-Whitney U test was performed to compare: each group of patients vs healthy group (a); CCA vs HCC (b), The Wilcoxon test was performed to compare T1 vs T0 (c), all of them with a significance level of 0.05 (p < 0.05). The results are given by median (minimum value-maximum value)
Fig. 1Phenotypic and functional characterization of circulating monocyte subsets. a Bivariate dot plot histograms illustrating the identification of circulating leukocyte subsets: eosinophils (light pink events), neutrophils (yellow events), classical monocytes (blue events), intermediate monocytes (light green events), non-classical monocytes (orange events), myeloid dendritic cells (mDCs, light blue events), lymphocytes (purple events), and basophils (green events), and an example bivariate dot plot histogram illustrating TNFα production (indicated with dashed rectangle) by classical monocytes after stimulation with LPS and IFN-γ. b Dot plots with the frequency of classical monocytes, intermediate monocytes with mid-level surface expression of HLA-DR (HLADR+), intermediate monocytes presenting high-level surface expression of HLA-DR (HLADR++) and non-classical monocytes producing TNFα, after stimulation with LPS plus IFNγ, in cholangiocarcinoma (CCA, N = 8) and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC, N = 20) patients, both at T0 and T1, and in the healthy group (HG, N = 10). Statistically significant differences were considered when p < 0.05; * between the groups indicated in the figure and the HG
Fig. 2Gene expression in purified classical, intermediate and non-classical monocyte subsets. a Dot plots with the mRNA expression levels of CX3CR1 and TNFα in classical, intermediate and non-classical monocytes purified from CCA (N = 8) and HCC (N = 20) patients, at T0 and T1, and from the HG (N = 10). Statistically significant differences were considered when p < 0.05; * between the groups indicated in the figure and the HG; # between T0 and T1. b Dot plots with the mRNA expression levels of TNFα in classical, intermediate and non-classical monocytes purified from CCA and HCC patients, at T0, comparing G1-G2 versus G3-G4 tumor histopathological grades. Statistically significant differences were considered when p < 0.05; * between the groups indicated in the figure
Fig. 3Quantification of the serum levels of CCL2, CCL20, CXCL10 and TNFα. a Dot plots with serum levels of CCL2, CCL20, CXCL10 and TNFα, measured by ELISA in serum samples from cholangiocarcinoma (CCA, N = 8) and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC, N = 20) patients, at T0 and T1, and from the healthy group (HG, N = 10). Statistically significant differences were considered when p < 0.05; *between the groups indicated in the figure and the HG; #between CCA and HCC at the same time point. b Dot plots with serum levels of TNFα, measured in CCA (N = 8) and HCC (N = 20) patients, at T0, comparing G1-G2 versus G3-G4 tumor histopathological grades. Statistically significant differences were considered when p < 0.05; * between the groups indicated in the figure
Clinical data from hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) patients enrolled in this study. Number of patients and frequencies (%) are indicated
| CCA | HCC | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Stage I | 1 (13%) | 3 (15%) | |
| Stage II | 4 (50%) | 15 (75%) | |
| Stage IIIA | 0 (0%) | 1 (5%) | |
| Stage IV | 3 (38%) | 1 (5%) | |
| G1 | 2 (25%) | 2 (10%) | |
| G2 | 3 (38%) | 11 (55%) | |
| G3 | 3 (38%) | 6 (30%) | |
| G4 | 0 (0%) | 1 (5%) | |
| Positive | 0 (0%) | 1 (5%) | |
| Positive | 0 (0%) | 6 (30%) | |
| Positive | – | 8 (40%) | |
| 0 (0%) | 15 (75%) | ||
| 3 (38%) | 1 (5%) | ||
| 3 (38%) | 2 (10%) | ||
| 0 (0%) | 7 (35%) | ||