| Literature DB >> 32256178 |
Wei Zhang1, Hongyan Shu2, Lixin Fang1, Ning Tang1, Yucai Li1, Bingrong Guo1, Fanhui Meng2.
Abstract
To minimize the incidence and mortality of cancer, dye trace method was used to explore the mechanism of drug inhibition. 60 mice were selected as the research objects and randomly divided into five groups: model group, shikonin group, aconitine group, notoginsenoside R1 group, and compound group. When establishing the model, begin to administrate the medicine by gavage. The permeability of lung barrier was measured, and H.E staining, immunohistochemical staining, and Western blot test were carried out. The results showed that the mice in model group had decreased autonomic activity, increased permeability of the lung barrier, white nodules on the lung tissue, decreased protein expression related to cell proliferation and differentiation, and decreased protein expression associated with cell proliferation and differentiation, increased expression of related proteins in cancer stem cells, and low level of cell-linked communication. And the incidence of lung cancer in the model group mice was 100%. The histopathological changes in mice were improved to varying degrees after the intervention of the three drugs. Especially in the compound group, the incidence of lung cancer decreased to 8.3%. This study demonstrated that the combination of shikonin, aconitine and notoginsenoside R1 had a good anti-cancer effect, which provided a theoretical basis for clinical research.Entities:
Keywords: Cancer inhibition mechanism; Dye tracer method; Lung cancer; Mouse model
Year: 2020 PMID: 32256178 PMCID: PMC7105657 DOI: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2019.12.040
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Saudi J Biol Sci ISSN: 1319-562X Impact factor: 4.219
Fig. 1Weight recording of different groups of mice during the experiment. (A: Body weight of model group during the experiment B: Body weight of shikonin group during the experiment C: Body weight of aconitine group during the experiment D: Body weight of notoginsenoside R1 group during the experiment E: Body weight of compound group during the experiment).
Fig. 2Autonomous activity scores of different groups of mice during the experiment. (A: Autonomous activity score of model group during the experiment B: Autonomous activity score of shikonin group during the experiment C: Autonomous activity score of aconitine group during the experiment D: Autonomous activity score of notoginsenoside R1 group during the experiment E: Autonomous activity score of compound group during the experiment).
Fig. 3Effects of different drugs on urethane-induced lung cancer. (A: effects of different drugs on the incidence of lung cancer in mice B: effects of different drugs on lung barrier permeability of mouse lung cancer).
Fig. 4Picture of lung tissue and HE staining of mice in each group. (A: lung tissue and HE staining of model group mice B: lung tissue and HE staining of shikonin group mice C: lungs tissue and HE staining of aconitine group mouse D: lung tissue and HE staining of mice in the Panax notoginseng R1 group E: lung tissue and HE staining of the mice in the compound group).
Fig. 5Immunohistochemical results. (A: Immunohistochemical expression of ki67 in each group B: Semi-quantitative analysis of immunohistochemical expression of ki67 in each group C: Immunohistochemical expression of Cleaved caspase-3 in each group D: Semi-quantitative analysis of immunohistochemical expression of Cleaved caspase-3 in each group).
Fig. 6Protein expression in lung tissue of mice in each group. (A: electrophoretogram of connexin43 and E-cadherin protein expression B: quantitative analysis of connexin43 protein expression C: quantitative analysis of E-cadherin protein expression D: electrophoretogram of Oct4 and Nanog protein expression E: Quantitative analysis of Oct4 protein expression F: Quantitative analysis of Nanog protein expression).
Fig. 7Effect of three drugs on intercellular communication of urethane-induced cells.