| Literature DB >> 32256164 |
Muhammad Fazal Karim1, Pengfei Hao1, Nur Hazidah Binti Nordin1, Chengwei Qiu1, Muhammad Zeeshan1, Alamgir Akhtar Khan2, Imran Haider Shamsi1.
Abstract
Carbon dioxide (CO2) concentration in greenhouses is sub-optimal for vegetable production. Many techniques have been used to increase CO2 concentration in greenhouses but most of them are expensive with certain limitations and drawbacks. We adopted a new strategy to elevate CO2 concentration in the greenhouse throughout the day via crop residues and animal manure composting (CRAM). During the whole cultivation period, CRAM-treated greenhouse had doubled CO2 concentration which significantly increased the yield of cherry tomatoes (Lycopersiconesculentum L.) i.e. up to 38%. The influence of CRAM procedure on cherry tomato quality was also investigated and the concentrations of total soluble solids (TSS) and soluble sugar were found to be significantly higher in cherry tomatoes grown under composting greenhouse than that of non-composting greenhouse. Additionally, CRAM-CO2 enrichment also resulted in increased concentrations of ascorbic acid (Vitamin C) and titrate acid as compared with the control. In contrast, the concentration of nitrate was considerably decreased in cherry tomato grown under CO2 enriched condition than that of control. The increase in active oxygen metabolisms such as POD, CAT and SOD while a decrease in MDA, as well as APX was observed for cherry tomatoes grown under CO2 enriched condition. Hence, CO2 fertilization by using CRAM in greenhouse significantly improved quality and increased the yield of cherry tomatoes.Entities:
Keywords: Animal manure; CO2 enrichment; Cherry tomato; Crop residues; Quality; Yield
Year: 2020 PMID: 32256164 PMCID: PMC7105663 DOI: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2020.02.020
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Saudi J Biol Sci ISSN: 1319-562X Impact factor: 4.219
Basic Physico-chemical parameters of experimental soil.
| Soil physiological index | Control | +CO2 (CRAM) |
|---|---|---|
| OM (%) | 5.2 | 7.04 |
| Total N (gkg−1) | 0.26 | 0.35 |
| NH4+-N (mgkg−1) | 4.36 | 5.91 |
| NO3–-N (mgkg−1) | 3.54 | 4.8 |
| Available P (mgkg−1) | 2.3 | 3.12 |
| Available K (mgkg−1) | 42.26 | 55.06 |
| TOC (%) | 3.01 | 4.08 |
| PH | 6.86 | 6.98 |
| EC (mgL−1) | 6.15 | 6.54 |
Effects of CO2 enrichment by fermentation of CRAM on growth of cherry tomato.
| Treat. | Seedling | Transplant | CRAM | First flower | First harvest | End harvest |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Year. Month. Day | ||||||
| Control | 2016.11.05 | 2016.11.20 | 2017.01.15 | 2017.03.02 | 2017.03.20 | 2017.06.20 |
| +CO2 | 2016.11.05 | 2016.11.20 | 2017.01.15 | 2017.02.25 | 2017.03.12 | 2017.06.15 |
Control and +CO2 correspond to normal condition and CO2 enrichment by fermentation of CRAM.
Fig. 1Graphical abstract of CRAM procedure in the greenhouse for the production of CO2.
Effects of CO2 enrichment by fermentation of CRAM on morphological traits of cherry tomato.
| Treat. | Plant height (cm) | Stem diameter (cm) | Leaf width (cm) | Chlorophyll |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 76.7 | 1.12 | 49.7 | 42.1 |
| +CO2 | 105.0** | 1.31** | 56.7** | 46.9** |
Control and +CO2 correspond to normal condition and CO2 enrichment by fermentation of CRAM. *and **, indicate significant differences between +CO2 and control at significant levels of 0.05 and 0.01, respectively.
Fig. 2Morphology of cherry tomato plants at the flowering stage under control (A) and CO2 enrichment (B) condition. Control and +CO2 correspond to normal condition and CO2 enrichment by fermentation of CRAM.
Effects of CO2 enrichment by fermentation of CRAM on yield traits of cherry tomato.
| Treatment | Single fruit weight (g) | Fruit diameter (cm) | Fruit number | Yield (kg/hm2) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 13.8 | 3 | 12.2 | 1300 |
| +CO2 | 19.0* | 3.6* | 27.4** | 1800* |
Control and +CO2 correspond to normal condition and CO2 enrichment by fermentation of CRAM. *and **, indicate significant differences between +CO2 and control at significant levels of 0.05 and 0.01, respectively.
Fig. 3Difference of mature cherry tomato fruit in control greenhouse and CRAM-CO2 treatment greenhouse. (Scale bar is 1 cm).
Fig. 4Effects of CO Control and +CO2 correspond to normal condition and CO2 enrichment by fermentation of CRAM. *, indicates significant differences between +CO2 and control at the level of 0.05.
Effects of CO2 enrichment by fermentation of CRAM on photosynthetic characteristics of cherry tomato.
| Treatment | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 17.8 | 0.4 | 313.8 | 3.5 |
| +CO2 | 21.4* | 0.7* | 341.2* | 5.0* |
Control and +CO2 correspond to normal condition and CO2 enrichment by fermentation of CRAM. *, indicate significant differences between +CO2 and control at 0.05.
Fig. 5Effect of CO Control and +CO2 correspond to normal condition and CO2 enrichment by fermentation of CRAM. *, indicates significant differences between +CO2 and control at 0.05.