Literature DB >> 32255991

The Forgotten Joint Score-12 in Anterior Cruciate Ligament injuries.

Jia Ying Lee1, Yi Mei Low2, Lei Jiang1, Zi Yang Chia1, Ying Hao3, Denny Lie1, Paul Chang1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The Forgotten Joint Score (FJS-12) is a scoring system initially created to assess post arthroplasty outcomes. It has since been used to evaluate Anterior Cruciate Ligament surgery outcomes. Our study aims to evaluate the applicability and validity of the FJS-12 in post Anterior Cruciate Ligament reconstructed patients, and to assess correlation with established Patient Reported Outcome Measure Scores in the same population.
DESIGN: Case series, level 3 evidence.
METHODS: We conducted a cross sectional study across patients who had undergone Anterior Cruciate Ligament reconstruction and carried out the FJS-12 questionnaire by phone interview. Patients who had undergone primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament reconstruction were considered for the study.
RESULTS: The average Forgotten Joint Score-12 for all 82 patients was 71.4 (±22.9), which corresponded to a normal distribution. The average Lysholm and Tegner score at the 2-year post-operative visit was 93.5 ± 9.5 and 5.8 ± 1.8 respectively and the distribution was non-normal. We noticed a large ceiling effect of 42.7% in the Lysholm scores, but only 8.4% in FJS-12. There was a weak correlation with Lysholm and a positive correlation with Tegner.
CONCLUSIONS: Forgotten Joint Score-12 seems to be a promising patient reported outcome measure that can be used in evaluating post Anterior Cruciate Ligament reconstruction outcomes. It is more discerning than traditional scores and is easy to administer thus it can used in the clinical follow-up of patients. With the scores being normally distributed, it makes for a meaningful PROMS and would allow more accurate application of parametric statistical tests.
© 2020 Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of Professor P K Surendran Memorial Education Foundation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ACL, Anterior Cruciate Ligament; Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction; FJS-12, Forgotten Joint Score - 12 questions; Forgotten joint score; General sports trauma; Knee; Ligaments; PROMS, Patient Reported Outcome Measure Scores; Patient reported outcome

Year:  2020        PMID: 32255991      PMCID: PMC7114623          DOI: 10.1016/j.jor.2020.03.029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop        ISSN: 0972-978X


  15 in total

1.  Understanding a Normal Distribution of Data.

Authors:  Mitchell G Maltenfort
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2015-12

2.  The "forgotten joint" as the ultimate goal in joint arthroplasty: validation of a new patient-reported outcome measure.

Authors:  Henrik Behrend; Karlmeinrad Giesinger; Johannes M Giesinger; Markus S Kuster
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2011-10-13       Impact factor: 4.757

3.  The validity and reliability of the modified forgotten joint score.

Authors:  Patrick G Robinson; Conor S Rankin; Jonathan Lavery; Iain Anthony; Mark Blyth; Bryn Jones
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2018-03-27

4.  The logarithm in biology. 1. Mechanisms generating the log-normal distribution exactly.

Authors:  A L Koch
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1966-11       Impact factor: 2.691

5.  A Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Patellar Tendon, Hamstring Tendon, and Double-Bundle ACL Reconstructions: Patient-Reported and Clinical Outcomes at 5-Year Follow-up.

Authors:  Nicholas G Mohtadi; Denise S Chan
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2019-06-05       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Joint awareness after ACL reconstruction: patient-reported outcomes measured with the Forgotten Joint Score-12.

Authors:  Henrik Behrend; Vilijam Zdravkovic; Johannes M Giesinger; Karlmeinrad Giesinger
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Eight-year results of transtibial nonanatomic single-bundle versus double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Clinical, radiologic outcomes and survivorship.

Authors:  Kyoung Ho Yoon; Jung Suk Kim; Sang Jun Kim; Moonsu Park; Soo Yeon Park; Sang Eon Park
Journal:  J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong)       Date:  2019 May-Aug       Impact factor: 1.118

8.  Comparison of the ceiling effect in the Lysholm score and the IKDC subjective score for assessing functional outcome after ACL reconstruction.

Authors:  Ho Jong Ra; Hyoung Soo Kim; Jung Yun Choi; Jeong Ku Ha; Ji Yeong Kim; Jin Goo Kim
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2014-06-21       Impact factor: 2.199

9.  Simplified Chinese version of the Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) for patients who underwent joint arthroplasty: cross-cultural adaptation and validation.

Authors:  Shiqi Cao; Ning Liu; Wuxiang Han; Yunpeng Zi; Fan Peng; Lexiang Li; Qiwei Fu; Yi Chen; Weijie Zheng; Qirong Qian
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2017-01-14       Impact factor: 2.359

10.  Long term results after double and single bundle ACL reconstruction: Is there any difference? A meta - analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Zhenyue Dong; Yingzhen Niu; Jianchao Qi; Yifan Song; Fei Wang
Journal:  Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc       Date:  2019-01-25       Impact factor: 1.511

View more
  2 in total

1.  Joint awareness and return to pre-injury level of activities after ACL reconstruction in athletes vs non-athletes.

Authors:  Lakshmana Das; Anant Shiv Johri; V Abdusamad; Alexander Schuh; Tarun Goyal
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2022-02-04

2.  Reliable Internal Consistency and Adequate Validity of the Forgotten Joint Score-12 after Primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair.

Authors:  Harmen D Vermeijden; Xiuyi A Yang; Jelle P van der List; Gregory S DiFelice
Journal:  Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil       Date:  2021-05-05
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.