| Literature DB >> 32255970 |
Nyoman Sadra Dharmawan1, I Made Damriyasa1, I Gede Mahardika2, Kadek Swastika3, Luh Putu Hartiningsih1, Kadek Karang Agustina1,4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM: Taenia saginata hazardously affects human and animal health. The distribution of this disease is found almost all over the world. The study aimed to obtain epidemiological information concerning prevalence and the distribution of bovine cysticercosis in Bali and Nusa Tenggara, Indonesia.Entities:
Keywords: Bali cattle; Taenia saginata; bovine cysticercosis; risk factor
Year: 2020 PMID: 32255970 PMCID: PMC7096293 DOI: 10.14202/vetworld.2020.284-289
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Vet World ISSN: 0972-8988
Seroprevalence of bovine cysticercosis in Bali, West Nusa Tenggara, and East Nusa Tenggara.
| Bali | West Nusa Tenggara | East Nusa Tenggara | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Originated | ±/n | % | Originated | ±/n | % | Originated | ±/n | % |
| Buleleng | 1/10 | 10 | Lembar | 2/36 | 5.55 | Timor Tengah Selatan | 6/47 | 12.77 |
| Karangasem | 0/10 | 0 | Gerung | 1/13 | 7.69 | Kupang | 1/37 | 2.70 |
| Badung | 0/10 | 0 | Jakem | 0/1 | 0 | |||
| Tabanan | 0/10 | 0 | Labuhan Badas | 0/2 | 0 | |||
| Gianyar | 2/11 | 18.18 | Empang | 0/3 | 0 | |||
| Bangli | 0/10 | 0 | Plampang | 1/4 | 25.00 | |||
| Denpasar | 2/10 | 20 | Lape | 0/6 | 0 | |||
| Klungkung | 2/10 | 20 | Moyo Hulu | 0/15 | 0 | |||
| Moyo Utara | 0/6 | 0 | ||||||
| Moyo Hilir | 0/6 | 0 | ||||||
| Total | 7/91 | 7.69 | Total | 4/92 | 4.35 | Total | 7/84 | 8.33 |
Figure-1Results of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay examination and absorbent values of antibody response against Taenia saginata from cattle sera obtained from Bali.
Figure-2Results of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay examination and absorbent values of antibody response against Taenia saginata from cattle sera obtained from West Nusa Tenggara (a) and East Nusa Tenggara (b).
The odds ratio factors of cattle sex, farming type, age, physical condition, origin of drinking water, condition of the cage, and availability of latrines for cattle owners.
| Risk factors | Positive | Negative | p-value | Odds ratio | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| n | % | n | % | |||
| Sex of cattle | ||||||
| Female | 1 | 1.54 | 64 | 98.46 | ||
| Male | 6 | 23.07 | 20 | 76.93 | 0.008 | 19.200 |
| Farming type | ||||||
| Breeding | 2 | 3.13 | 62 | 96.87 | ||
| Fattening | 5 | 18.52 | 22 | 81.48 | 0.025 | 7.045 |
| Age of cattle | ||||||
| Young | 3 | 7.32 | 38 | 92.68 | ||
| Old | 4 | 8.00 | 46 | 92.00 | 0.903 | 1.101 |
| Physical condition of cattle | ||||||
| Thin and medium | 5 | 7.46 | 62 | 92.54 | ||
| Fat | 2 | 8.33 | 22 | 91.67 | 0.891 | 1.127 |
| Drinking water source | ||||||
| Tap water | 1 | 2.86 | 34 | 97.14 | ||
| River | 6 | 10.71 | 50 | 89.29 | 0.202 | 4.080 |
| Cage floor | ||||||
| Concrete | 1 | 3.23 | 30 | 96.77 | ||
| Soil | 6 | 10.00 | 54 | 90.00 | 0.275 | 3.333 |
| Availability of latrines | ||||||
| Available | 6 | 7.31 | 76 | 92.69 | ||
| Not | 1 | 11.11 | 8 | 88.89 | 0.687 | 1.583 |
Significant at p <0.01;
Significant at p <0.05