Literature DB >> 32255434

Therapist-Guided Telerehabilitation for Adult Cochlear Implant Users: Developmental and Feasibility Study.

Christiane Völter1, Christiane Schirmer1,2, Dorothee Hinsen3, Marieke Roeber3, Stefan Dazert1, Kerstin Bilda3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cochlear implants can provide auditory perception to many people with hearing impairment who derive insufficient benefits from hearing aid use. For optimal speech perception with a cochlear implant, postoperative auditory training is necessary to adapt the brain to the new sound transmitted by the implant. Currently, this training is usually conducted via face-to-face sessions in rehabilitation centers. With the aging of society, the prevalence of age-related hearing loss and the number of adults with cochlear implants are expected to increase. Therefore, augmenting face-to-face rehabilitation with alternative forms of auditory training may be highly valuable.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this multidisciplinary study was to evaluate the newly developed internet-based teletherapeutic multimodal system Train2hear, which enables adult cochlear implant users to perform well-structured and therapist-guided hearing rehabilitation sessions on their own.
METHODS: The study was conducted in 3 phases: (1) we searched databases from January 2005 to October 2018 for auditory training programs suitable for adult cochlear implant users; (2) we developed a prototype of Train2hear based on speech and language development theories; (3) 18 cochlear implant users (mean age 61, SD 15.4 years) and 10 speech and language therapists (mean age 34, SD 10.9 years) assessed the usability and the feasibility of the prototype. This was achieved via questionnaires, including the System Usability Scale (SUS) and a short version of the intrinsic motivation inventory (KIM) questionnaires.
RESULTS: The key components of the Train2hear training program are an initial analysis according to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health; a range of different hierarchically based exercises; and an automatic and dynamic adaptation of the different tasks according to the cochlear implant user's progress. In addition to motivational mechanisms (such as supportive feedback), the cochlear implant user and therapist receive feedback in the form of comprehensive statistical analysis. In general, cochlear implant users enjoyed their training as assessed by KIM scores (mean 19, SD 2.9, maximum 21). In terms of usability (scale 0-100), the majority of users rated the Train2hear program as excellent (mean 88, SD 10.5). Age (P=.007) and sex (P=.01) had a significant impact on the SUS score with regard to usability of the program. The therapists (SUS score mean 93, SD 9.2) provided slightly more positive feedback than the cochlear implant users (mean 85, SD 10.3).
CONCLUSIONS: Based on this first evaluation, Train2hear was well accepted by both cochlear implant users and therapists. Computer-based auditory training might be a promising cost-effective option that can provide a highly personalized rehabilitation program suited to individual cochlear implant user characteristics. ©Christiane Völter, Christiane Schirmer, Dorothee Hinsen, Marieke Roeber, Stefan Dazert, Kerstin Bilda. Originally published in JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technology (http://rehab.jmir.org), 28.05.2020.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cochlear implantation; computer-based auditory training; multimodal platform system; telerehabilitation

Year:  2020        PMID: 32255434     DOI: 10.2196/15843

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol        ISSN: 2369-2529


  6 in total

Review 1.  Guidance on Providing Patient-Centered Care.

Authors:  Kris English
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2022-07-26

2.  User-Dependent Usability and Feasibility of a Swallowing Training mHealth App for Older Adults: Mixed Methods Pilot Study.

Authors:  HyangHee Kim; Sang-Ho Lee; Nam-Bin Cho; Heecheon You; Teukgyu Choi; Jinwon Kim
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2020-07-27       Impact factor: 4.773

3.  Tablet-Based Telerehabilitation Versus Conventional Face-to-Face Rehabilitation After Cochlear Implantation: Prospective Intervention Pilot Study.

Authors:  Christiane Völter; Carolin Stöckmann; Christiane Schirmer; Stefan Dazert
Journal:  JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol       Date:  2021-03-12

4.  Poor Performer: A Distinct Entity in Cochlear Implant Users?

Authors:  Christiane Völter; Kirsten Oberländer; Imme Haubitz; Rebecca Carroll; Stefan Dazert; Jan Peter Thomas
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2022-05-09       Impact factor: 2.213

5.  Implementation of a Home-Based mHealth App Intervention Program With Human Mediation for Swallowing Tongue Pressure Strengthening Exercises in Older Adults: Longitudinal Observational Study.

Authors:  HyangHee Kim; Nam-Bin Cho; Jinwon Kim; Kyung Min Kim; Minji Kang; Younggeun Choi; Minjae Kim; Heecheon You; Seok In Nam; Soyeon Shin
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2020-10-16       Impact factor: 4.773

6.  Interrupted cochlear implant habilitation due to COVID-19 pandemic-ways and means to overcome this.

Authors:  Ruchima Dham; Senthil Vadivu Arumugam; Sandhya Dharmarajan; Vijaya Krishnan Paramasivan; Mohan Kameswaran
Journal:  Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2020-08-25       Impact factor: 1.675

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.