Literature DB >> 32255334

Quantitative Imprint Mass Spectrometry Imaging of Endogenous Ceramides in Rat Brain Tissue with Kinetic Calibration.

Qian Wu1,2,3, Stanislav S Rubakhin1,2, Jonathan V Sweedler1,2.   

Abstract

Quantitative mass spectrometry imaging (MSI) is an effective technique for determining the spatial distribution of molecules in a variety of sample types; however, the quality of the ion signals is related to the chemical and morphological properties of the tissue and the targeted analyte(s). Issues may arise with the incorporation of standards into the tissue at repeatable, well-defined concentrations, as well as with the extraction and incorporation of endogenous analytes versus standards from tissue into the matrix. To address these concerns, we combine imprint MSI (iMSI) with kinetic calibration and use it to quantify lipids in rat brain tissue samples. Briefly, tissues were imprinted on slides coated with a dopamine-modified TiO2 monolith pretreated with analyte standards, resulting in the adsorption of endogenous analytes onto the coating and desorption of standards into the tissue. The incorporation of standards into the tissue enabled quantification of the measured analytes using kinetic calibration. Moreover, matrix effects were reduced, and the intensities of analyte standard signals became more uniform. The symmetry of the adsorption of endogenous ceramides and the desorption of ceramide standards suggest that the content of adsorbed endogenous ceramide can be determined by measuring the content of desorbed ceramide standard. Using kinetic calibration, endogenous ceramide concentrations were calculated for a range of dry and wet tissue imprinting conditions and compared to quantitative MSI using a standard spiking approach. We validated the relative quantitative values from iMSI using liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) and found that the ratios from iMSI as compared to LC-MS/MS were in the range of 70-200% over the concentration range of endogenous ceramides; the correlation coefficient between iMSI and LC-MS/MS was over 0.9 (Pearson's r), while the relative recoveries via traditional standard spiking were between 200% and 5000% depending on the brain region and sample preparation conditions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32255334      PMCID: PMC7250146          DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.0c00392

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anal Chem        ISSN: 0003-2700            Impact factor:   6.986


  36 in total

1.  A simple method for the isolation and purification of total lipides from animal tissues.

Authors:  J FOLCH; M LEES; G H SLOANE STANLEY
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1957-05       Impact factor: 5.157

2.  Determination of agrochemical compounds in soya plants by imaging matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionisation mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Alexander K Mullen; Malcolm R Clench; Susan Crosland; Kate R Sharples
Journal:  Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.419

Review 3.  Protein and peptides in pictures: imaging with MALDI mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Richard J A Goodwin; Stephen R Pennington; Andrew R Pitt
Journal:  Proteomics       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.984

4.  Preparation of lipide extracts from brain tissue.

Authors:  J FOLCH; I ASCOLI; M LEES; J A MEATH; N LeBARON
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1951-08       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 5.  Nondestructive sampling of living systems using in vivo solid-phase microextraction.

Authors:  Gangfeng Ouyang; Dajana Vuckovic; Janusz Pawliszyn
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2011-01-27       Impact factor: 60.622

6.  Dual strategy for reduced signal-suppression effects in matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry imaging.

Authors:  Joakim Bastrup; Svend Birkelund; Ayodeji A Asuni; Christiane Volbracht; Allan Stensballe
Journal:  Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom       Date:  2019-11-30       Impact factor: 2.419

7.  Multicenter Validation Study of Quantitative Imaging Mass Spectrometry.

Authors:  Jeremy A Barry; Rima Ait-Belkacem; William M Hardesty; Lydia Benakli; Clara Andonian; Hermes Licea-Perez; Jonathan Stauber; Stephen Castellino
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2019-04-15       Impact factor: 6.986

8.  Electrospun Nanofiber Mats as "Smart Surfaces" for Desorption Electrospray Ionization Mass Spectrometry (DESI MS)-Based Analysis and Imprint Imaging.

Authors:  R G Hemalatha; Mohd Azhardin Ganayee; T Pradeep
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2016-05-17       Impact factor: 6.986

9.  Method for simultaneous imaging of endogenous low molecular weight metabolites in mouse brain using TiO2 nanoparticles in nanoparticle-assisted laser desorption/ionization-imaging mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Kamlesh Shrivas; Takahiro Hayasaka; Yuki Sugiura; Mitsutoshi Setou
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2011-09-06       Impact factor: 6.986

10.  Absolute Quantitative MALDI Imaging Mass Spectrometry: A Case of Rifampicin in Liver Tissues.

Authors:  Chad W Chumbley; Michelle L Reyzer; Jamie L Allen; Gwendolyn A Marriner; Laura E Via; Clifton E Barry; Richard M Caprioli
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2016-02-05       Impact factor: 6.986

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Spatially resolved absolute quantitation in thin tissue by mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Vilmos Kertesz; John F Cahill
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2021-04       Impact factor: 4.142

2.  Mass spectrometry imaging: new eyes on natural products for drug research and development.

Authors:  Jin-Jun Hou; Zi-Jia Zhang; Wen-Yong Wu; Qing-Qing He; Teng-Qian Zhang; Ya-Wen Liu; Zhao-Jun Wang; Lei Gao; Hua-Li Long; Min Lei; Wan-Ying Wu; De-An Guo
Journal:  Acta Pharmacol Sin       Date:  2022-10-13       Impact factor: 7.169

Review 3.  Surface-assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry imaging: A review.

Authors:  Wendy H Müller; Alexandre Verdin; Edwin De Pauw; Cedric Malherbe; Gauthier Eppe
Journal:  Mass Spectrom Rev       Date:  2020-11-10       Impact factor: 9.011

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.