Literature DB >> 32253657

Ontology-Based Radiology Teaching File Summarization, Coverage, and Integration.

Priya Deshpande1, Alexander Rasin2, Jun Son2, Sungmin Kim2, Eli Brown2, Jacob Furst2, Daniela S Raicu2, Steven M Montner3, Samuel G Armato3.   

Abstract

Radiology teaching file repositories contain a large amount of information about patient health and radiologist interpretation of medical findings. Although valuable for radiology education, the use of teaching file repositories has been hindered by the ability to perform advanced searches on these repositories given the unstructured format of the data and the sparseness of the different repositories. Our term coverage analysis of two major medical ontologies, Radiology Lexicon (RadLex) and Unified Medical Language System (UMLS) Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine Clinical Terms (SNOMED CT), and two teaching file repositories, Medical Imaging Resource Community (MIRC) and MyPacs, showed that both ontologies combined cover 56.3% of terms in the MIRC and only 17.9% of terms in MyPacs. Furthermore, the overlap between the two ontologies (i.e., terms included by both the RadLex and UMLS SNOMED CT) was a mere 5.6% for the MIRC and 2% for the RadLex. Clustering the content of the teaching file repositories showed that they focus on different diagnostic areas within radiology. The MIRC teaching file covers mostly pediatric cases; a few cases are female patients with heart-, chest-, and bone-related diseases. The MyPacs contains a range of different diseases with no focus on a particular disease category, gender, or age group. MyPacs also provides a wide variety of cases related to the neck, face, heart, chest, and breast. These findings provide valuable insights on what new cases should be added or how existent cases may be integrated to provide more comprehensive data repositories. Similarly, the low-term coverage by the ontologies shows the need to expand ontologies with new terminology such as new terms learned from these teaching file repositories and validated by experts. While our methodology to organize and index data using clustering approaches and medical ontologies is applied to teaching file repositories, it can be applied to any other medical clinical data.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cluster analysis; Coverage analysis; Data integration; Medical ontologies; Radiology teaching files; Unsupervised machine learning

Year:  2020        PMID: 32253657      PMCID: PMC7256159          DOI: 10.1007/s10278-020-00331-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Digit Imaging        ISSN: 0897-1889            Impact factor:   4.056


  15 in total

1.  Unsupervised Topic Modeling in a Large Free Text Radiology Report Repository.

Authors:  Saeed Hassanpour; Curtis P Langlotz
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  Coverage and Readability of Information Resources to Help Patients Understand Radiology Reports.

Authors:  Teresa Martin-Carreras; Charles E Kahn
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2017-12-28       Impact factor: 5.532

3.  Fleischner Society: glossary of terms for thoracic imaging.

Authors:  David M Hansell; Alexander A Bankier; Heber MacMahon; Theresa C McLoud; Nestor L Müller; Jacques Remy
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2008-01-14       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Evaluating the completeness of RadLex in the chest radiography domain.

Authors:  Ryan W Woods; John Eng
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 3.173

5.  Comparing image search behaviour in the ARRS GoldMiner search engine and a clinical PACS/RIS.

Authors:  Maria De-Arteaga; Ivan Eggel; Bao Do; Daniel Rubin; Charles E Kahn; Henning Müller
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2015-05-19       Impact factor: 6.317

6.  Evaluating Completeness of a Radiology Glossary Using Iterative Refinement.

Authors:  Peter Y W Chan; Charles E Kahn
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 4.056

7.  From guidelines to practice: how reporting templates promote the use of radiology practice guidelines.

Authors:  Charles E Kahn; Marta E Heilbrun; Kimberly E Applegate
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 5.532

8.  Content analysis of reporting templates and free-text radiology reports.

Authors:  Yi Hong; Charles E Kahn
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 4.056

9.  Expanding a radiology lexicon using contextual patterns in radiology reports.

Authors:  Bethany Percha; Yuhao Zhang; Selen Bozkurt; Daniel Rubin; Russ B Altman; Curtis P Langlotz
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 4.497

10.  A survey of SNOMED CT implementations.

Authors:  Dennis Lee; Ronald Cornet; Francis Lau; Nicolette de Keizer
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2012-10-03       Impact factor: 6.317

View more
  1 in total

1.  Determining the applicability of the RSNA radiology lexicon (RadLex) in high-grade glioma MRI reporting-a preliminary study on 20 consecutive cases with newly diagnosed glioblastoma.

Authors:  Torge Huckhagel; Christine Stadelmann; Tammam Abboud; Christian Riedel
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2022-03-24       Impact factor: 2.795

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.