Tomas Da Silva1, Franziska Rummel2, Christian Knop2, Tobias Merkle2. 1. Department of Trauma Surgery and Orthopedics, Klinikum Stuttgart-Katharinenhospital, Kriegsbergstraße 60, 70174, Stuttgart, Germany. t.dasilva@klinikum-stuttgart.de. 2. Department of Trauma Surgery and Orthopedics, Klinikum Stuttgart-Katharinenhospital, Kriegsbergstraße 60, 70174, Stuttgart, Germany.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Humerus shaft fractures are common and often treated surgically with a proximal humerus internal locking system like the long PHILOS® plate. Due to its close anatomical proximity to the humerus, the radial nerve is particularly susceptible to traumatic and iatrogenic damage. The iatrogenic radial nerve damage associated with internal locking systems is described in about 7% of the cases. In order to avoid this lesion, helical plates have been suggested since 1999. This technique continues to not being used as standard as there is still a clear lack of evidence. This study aimed to understand if twisting a long PHILOS plate can reduce the rate of iatrogenic radial nerve damage in humerus shaft fractures. METHODS: In this 10-year retrospective comparative study, patients with primary traumatic proximal humerus shaft fracture treated with a straight or twisted helical PHILOS® plate were analyzed and compared. Among the 62 patients meeting the inclusion criteria between 2008 and 2018, 33 received a conventional straight plate, while 29 were treated with a helical plate. The primary endpoint was iatrogenic radial nerve damage immediately after surgery with a follow-up of at least 3 months. RESULTS: No case of radial nerve damage was reported in the helical group. In the control group, iatrogenic radial nerve damage occurred in two cases (6%), which was not statistically significant when comparing both groups (p = 0.18). CONCLUSION: Manually twisting long PHILOS® plates is a safe procedure to avoid radial nerve lesion in humerus shaft fractures. Even though the group size did not allow a statistically relevant difference, we underline that only the helical group showed no iatrogenic radial lesion. This technique deserves further attention. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 3, retrospective cohort study.
BACKGROUND: Humerus shaft fractures are common and often treated surgically with a proximal humerus internal locking system like the long PHILOS® plate. Due to its close anatomical proximity to the humerus, the radial nerve is particularly susceptible to traumatic and iatrogenic damage. The iatrogenic radial nerve damage associated with internal locking systems is described in about 7% of the cases. In order to avoid this lesion, helical plates have been suggested since 1999. This technique continues to not being used as standard as there is still a clear lack of evidence. This study aimed to understand if twisting a long PHILOS plate can reduce the rate of iatrogenic radial nerve damage in humerus shaft fractures. METHODS: In this 10-year retrospective comparative study, patients with primary traumatic proximal humerus shaft fracture treated with a straight or twisted helical PHILOS® plate were analyzed and compared. Among the 62 patients meeting the inclusion criteria between 2008 and 2018, 33 received a conventional straight plate, while 29 were treated with a helical plate. The primary endpoint was iatrogenic radial nerve damage immediately after surgery with a follow-up of at least 3 months. RESULTS: No case of radial nerve damage was reported in the helical group. In the control group, iatrogenic radial nerve damage occurred in two cases (6%), which was not statistically significant when comparing both groups (p = 0.18). CONCLUSION: Manually twisting long PHILOS® plates is a safe procedure to avoid radial nerve lesion in humerus shaft fractures. Even though the group size did not allow a statistically relevant difference, we underline that only the helical group showed no iatrogenic radial lesion. This technique deserves further attention. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 3, retrospective cohort study.