Andrea L Gold1, Rany Abend1, Jennifer C Britton1, Brigid Behrens1, Madeline Farber1, Emily Ronkin1, Gang Chen1, Ellen Leibenluft1, Daniel S Pine1. 1. Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, and Pediatric Anxiety Research Center, Bradley Hospital, Riverside, R.I. (Gold); Emotion and Development Branch, NIMH, Bethesda, Md. (Abend, Behrens, Farber, Ronkin, Leibenluft, Pine); Department of Psychology, University of Miami, Coral Gables, Fla. (Britton); Scientific and Statistical Computing Core, NIMH, Bethesda, Md. (Chen).
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Although both pediatric and adult patients with anxiety disorders exhibit similar neural responding to threats, age-related differences have been found in some functional MRI (fMRI) studies. To reconcile disparate findings, the authors compared brain function in youths and adults with and without anxiety disorders while rating fear and memory of ambiguous threats. METHODS: Two hundred medication-free individuals ages 8-50 were assessed, including 93 participants with an anxiety disorder. Participants underwent discriminative threat conditioning and extinction in the clinic. Approximately 3 weeks later, they completed an fMRI paradigm involving extinction recall, in which they rated their levels of fear evoked by, and their explicit memory for, morph stimuli with varying degrees of similarity to the extinguished threat cues. RESULTS: Age moderated two sets of anxiety disorder findings. First, as age increased, healthy subjects compared with participants with anxiety disorders exhibited greater amygdala-ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC) connectivity when processing threat-related cues. Second, age moderated diagnostic differences in activation in ways that varied with attention and brain regions. When rating fear, activation in the vmPFC differed between the anxiety and healthy groups at relatively older ages. In contrast, when rating memory for task stimuli, activation in the inferior temporal cortex differed between the anxiety and healthy groups at relatively younger ages. CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to previous studies that demonstrated age-related similarities in the biological correlates of anxiety disorders, this study identified age differences. These findings may reflect this study's focus on relatively late-maturing psychological processes, particularly the appraisal and explicit memory of ambiguous threat, and inform neurodevelopmental perspectives on anxiety.
OBJECTIVE: Although both pediatric and adult patients with anxiety disorders exhibit similar neural responding to threats, age-related differences have been found in some functional MRI (fMRI) studies. To reconcile disparate findings, the authors compared brain function in youths and adults with and without anxiety disorders while rating fear and memory of ambiguous threats. METHODS: Two hundred medication-free individuals ages 8-50 were assessed, including 93 participants with an anxiety disorder. Participants underwent discriminative threat conditioning and extinction in the clinic. Approximately 3 weeks later, they completed an fMRI paradigm involving extinction recall, in which they rated their levels of fear evoked by, and their explicit memory for, morph stimuli with varying degrees of similarity to the extinguished threat cues. RESULTS: Age moderated two sets of anxiety disorder findings. First, as age increased, healthy subjects compared with participants with anxiety disorders exhibited greater amygdala-ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC) connectivity when processing threat-related cues. Second, age moderated diagnostic differences in activation in ways that varied with attention and brain regions. When rating fear, activation in the vmPFC differed between the anxiety and healthy groups at relatively older ages. In contrast, when rating memory for task stimuli, activation in the inferior temporal cortex differed between the anxiety and healthy groups at relatively younger ages. CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to previous studies that demonstrated age-related similarities in the biological correlates of anxiety disorders, this study identified age differences. These findings may reflect this study's focus on relatively late-maturing psychological processes, particularly the appraisal and explicit memory of ambiguous threat, and inform neurodevelopmental perspectives on anxiety.
Authors: P K Reardon; Jakob Seidlitz; Simon Vandekar; Siyuan Liu; Raihaan Patel; Min Tae M Park; Aaron Alexander-Bloch; Liv S Clasen; Jonathan D Blumenthal; Francois M Lalonde; Jay N Giedd; Ruben C Gur; Raquel E Gur; Jason P Lerch; M Mallar Chakravarty; Theodore D Satterthwaite; Russell T Shinohara; Armin Raznahan Journal: Science Date: 2018-05-31 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Amanda E Guyer; Christopher S Monk; Erin B McClure-Tone; Eric E Nelson; Roxann Roberson-Nay; Abby D Adler; Stephen J Fromm; Ellen Leibenluft; Daniel S Pine; Monique Ernst Journal: J Cogn Neurosci Date: 2008-09 Impact factor: 3.225
Authors: Lauren K White; Jennifer C Britton; Stefanie Sequeira; Emily G Ronkin; Gang Chen; Yair Bar-Haim; Tomer Shechner; Monique Ernst; Nathan A Fox; Ellen Leibenluft; Daniel S Pine Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2016-04-27 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Dylan G Gee; Robert N Fetcho; Deqiang Jing; Anfei Li; Charles E Glatt; Andrew T Drysdale; Alexandra O Cohen; Danielle V Dellarco; Rui R Yang; Anders M Dale; Terry L Jernigan; Francis S Lee; B J Casey Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2016-03-21 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Alexandria Meyer; Greg Hajcak; Dana Torpey-Newman; Autumn Kujawa; Thomas M Olino; Margaret Dyson; Daniel N Klein Journal: Dev Psychobiol Date: 2018-01-18 Impact factor: 3.038
Authors: Christian K Tamnes; Megan M Herting; Anne-Lise Goddings; Rosa Meuwese; Sarah-Jayne Blakemore; Ronald E Dahl; Berna Güroğlu; Armin Raznahan; Elizabeth R Sowell; Eveline A Crone; Kathryn L Mills Journal: J Neurosci Date: 2017-02-27 Impact factor: 6.167
Authors: Rany Abend; Diana Burk; Sonia G Ruiz; Andrea L Gold; Julia L Napoli; Jennifer C Britton; Kalina J Michalska; Tomer Shechner; Anderson M Winkler; Ellen Leibenluft; Daniel S Pine; Bruno B Averbeck Journal: Elife Date: 2022-04-27 Impact factor: 8.713
Authors: Anita Harrewijn; Elizabeth R Kitt; Rany Abend; Chika Matsumoto; Paola Odriozola; Anderson M Winkler; Ellen Leibenluft; Daniel S Pine; Dylan G Gee Journal: Behav Brain Res Date: 2020-11-04 Impact factor: 3.332
Authors: Ashley R Smith; Simone P Haller; Sara A Haas; David Pagliaccio; Brigid Behrens; Caroline Swetlitz; Jessica L Bezek; Melissa A Brotman; Ellen Leibenluft; Nathan A Fox; Daniel S Pine Journal: Cogn Emot Date: 2020-09-21
Authors: Rany Abend; Mira A Bajaj; Anita Harrewijn; Chika Matsumoto; Kalina J Michalska; Elizabeth Necka; Esther E Palacios-Barrios; Ellen Leibenluft; Lauren Y Atlas; Daniel S Pine Journal: J Psychiatry Neurosci Date: 2021-03-11 Impact factor: 6.186