How an Eight-Membered Ring Alters the Rhodamine Chromophore.

Readily available phenylene-1,3-diamines can be converted into unprecedented analogues of rhodamine and malachite green possessing a central eight-membered ring in three steps. The overall process couples a cyanine chromophore with a urea bridge giving rise to new dyes possessing distinct spectral characteristics: absorption of orange light combined with a weak emission of red light both in solution and in the crystalline state. Their photophysics is governed by the twist of lateral phenyl rings and intramolecular and intermolecular CT transitions.

Introduction

The study of biological systems at the cellular and subcellular levels is greatly aided by small molecule fluorophores, of which members of the xanthene family, including fluorescein and rhodamine, have proved invaluable.[1] Recently, there has been an increased focus on harnessing the photophysical properties of these ubiquitous dyes through structural modifications. In particular, π-expansion[2−6] and replacement of the xanthene oxygen atom bridge with silicon,[7−9] phosphorus,[10] sulfur,[11] or carbon[12−14] in rhodamine,[15−18] fluorescein,[19,20] and rhodol[21] scaffolds have proved to be popular and effective.

The dyes from this extended family, despite their structural and functional diversity, share the quintessential characteristics: (a) planar aromatic structures; (b) excellent spectroscopic properties including strong absorption and fluorescence; (c) relatively small Stokes shifts; and (d) biocompatibility. At the same time, nonplanar chromophores, however, feature a number of peculiar properties, making it possible to overcome the limitations of conventional chromophores such as: (a) increased possibility for intramolecular charge transfer (ICT) and (b) their tendency to be more soluble, less aggregating, and be able to form amorphous thin films. The latter makes nonplanar chromophores good candidates for potential use in opto-electronic devices.[22,23]

The replacement of the oxygen bridge in xanthene chromophores with a two- or three-atom unit, which has not been reported to date, would enable us to create rigid but nonplanar chromophores. The concept of this project was to address the above general idea by constructing an analogue of rhodamine in which the bridging oxygen atom is formally replaced with a urea moiety to create an eight-membered ring. This can also be thought of as an analogue of malachite green (MG) in which the dialkylaminophenyl groups are tethered by urea. The inclusion of a ring of this size inside a chromophore is known to generate a distortion in planarity,[24] resulting in an overall twisted geometry because of the strained central fragment.[25−31] Through exploitation of this strategy, we demonstrate how this targeted introduction of structural diversity into well-known rhodamine chromophores can unlock solvent- and state-dependent photophysical properties.

Results and Discussion

Scheme details our proposed strategy to generate rhodamine analogues possessing a central urea-based eight-membered ring (8U-Rh) by taking advantage of the reactivity of electron-rich phenylene-1,3-diamines. In the first step, 1-dimethylamino-3-methylaminobenzene (1) smoothly reacts with 4-chlorobenzaldehyde in the presence of acetic acid as a catalyst to form a triarylmethane derivative 2a. Optimization of the subsequent cyclization step proved challenging because of the formation of a strained eight-membered ring system. Employment of phosgene solution led to a cyclized product 3a only in trace amounts as the high reactivity of phosgene results in low selectivity of this process. Indeed, mass spectrometry (MS) experiments suggest that the product of the addition to both secondary amino groups of a single triarylmethane forms even at −20 °C. The use of triphosgene, a less reactive analogue, enables a more selective initial reaction with a secondary amino group. According to MS data, experiments with different substrate/triphosgene ratios showed the formation of intermediates bearing triphosgene residues with different degrees of decomposition. The cyclization step is a much slower process and requires 3–18 days at room temperature in order to obtain the cyclic product 3a bearing an eight-membered ring in 53% yield. The oxidation of compound 3a with 2,3-dichloro-5,6-dicyanobenzoquinone (DDQ) leads to the formation of 8U-Rh 4a.

Scheme 1

Synthetic Route for Rhodamine Analogues 4a–e

To showcase our system’s synthetic utility, this strategy was applied utilizing other aldehydes (Scheme ). It was found that the efficacy of the cyclization reaction is dependent on both the steric hindrance (to a greater extent) and the electron-withdrawing properties of the aryl ring at the meso-position. Indeed, the reaction with 4-chlorobenzaldehyde was characterized by the shortest reaction time compared with that of 2-methylbenzaldehyde and mesitaldehyde; however, 2-trifluoromethylbenzaldehyde, which combined both these features, takes as long as 18 h to reach equilibrium. Further extension of the reaction time or variation of the temperature causes no improvement to the reaction yields. All in all, four additional 8U-Rhs 4b–e were prepared in overall yields ranging from 1 to 21%.

In order to analyze the distorted nature of the synthesized dyes, the structures of chromophores 4b and 4c were determined by X-ray crystallography (Figures S1 and S2).

In the crystal lattice, molecules 4b and 4c adopt a curved chromophore structure with unsymmetric geometry. The lateral benzene rings are positioned at different dihedral angles related to the central chromophore plane ranging from 27 to 43° for 4b and 29 to 32° for dye 4c. Moreover, the dihedral angle between lateral benzene rings reaches 68° for 4b and 60° for 4c, respectively (Figure S3). This angle controls the mutual orientation of the chromophore molecules in the crystal lattice resulting in the minimal distances of 4.480 Å for 4b and 3.591 Å for 4c, respectively (Figure S4), between π-systems of adjacent molecules.

The absorption spectra of the urea-bridged xanthenes 4a–e show intense maxima between 585 and 600 nm (Table , Figure ). The influence of the electronic character of the central aryl substituent is rather weak. The 8U-Rhs 4a and 4d possessing moderately electron-withdrawing 4-chloro- and 2-trifluoromethylphenyl substituents display somewhat red-shifted absorption maxima at 595 and 600 nm respectively, while urea-bridged rhodamines with electron-donating aryl moieties (4b,c) demonstrate absorption in the range 587–589 nm. The solvent polarity moderately affects the absorption properties of 8U-Rhs. The nonpolar dichloromethane (DCM) dyes 4a–e show more intense and more red-shifted absorption compared to acetonitrile and water solutions (Table ).

Table 1

Spectroscopic Properties of Urea-Bridged Rhodamines 4a–e in Solution

compd.	solvent	λabs/nm	εmax × 10–3/M–1 cm–1	λem/nm	ΔSa/cm–1	Φfl
4a	DCM	595	71	635	1060	0.00068
	H2O	584	41	c		0.00019
4b	DCM	589	71	635	1230	0.00044
	CH3CN	580	50	c		0.00014
	H2O	579	41	c		0.00010
	SOAb	586		637	1370	0.16
4c	DCM	587	68	637	1340	0.00148
	CH3CN	579	48	c		0.00035
	H2O	578	43	c		0.00017
	SOAb	583		638	1480	0.33
4d	DCM	600	58	656	1420	0.00058
	CH3CN	590	41	c		0.00019
	H2O	585	35	c		0.00009
4e	DCM	598	72	639	1070	0.00059
	CH3CN	590	52	c		0.00050
	H2O	590	39	c		0.00013
	SOAb	596		646	1300	0.17

Stokes shift.

Compounds 4a and 4d decomposed during the SOA experiment.

Fluorescence maxima were not determined because of the extremely low emission response.

Figure 1

Absorption (solid) and fluorescence (dotted) spectra of compounds 4b, 4c, and 4e in DCM.

The chromophore structure of 8U-Rhs resembles two known functional organic dyes, namely, rhodamine B (RB), possessing a rigid planar structure, and MG, which belongs to the triphenylmethane dye family. A comparison of spectral properties of 8U-Rhs 4a–e with RB[32] shows that insertion of the “urea bridge” into the xanthene chromophore gives rise to a 35 nm bathochromic shift of the absorption maximum, while for MG,[33,34] the absorption is blue-shifted by 20 nm.

The fluorescence maxima of 8U-Rhs 4a–e are typically around 635–640 nm, that is, they are ∼60 nm bathochromically shifted compared to RB. Regardless of the substitution pattern, 8U-Rhs 4a–e are very weakly emissive, reminiscent of the picosecond fluorescence of MG.[35] Non-negligible Stokes shifts (Table , Figure ) suggest certain geometrical differences between the molecules in their ground and excited states.

The hypothesis that the rotational motion of molecular fragments, in a similar manner to MG,[36−39] is the reason why 8U-Rhs show weak emission prompted us to study the dependence of fluorescence efficiency on the solution viscosity.[36] In methanol/glycerol mixtures, an increase in fluorescence efficiency was observed upon increasing the glycerol ratio (Figure , Table ).

Figure 2

Dependence of the fluorescence quantum yield on the solution viscosity for 8U-Rhs in the methanol/glycerol mixture.

Table 2

Fluorescence Quantum Yields of 8U-Rh Solutions under Different Viscosity Environments

		Φ/%
glycerol/MeOH volume ratio	η/cP	4a	4b	4c	4e
100:0	521.03	4.06	3.60	6.05	3.55
80:20	132.33	2.02	0.81	1.55	1.07
60:40	58.01	0.34	0.18	0.37	0.26
0:100	0.52	0.03	0.02	0.04	0.03

Likewise, stiffening of the environment by dissolution in highly viscous sucrose octaacetate (SOA)[40] limits the twisting of the 8U-Rhs’ structure in the excited state, which results in a significant increase in the fluorescence efficiency. In SOA solutions, compounds 4b, 4c, and 4e exhibit a 500–1000 fold increase in the fluorescence quantum yield with emission in a similar spectral region compared to traditional low viscous solvents (Figure , Table ). This experiment unambiguously proves that rotations within the chromophore are responsible for the weak fluorescence of the “urea-bridged” rhodamines in regular solvents. The fact that the electron-donating effect of the urea fragment is much weaker than that of nitrogen and comparable with the oxygen atom[41] reinforces a conclusion that the bent geometry rather than the presence of the nitrogen atom causes fluorescence quenching.

Figure 3

Absorption (solid) and fluorescence (dashed) spectra in SOA and fluorescence spectra in the polycrystalline state (dotted) for compounds 4b, 4c, and 4e.

Fluorescence spectra were also recorded for 8U-Rhs in the polycrystalline state. Low fluorescence responses with peak wavelengths at 715 nm for 4a (Φ = 0.22%), 740 nm for 4b (Φ = 0.04%), 728 nm for 4c (Φ = 0.15%), and 740 nm for 4e (Φ = 0.05%) were observed (Figure ). The weak quantum yields lead us to suspect the self-quenching effect in the crystalline solid states, which may be associated with the size of the crystals. In this study, however, we found that there is no obvious difference in quantum yields between the polycrystalline and ground powder, as shown in Table S12. In comparison to the emission in solution, a >90 nm bathochromic shift is observed for the polycrystalline state, indicating that there is a strong influence of crystal packing on the emission properties, which causes the red shift and significant quenching of fluorescence.

To rationalize the photophysical processes, density functional theory (DFT) and time-dependent (TD) DFT/B3LYP/6-31G(d,p) and CAM-B3LYP/6-31G(d,p) calculations were performed for the geometry optimization of 8U-Rh cations in the ground and excited states. Also, to evaluate the solvent effect, the polarizable continuum model was adopted. The Supporting Information file includes additional calculation details and an overview of the calculation results.

Based on the data presented in Supporting Information (optimized structures, shapes of the corresponding molecular orbitals, energies, and oscillator strengths of electronic transitions for 8U-Rhs, RB, and MG), it can be seen that the calculations reproduce the similarity of the structures in addition to the mutual location of experimental absorption spectra of 8U-Rhs, RB, and MG (Tables S1 and 3), as well as the weak dependence of these spectra on solvent polarity (Table S2).

Table 3

S0 → S1 and S1 → S0 Transition Data for 4a–4d Cations and Ion Pairs in CH3CN (TD B3LYP/6-31G(d,p))

	cations		ion pairs
	S0 → S1	S1 → S0	S0 → S1	S1 → S0
				(A)	(B)
4a	2.245 eV	0.954 eV	2.395 eV	0.3201 eV	1.466 eV
	552.18 nm	1300 nm	517.7 nm	3873 nm	845.6 nm
	f = 1.3751	f = 0.0003	f = 0.693	f = 0.000	f = 0.109
4b	2.276 eV	0.863 eV	2.2433 eV	0.894 eV	1.524 eV
	544.8 nm	1436 nm	552.7 nm	1386 nm	813.5 nm
	f = 1.300	f = 0.001	f = 1.1672	f = 0.001	f = 0.124
4c	2.285 eV	0.797 eV	2.459 eV	0.746 eV	1.577 eV
	542.50 nm	1556 nm	504.1 nm	1663 nm	786.4 nm
	f = 1.3452	f = 0.0015	f = 0.909	f = 0.001	f = 0.148
4d	2.241 eV	0.771 eV	2.372 eV	0.679 eV	1.440 eV
	553.15 nm	1608 nm	522.6 nm	1825 nm	861.1 nm
	f = 1.2159	f = 0.0020	f = 0.6892	f = 0.002	f = 0.091

However, the minimum energy of the excited 8U-Rhs, like in the case of MG[39] (but different from planar RB), corresponds to the structure with rotated lateral rings. This structure is characterized by low energy transitions to the ground state with extremely low oscillator strengths (Tables and S1). Such type of structure is created in the evolution of the system after electronic excitation, during which the rotation of phenyl rings is accompanied by intramolecular CT. A similar mechanism has been proposed for MG.[39] To gain further insights, we have extended our calculations to include R+Cl– ion pairs. The reason for this lies in that the calculation results of RB[42] show that the three orbitals of Cl– are energetically neighbor to the HOMO orbital located on R+. This also applies for the urea-bridged rhodamines in solvents of medium polarity (Figure S5). With such an energy arrangement of R+Cl– system orbitals, the appearance of intermolecular CT states (HOMO(Cl–) → LUMO(R+)) located near states localized on 8U-Rhs can be expected.

The simulation of absorption spectra of the ion pair R+Cl– of 4b (Table S3) illustrates that in low- and medium-polarity solvents, weak intensity CT transitions are present, but they are hidden under the large intensity band for the S0 → S1 transition localized on 8U-Rh+. This leads to subtle changes in the absorption spectrum, including peak broadening and a small shift of the main absorption band. Such effects disappear in polar solvents.

Optimization of the R+Cl– pair in the excited state showed that, in addition to the previously described structure with rotated lateral rings (A-case, similar to MG), a minimum of another type appears (B-case) (Table S4). This corresponds to a molecule with less twisted rings and is described by an intermolecular CT configuration because the HOMO orbital is predominately located on Cl– (Table S4). The energies and oscillator strengths of the S1 → S0 transition corresponding to the B-structure are greater in comparison to the A-structure (Table ). Comparing three optimized ion pair structures, it can be stated that the B-structure is characterized by the smallest distance between R+ and Cl– (Table S4, Figure ), allowing for more efficient mixing of electronic configurations. In other cases, that is, forms of S0 and A, the presence of Cl– in solution plays a smaller role, and their properties are described well enough by analyzing their cations.

Figure 4

Diagram of electronic states of 4b as an ion pair R+Cl– optimized by B3LYP and TD B3LYP/6-31G(d,p) methods in acetonitrile solution. Three structures are shown: S0 optimized in the ground state and both A and B optimized in the excited state.

However, it should be noted that with such complex systems as 8U-Rhs, full mapping of the potential energy surface in the excited state is a very difficult task. In Table S4, we indicate this problem by providing two sets of values for each of the optimized structures obtained using different starting points in space. It can be assumed that there are even more possible positions, and the experimental results are because of an average of the ensemble.

Figure presents a diagram of electronic states for compound 4b as a R+Cl– pair in acetonitrile solution (data in Table ).

Upon excitation, the 8U-Rhs can relax from the S1 state into a practically dark form A with a very low energy gap to the ground state (0.7–1.1 eV with B3LYP calculations and larger by about 0.4 eV with the CAM-B3LYP method) and with the oscillator strength value close to zero (Tables and S4). This is the pathway of nonradiative decay that has been analyzed in detail for MG.[37−39] In this form of excited state, the lateral ring planes of the 8U-Rhs are significantly twisted with respect to each other, which is possible because of the flexibility of the eight-membered ring.

Conclusions

In summary, we have designed and synthesized a series of rhodamine analogues bearing a central eight-membered ring. These new dyes adopt a curved geometry in the crystal lattice because of the highly strained central ring. In terms of electronic absorption behavior, 8U-Rhs resemble both rhodamines and triphenylmethane dyes. The 8U-Rhs exhibit strong absorption, which is red-shifted with respect to conventional rhodamine dyes and blue-shifted compared to MG that lacks a central electron-donating group and has free rotation for all phenyl groups. The presence of the central eight-membered ring in the 8U-Rhs causes quenching of fluorescence in all nonviscous solvents because of nonradiative deactivation pathways, in a similar manner to MG. Weak 8U-Rhs’ fluorescence can be attributed to the CT transition with small oscillator strength in the R+Cl– ion pair. In such a pair (contact in solution), there is a relatively short distance between Cl and R, and intermolecular CT interactions are factors that compete with the tendency to rotate the lateral rings. Although in this work this intermolecular CT mechanism is considered as a source of observed weak fluorescence, it can also be seen as a mechanism that quenches the fluorescence of the chromophore that is excited as a high-oscillator system. In this context, it can be thought that the concentration quenching of RB fluorescence,[43] which is discussed in terms of dimer formation, may also be associated with the formation of CT contact pairs.

Experimental Section

All chemicals were used as received unless otherwise noted. All reported 1H NMR spectra were collected using 500 and 600 MHz spectrometers. Chemical shifts (δ ppm) were determined with TMS as the internal reference; J values are given in Hz. Chromatography was performed on silica gel (230–400 mesh). The mass spectra were obtained by electron ionization (EI-MS) or electrospray ionization (ESI-MS). All photophysical studies were performed with freshly-prepared air-equilibrated solutions at room temperature (298 K).

A PerkinElmer Lambda 25 UV/Vis spectrophotometer and a Hitachi F7000 fluorescence spectrometer were used to acquire the absorption and emission spectra. Spectroscopic grade solvents were used without further purification. Fluorescence quantum yields were determined in CH2Cl2, acetonitrile, and water using sulforhodamine 101 in ethanol as the standard. The solid-state fluorescence measurements were conducted using a 405 nm diode laser coupled with a 540 nm longpass filter.

Preparation of SOA Solutions for Measurements

Concentrated dye solutions in dichloroethane are added to a homogeneous mixture of SOA and dichloroethane in a 9:1 ratio (small amount of dichloroethane makes the mixture less viscous). A homogenous dye solution is concentrated at reduced pressures and viscous foam-like dye solution in SOA was additionally dried in high-vacuum for several hours. The flask with the SOA solution was immersed in an oil bath (100–110 °C), and as soon as it became liquid it is rapidly transferred into the cuvette. To get rid of air bubbles, the cuvette was put into a round-bottom flask and the flask was immersed in the oil bath for several minutes. After cooling, the cuvette with the sample is ready for measurements.

Preparation of Ground Powder for Measurements

The samples were prepared either in a polycrystalline form or as ground powder. The quantum yields in the solid states were measured using an Edinburgh FLS980 fluorimeter equipped with an integrating sphere assembly F-M01.

General Procedure for the Preparation of Compounds 2

An ethanol solution (20 mL) of 6 mmol N,N,N-trimethyl-m-phenylenediamine 1 (or N-methyl-3-(pyrrolidin-1-yl)aniline 5) and an aromatic aldehyde (3 mmol) containing two drops of acetic acid was stirred for 48 h at r.t. The product was filtered off, washed with ethanol, and dried in vacuo to give a pure product.

4,4′-((4-Chlorophenyl)methylene)bis(N1,N1,N3-trimethylbenzene-1,3-diamine) 2a

Off-white crystalline solid. Yield 78% (0.99 g). 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 7.25 (d, 2H, J = 8.5 Hz), 6.94 (d, 2H, J = 8.4 Hz), 6.25 (d, 2H, J = 8.3 Hz), 5.86–5.89 (m, 4H), 5.22 (s, 1H), 4.39 (q, 2H, J = 4.8 Hz), 2.80 (s, 12H), 2.61 (d, 6H, J = 5.0 Hz); 13C NMR (126 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 150.7, 147.7, 143.4, 131.4, 130.7, 129.6, 128.2, 116.3, 101.2, 95.5, 42.9, 40.7, 30.8; HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z: [M + H]+ calcd for C25H32N4Cl, 423.2315; found, 423.2299.

4,4′-((2-Methylphenyl)methylene)bis(N1,N1,N3-trimethylbenzene-1,3-diamine) 2b

Off-white crystalline solid. Yield 79% (0.95 g). It is not possible to get clean NMR spectra, though both MS spectral and elemental analyses suggest product 2b.

Elemental analysis: calcd for C26H34N4: C, (77.57%); H, (8.51%); N, (13.92%). Found: C, (77.60%); H, (8.47%); N, (13.81%); HRMS (EI-magnetic sector) m/z: [M]+• calcd for C26H34N4, 402.2783; found, 402.2787.

4,4′-((2,4,6-Trimethylphenyl)methylene)bis(N1,N1,N3-trimethylbenzene-1,3-diamine) 2c

Off-white crystalline solid. Yield 44% (0.56 g). 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 6.77 (s, 2H), 6.33 (d, 2H, J = 9.0 Hz), 5.92–5.94 (m, 4H), 5.16 (s, 1H), 3.67 (s, 2H), 2.85 (s, 12H), 2.63 (d, 6H, J = 5.0 Hz), 2.20 (s, 3H), 18.7 (s, 6H); 13C NMR (126 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 150.7, 148.2, 137.4, 135.9, 135.2, 130.6, 129.4, 114.6, 101.6, 95.3, 41.8, 40.7, 31.0, 21.7, 20.8; HRMS (EI-magnetic sector) m/z: [M]+• calcd for C28H38N4, 430.3096; found, 430.3094.

4,4′-((2-(Trifluoromethyl)phenyl)methylene)bis(N1,N1,N3-trimethylbenzene-1,3-diamine) 2d

Off-white crystalline solid. Yield 63% (0.86 g). 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 7.69 (d, 1H, J = 7.6 Hz), 7.53 (t, 1H, J = 7.7 Hz), 7.42 (t, 1H, J = 7.6 Hz), 7.01 (d, 1H, J = 7.8 Hz), 6.20 (d, 2H, J = 8.8 Hz), 5.90–5.91 (m, 4H), 5.39 (s, 1H), 4.09 (q, 2H, J = 4.8 Hz), 2.84 (s, 12H), 2.62 (d, 6H, J = 5.0 Hz); 13C NMR (126 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 150.7, 147.5, 142.7, 132.3, 131.4, 129.4, 127.2, 115.8, 101.1, 95.7, 40.6, 30.9; 19F NMR (470 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ −58.18; HRMS (EI-magnetic sector) m/z: [M]+• calcd for C26H31F3N4, 456.2501; found, 456.2508.

6,6′-((2-Methylphenyl)methylene)bis(N-methyl-3-(pyrrolidin-1-yl)aniline) 2e

Off-white crystalline solid. Yield 80% (1.09 g). 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 7.03–7.09 (m, 2H), 7.00 (t, 1H, J = 6.8 Hz), 6.64 (d, 1H, J = 7.7 Hz), 6.21 (d, 2H, J = 8.1 Hz), 5.70–5.74 (m, 4H), 5.13 (s, 1H), 4.19 (q, 2H, J = 4.3 Hz), 3.16–3.18 (m, 8H), 2.63 (d, 6H, J = 5.0 Hz), 2.05 (s, 3H), 1.89–1.91 (m, 8H); 13C NMR (126 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 147.9, 147.8, 142.8, 137.3, 130.5, 129.6, 128.2, 126.2, 125.6, 114.9, 100.4, 94.6, 47.7, 30.9, 25.4, 19.5; HRMS (EI-magnetic sector) m/z: [M]+• calcd for C30H38N4, 454.3096; found, 454.3104.

N-Methyl-3-(pyrrolidin-1-yl)aniline 5(44)

A mixture containing 4.07 g (0.018 mol) of 1-(3-bromophenyl)pyrrolidine, 22.7 mL of 41% (0.27 mol) methylamine water solution, and 0.057 g (0.65 mmol) of copper powder was heated at 100 °C in a pressure flask for 6 days with stirring. Upon cooling, the reactant was filtered through the cotton pad and the product was extracted with ethyl acetate. The organic layer was dried over MgSO4. The inorganic material was filtered off and the filtrate was evaporated. The product was purified by distillation at 100–103 °C under reduced pressure (0.15 mbar), and the pure product crystallized as an off-white solid. Yield 2.00 g (63%). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.05 (t, 1H, J = 8.0 Hz), 5.99–6.01 (m, 2H), 5.83 (t, 1H, J = 2.1 Hz), 3.63 (br s, 1H), 3.26–3.28 (m, 4H), 2.83 (s, 3H), 1.96–1.98 (m, 4H); 13C NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3): δ 150.4, 149.1, 129.8, 101.9, 100.9, 95.8, 47.6, 30.9, 25.4; HRMS (EI-magnetic sector) m/z: [M]+• calcd for C11H16N2, 176.1313; found, 176.1317.

General Procedure for the Preparation of Compounds 3

A solution of compound 2 (2 mmol) and diisopropylethylamine (6 mmol) in dry CH2Cl2 (20 mL) was cooled to −5 °C under an argon atmosphere. Triphosgene (1 mmol) was added to the stirred solution in one portion. The solution was stirred for 30 min at 0 °C. The solution was stirred at r.t. for an additional period of time individually for each product. On reaction completion, the solution was diluted with 100 mL of CH2Cl2 and washed with water. The organic layer was dried over MgSO4. Upon evaporation, the residue was purified by column chromatography (SiO2, toluene/ethyl acetate 1:1). After evaporation of the product fraction, the product was dried at 140 °C for 1 h.

12-(4-Chlorophenyl)-3,9-bis(dimethylamino)-5,7-dimethyl-7,12-dihydrodibenzo[d,g][1,3]diazocin-6(5H)-one 3a

Reaction time: 3 days. Column chromatography (SiO2, toluene/ethyl acetate 1:1). Off-white crystalline solid. Yield 53% (0.48 g). 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 7.21 (d, 2H, J = 8.5 Hz), 7.11 (d, 2H, J = 8.5 Hz), 6.67 (d, 2H, J = 8.3 Hz), 6.52 (dd, 2H, J = 8.4 Hz, J = 2.5 Hz), 6.44 (d, 2H, J = 2.5 Hz), 5.34 (s, 1H), 2.88 (s, 12H), 2.38 (s, 6H); 13C NMR (126 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 162.5, 153.5, 147.4, 135.5, 132.9, 131.9, 130.5, 124.4, 111.9, 108.7, 56.3, 43.2, 39.0; HRMS (EI-magnetic sector) m/z: [M]+• calcd for C26H29N4OCl, 448.2030; found, 448.2021.

3,9-Bis(dimethylamino)-12-(4-methylphenyl)-5,7-dimethyl-7,12-dihydrodibenzo[d,g][1,3]diazocin-6(5H)-one 3b

Reaction time: 4 days. Column chromatography (SiO2, toluene/ethyl acetate 1:1). Off-white crystalline solid. Yield 30% (0.26 g). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.15 (d, 2H, J = 8.4 Hz), 7.09 (t, 1H, J = 7.4 Hz), 6.97–7.03 (m, 2H), 6.70 (d, 1H, J = 7.5 Hz), 6.54 (d, 2H, J = 9.3 Hz), 6.40 (s, 2H), 5.32 (s, 1H), 2.94 (s, 12H), 2.48 (s, 6H), 1.98 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3): δ 160.2, 150.3, 144.6, 142.5, 135.5, 132.8, 130.2, 129.3, 125.79, 125.76, 122.4, 109.5, 105.5, 54.5, 40.6, 36.0, 20.8; HRMS (EI-magnetic sector) m/z: [M]+• calcd for C27H32N4O, 428.2576; found, 428.2567.

3,9-Bis(dimethylamino)-12-(2,4,6-trimethylphenyl)-5,7-dimethyl-7,12-dihydrodibenzo[d,g][1,3]diazocin-6(5H)-one 3c

Reaction time: 14 days. Column chromatography (SiO2, toluene/ethyl acetate 1:1). Off-white crystalline solid. Yield 57% (0.52 g). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 6.88 (s, 2H), 6.74 (d, 2H, J = 8.8 Hz), 6.53 (s, 2H), 6.39 (d, 2H, J = 9.7 Hz), 5.85 (s, 1H), 3.05 (s, 3H), 2.90 (s, 12H), 2.30 (s, 3H), 2.04 (s, 6H); 13C NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3): δ 163.4, 149.3, 145.5, 138.7, 137.4, 135.4, 130.9, 129.9, 124.0, 109.9, 106.2, 43.9, 40.5, 36.5, 22.1, 20.8; HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z: [M + H]+ calcd for C29H36N4O, 457.2967; found, 457.2967.

3,9-Bis(dimethylamino)-12-(2-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl)-5,7-dimethyl-7,12-dihydrodibenzo[d,g][1,3]diazocin-6(5H)-one 3d

Reaction time: 18 days. Column chromatography (SiO2, toluene/ethyl acetate 1:1). Off-white crystalline solid. Yield 30% (0.29 g). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.58 (d, 1H, J = 8.4 Hz), 7.43 (t, 1H, J = 8.2 Hz), 7.24 (t, 1H, J = 7.4 Hz), 7.11 (d, 2H, J = 9.1 Hz), 6.99 (d, 1H, J = 7.9 Hz), 6.52 (d, 2H, J = 6.7 Hz), 2.94 (s, 12H), 2.51 (s, 6 H); 13C NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3): δ 160.2, 150.5, 144.6, 132.6, 132.7, 131.9, 131.5, 126.5, 126.4, 125.9, 109.4, 105.3, 52.4, 40.6, 36.1; 19F NMR (470 MHz, CDCl3): δ −58.77; HRMS (EI-magnetic sector) m/z: [M]+• calcd for C27H29F3N4O, 482.2293; found, 482.2288.

5,7-Dimethyl-3,9-di(pyrrolidin-1-yl)-12-(2-methylphenyl)-7,12-dihydrodibenzo[d,g][1,3]diazocin-6(5H)-one 3e

Reaction time: 11 days. Column chromatography (SiO2, toluene/ethyl acetate 1:1). Off-white crystalline solid. Yield 56% (0.54 g). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.41 (d, 1H, J = 7.9 Hz), 7.30 (d, 2H, J = 8.3 Hz), 7.24 (t, 1H, J = 7.3 Hz), 7.03–7.10 (m, 2H), 6.45 (dd, 2H, J = 8.3 Hz, J = 2.3 Hz), 6.40 (d, 2H, J = 2.0 Hz), 5.63 (s, 1H), 2.99–3.02 (m, 8H), 2.77 (s, 6H), 2.19 (s, 3H), 1.59–1.61 (m, 8H); 13C NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3): δ 160.0, 147.7, 145.3, 143.4, 133.0, 130.1, 130.0, 127.9, 127.7, 127.6, 126.0, 125.7, 108.6, 104.6, 55.3, 47.2, 35.9, 25.1, 20.7; HRMS (EI-magnetic sector) m/z: [M]+• calcd for C31H36N4O, 480.2889; found, 480.2894.

General Procedure for Oxidation of Compounds 3 to Rhodamine Analogues 4

In a 50 mL round bottom flask, 1 mmol cyclic compound 3a–e and 1.1 mmol DDQ were dissolved in 12 mL of dry DCM. The resulting solution was stirred for 30 min at room temperature under an argon atmosphere. The reaction mixture was then evaporated and the residue was purified by column chromatography (silica) using a solvent system of 9:1 CH2Cl2/MeOH with the addition of 1.2 g of Aliquat 336 (trioctylmethylammonium chloride) for each 100 mL of eluent. After evaporation of the solvents, hexane was added to the mixture. The product was filtered off, washed with fresh hexane, and dried at 80 °C for 4 h (4d at 40 °C). In some cases, when the crystalline product was contaminated with the residue of Aliquat 336, the product was dissolved with a small amount of DCM and crystallized by the addition of diethyl ether and a few drops of methanol to give a pure reaction product.

(Z)-N-(12-(4-Chlorophenyl)-9-(dimethylamino)-5,7-dimethyl-6-oxo-6,7-dihydrodibenzo[d,g][1,3]diazocin-3(5H)-ylidene)-N-methylmethanaminium Chloride 4a

Dark glossy crystalline solid. Column chromatography (SiO2) was performed using a solvent system of 9:1 CH2Cl2/MeOH with the addition of 1.2 g of Aliquat 336. Yield 70% (0.34 g). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.47 (d, 2H, J = 8.4 Hz), 7.05 (d, 2H, J = 8.4 Hz), 6.87 (d, 2H, J = 9.6 Hz), 6.73 (dd, 2H, J = 9.6 Hz, J = 2.5 Hz), 6.51 (d, 2H, J = 2.5 Hz), 3.38 (s, 12H), 3.22 (s, 6H); 13C NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3): δ 162.2, 161.0, 157.1, 153.4, 141.1, 139.4, 137.6, 134.3, 128.6, 125.0, 112.5, 103.1, 41.4, 37.3; HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z: [M]+ calcd for C26H28N4OCl+, 447.1952; found, 447.1970.

(Z)-N-(9-(Dimethylamino)-5,7-dimethyl-6-oxo-12-(2-methylphenyl)-6,7-dihydrodibenzo[d,g][1,3]diazocin-3(5H)-ylidene)-N-methylmethanaminium Chloride 4b

Dark glossy crystalline solid. Column chromatography (SiO2) was performed using a solvent system of 9:1 CH2Cl2/MeOH with the addition of 1.2 g of Aliquat 336. Yield 65% (0.30 g). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.44 (t, 1H, J = 8.0 Hz), 7.32 (d, 1H, 7.5 Hz), 7.29 (d, 1H, J = 7.5 Hz), 6.90–6.93 (m, 2H), 6.78 (d, 1H, J = 9.4 Hz), 6.74 (dd, 1H, J = 9.7 Hz, J = 2.4 Hz), 6.61 (dd, 1H, J = 9.5 Hz, J = 2.5 Hz), 6.53 (dd, 2H, J = 16.1 Hz, J = 2.4 Hz), 3.45 (s, 6H), 3.30 (s, 6H), 3.27 (s, 3H), 3.21 (s, 3H), 1.87 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3): δ 164.0, 160.9, 158.3, 155.8, 155.2, 151.1, 142.0, 140.2, 137.7, 137.0, 131.8, 130.9, 130.3, 125.7, 125.7, 124.4, 112.8, 112.1, 103.7, 102.6, 41.7, 40.9, 37.27, 37.25, 19.7; HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z: [M]+ calcd for C27H31N4O+, 427.2498; found, 427.2499.

(Z)-N-(9-(Dimethylamino)-5,7-dimethyl-6-oxo-12-(2,4,6-trimethylphenyl)-6,7-dihydrodibenzo[d,g][1,3]diazocin-3(5H)-ylidene)-N-methylmethanaminium Chloride 4c

Dark glossy crystalline solid. Column chromatography (SiO2) was performed using a solvent system of 9:1 CH2Cl2/MeOH with the addition of 1.2 g of Aliquat 336. Yield 85% (0.42 g). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 6.92 (s, 2H), 6.85 (d, 2H, J = 9.6 Hz), 6.65 (dd, 2H, J = 9.6 Hz, J = 2.5 Hz), 6.48 (d, 2H, J = 2.5 Hz), 5.28 (s, 1H), 3.35 (s, 12H), 3.19 (s, 6H), 2.33 (s, 3H), 1.76 (s, 6H); 13C NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3): δ 167.0, 163.8, 159.7, 155.8, 142.5, 141.7, 141.0, 138.7, 131.7, 127.5, 115.4, 105.9, 43.9, 40.0, 23.8, 22.5; HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z: [M]+ calcd for C29H35N4O+, 455.2811; found, 455.2807.

(Z)-N-(9-(Dimethylamino)-5,7-dimethyl-6-oxo-12-(2-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl)-6,7-dihydrodibenzo[d,g][1,3]diazocin-3(5H)-ylidene)-N-methylmethanaminium Chloride 4d

Dark glossy crystalline solid. Column chromatography (SiO2) was performed using a solvent system of 9:1 CH2Cl2/MeOH with the addition of 1.2 g of Aliquat 336. Yield 5% (26 mg). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.77–7.78 (m, 2H), 7.67 (t, 1H, J = 7.8 Hz), 7.25 (d, 1H, J = 5.5 Hz), 6.89 (d, 1H, J = 10.0 Hz), 6.78 (dd, 1H, J = 10.0 Hz, J = 2.2 Hz), 6.58–6.60 (m, 1H), 6.50 (m, 2H), 6.45 (d, 1H, J = 2.0 Hz), 3.56 (s, 6H), 3.29 (s, 3H), 3.18 (s, 3H), 3.17 (s, 6H); 13C NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3): δ 160.1, 159.6, 159.2, 157.8, 154.3, 148.5, 148.5, 140.6, 139.9, 136.3, 134.0, 132.1, 130.1, 127.0, 126.9, 122.9, 114.2, 111.1, 105.0, 101.3, 42.4, 40.4, 37.1; 19F NMR (470 MHz, CDCl3): δ −58.31; HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z: [M]+ calcd for C27H28F3N4O+, 481.2202; found, 481.2213.

(Z)-1-(5,7-Dimethyl-6-oxo-9-(pyrrolidin-1-yl)-12-(2-methylphenyl)-6,7-dihydrodibenzo[d,g][1,3]diazocin-3(5H)-ylidene)pyrrolidin-1-ium Chloride 4e

The reaction did not reach a full conversion in 2.5 h. Column chromatography (SiO2) was performed using a solvent system of 9:1 CH2Cl2/MeOH with the addition of 1.2 g of Aliquat 336. After purification, the product was contaminated with Aliquat 336. The product was recrystallized from the mixture of CH2Cl2 and diethyl ether as a dark glossy crystalline solid. Yield 14% (0.07 g). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.43 (t, 1H, J = 7.3 Hz), 7.28–7.32 (m, 2H), 6.89–6.94 (m, 2H), 6.77 (d, 1H, J = 9.3 Hz), 6.61 (d, 1H, J = 7.9 Hz), 6.49 (d, 1H, J = 9.4 Hz), 6.42 (s, 2H), 3.57–3.80 (br s, 8H), 3.26 (s, 3H), 3.21 (s, 3H), 2.15–2.18 (m, 8H), 1.88 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3): δ 163.8, 161.2, 155.6, 155.1, 153.2, 151.0, 142.2, 140.2, 137.8, 137.0, 131.9, 130.8, 130.2, 125.8, 125.7, 124.5, 113.6, 112.7, 104.2, 103.4, 49.8, 48.9, 37.2, 25.3, 25.2, 19.7; HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z: [M]+ calcd for C31H35N4O+, 479.2811; found, 479.2815.

Preparation of Single Crystals

Monocrystalline samples were obtained by the vapor diffusion method using acetonitrile (solvent) and diethyl ether (precipitant) for compound 4b and acetonitrile (solvent) and THF (precipitant) for 4c.