Literature DB >> 32251739

Combination of conservative treatment and temporary bilateral laparoscopic uterine artery clipping with hysteroscopic transcervical resection for cervical pregnancy: A retrospective study.

Kazuaki Imai1, Yoshiyuki Fukushi2, Mai Nishimura3, Yasuhiro Ohara4, Yukio Suzuki5, Hajime Ota6, Ayako Nakajima7, Shinichiro Wada8, Takafumi Fujino9.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: We investigated whether temporary bilateral laparoscopic uterine artery clipping with hysteroscopic transcervical resection (LUA clipping-TCR) is an effective minimally invasive treatment for the management of cervical pregnancy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study is a retrospective clinical case series conducted at Teine Keijinkai Hospital from January 2014 to June 2019. Nine cervical pregnancies among 164 ectopic pregnancies were retrospectively examined. The intervention involved performing LUA clipping-TCR on villous tissue. Information on patient characteristics, clinical data, and surgical details was collected from medical records and surgical videos.
RESULTS: The mean (range) age of the patients was 33 years (29-41 years); and mean gestational sac diameter, 12.8 mm (5-24 mm). Five patients had a history of intrauterine procedures. Three patients had a positive fetal heartbeat. The mean (range) preoperative serum hCG level (mIU/mL), surgical time (min), uterine artery blocking time (min), and amount of surgical blood loss (ml) were 14,040 (2880-41,367), 82 (62-120), 42 (21-68), and 57 (10-200), respectively. The mean decrease in serum hCG level (second postoperative day) and duration until resumption of menstruation were 79.7 % (70-86.7 %) and 46 days (35-80 days), respectively. The hospitalization period was 2-3 days, with no evidence of persistent ectopic pregnancy. Live birth was achieved in four cases. DISCUSSION: Our results confirm previous findings and provide new evidence that LUA clipping-TCR is effective for cervical pregnancy management and fertility preservation, respectively. Future large-scale prospective studies to compare different cervical pregnancy management methods are required.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ectopic pregnancy; Hysteroscopy; Laparoscopy; Surgical management; Uterine artery clipping

Year:  2020        PMID: 32251739     DOI: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2020.101735

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod        ISSN: 2468-7847


  2 in total

1.  Effectiveness and safety of ultrasound-guided intramuscular lauromacrogol injection combined with hysteroscopy in cervical pregnancy treatment: A case report.

Authors:  Jian-Pei Ye; Yang Gao; Li-Wei Lu; Yong-Ju Ye
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2022-06-26       Impact factor: 1.534

2.  Management of Cervical Ectopic Pregnancy with Small-Caliber Hysteroscopy.

Authors:  Rastko Maglic; Aleksandar Rakic; Branka Nikolic; Dragana Maglic; Predrag Jokanovic; Sladjana Mihajlovic
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2021 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.172

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.