Catherine M McHugh1, Matthew M Large2. 1. Brain and Mind Centre, University of Sydney. 2. School of Psychiatry, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: In recent years there has been interest in the use of machine learning in suicide research in reaction to the failure of traditional statistical methods to produce clinically useful models of future suicide. The current review summarizes recent prediction studies in the suicide literature including those using machine learning approaches to understand what value these novel approaches add. RECENT FINDINGS: Studies using machine learning to predict suicide deaths report area under the curve that are only modestly greater than, and sensitivities that are equal to, those reported in studies using more conventional predictive methods. Positive predictive value remains around 1% among the cohort studies with a base rate that was not inflated by case-control methodology. SUMMARY: Machine learning or artificial intelligence may afford opportunities in mental health research and in the clinical care of suicidal patients. However, application of such techniques should be carefully considered to avoid repeating the mistakes of existing methodologies. Prediction studies using machine-learning methods have yet to make a major contribution to our understanding of the field and are unproven as clinically useful tools.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: In recent years there has been interest in the use of machine learning in suicide research in reaction to the failure of traditional statistical methods to produce clinically useful models of future suicide. The current review summarizes recent prediction studies in the suicide literature including those using machine learning approaches to understand what value these novel approaches add. RECENT FINDINGS: Studies using machine learning to predict suicide deaths report area under the curve that are only modestly greater than, and sensitivities that are equal to, those reported in studies using more conventional predictive methods. Positive predictive value remains around 1% among the cohort studies with a base rate that was not inflated by case-control methodology. SUMMARY: Machine learning or artificial intelligence may afford opportunities in mental health research and in the clinical care of suicidal patients. However, application of such techniques should be carefully considered to avoid repeating the mistakes of existing methodologies. Prediction studies using machine-learning methods have yet to make a major contribution to our understanding of the field and are unproven as clinically useful tools.
Authors: Carl B Roth; Andreas Papassotiropoulos; Annette B Brühl; Undine E Lang; Christian G Huber Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-08-05 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Robert M Bossarte; Chris J Kennedy; Alex Luedtke; Matthew K Nock; Jordan W Smoller; Cara Stokes; Ronald C Kessler Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2021-12-01 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Catherine McHugh; Yun Ju Christine Song; Natalia Zmicerevska; Jacob Crouse; Alissa Nichles; Chloe Wilson; Nicholas Ho; Frank Iorfino; Adam Skinner; Elizabeth M Scott; Ian B Hickie Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2022-02-21 Impact factor: 2.692