Literature DB >> 32250646

Nasal Bone Fractures: Analysis of 1193 Cases with an Emphasis on Coincident Adjacent Fractures.

Lifeng Li1, Hongrui Zang1, Demin Han1, Bentao Yang2, Shaun C Desai3, Nyall R London3,4.   

Abstract

Importance: The nasal bone is one of the most commonly fractured bones of the midface. However, the frequency of coincident fractures of adjacent bones such as the frontal process of the maxillary bone, nasal septum, and medial or inferior orbital walls has not been fully evaluated. Objective: The purpose of this study was to investigate the incidence of fractures of adjacent structures in the setting of a nasal bone fracture. Second, we propose a new classification system of nasal bone fractures with involvement of adjacent bony structures. Design, Setting, and Participants: One thousand, one hundred ninety-three patients with midfacial fractures were retrospectively reviewed. The characteristics of fractures of the nasal bone and the incidence of coincident fractures of the frontal process of maxilla, bony nasal septum, medial, or inferior orbital walls were analyzed. Exposure: All patients included in the study presented with nasal trauma. Main Outcomes and Measures: The coincident fractures of adjacent midfacial structures were assessed, and a new classification of midfacial fractures based on computed tomography (CT) scan images was proposed.
Results: Among the 1193 cases, bilateral fractures of the nasal bone were most common (69.24%), and coexistent fracture of the frontal process of the maxilla and bony nasal septum was 66.89% and 42.25%, respectively. Coincident fracture of the orbital walls was observed in 16.51% of cases. The major etiology of fracture for the younger and elderly groups was falls, compared with assault as the most common etiology in the adult group. A classification scheme was generated in which fractures of the nasal bone were divided into five types depending on coexisting fractures of adjacent structures. Conclusions and Relevance: External force applied to the nasal bone can also lead to coexistent fracture of adjacent bony structures including the frontal process of the maxilla, nasal septum, and orbital walls. The proposed classification of nasal fracture based on CT imaging helps to incorporate coincident disruption of adjacent structures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32250646      PMCID: PMC7476382          DOI: 10.1089/fpsam.2020.0026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med        ISSN: 2689-3614


  25 in total

1.  Analysis of radiographically confirmed blunt-mechanism facial fractures.

Authors:  Gerhard S Mundinger; Amir H Dorafshar; Marta M Gilson; Suhail K Mithani; Joseph A Kelamis; Michael R Christy; Paul N Manson; Eduardo D Rodriguez
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 1.046

2.  Study of maxillofacial trauma, its aetiology, distribution, specturm, and management.

Authors:  Darashingh Rajput; L M Bariar
Journal:  J Indian Med Assoc       Date:  2013-01

3.  Evaluation and reduction of nasal trauma.

Authors:  Brian P Kelley; Cara R Downey; Samuel Stal
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 2.314

4.  Nasoethmoid orbital fractures: diagnosis and management.

Authors:  L A Sargent; G F Rogers
Journal:  J Craniomaxillofac Trauma       Date:  1999

Review 5.  Pediatric nasal injuries and management.

Authors:  Richard J Wright; Craig S Murakami; Bryan T Ambro
Journal:  Facial Plast Surg       Date:  2011-10-25       Impact factor: 1.446

6.  Outcomes in pediatric facial fractures: early follow-up in 177 children and classification scheme.

Authors:  S Alex Rottgers; Gary Decesare; Mimi Chao; Darren M Smith; James J Cray; Sanjay Naran; Lisa Vecchione; Lorelei Grunwaldt; Joseph E Losee
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 1.046

7.  Clinical indicators of midface fracture in patients with trauma.

Authors:  Hayden L Smith; Elizabeth Chrischilles; Todd J Janus; Richard A Sidwell; Marizen Ramirez; Corinne Peek-Asa; Sheryl M Sahr
Journal:  Dent Traumatol       Date:  2012-10-16       Impact factor: 3.333

8.  An assessment of maxillofacial fractures: a 5-year study of 237 patients.

Authors:  Mohammad Hosein Kalantar Motamedi
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 1.895

9.  Defining predictable patterns of craniomaxillofacial injury in the elderly: analysis of 1,047 patients.

Authors:  Jonathan A Zelken; Saami Khalifian; Gerhard S Mundinger; Jinny S Ha; Paul N Manson; Eduardo D Rodriguez; Amir H Dorafshar
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2013-10-16       Impact factor: 1.895

10.  Six years of facial trauma care: an epidemiological analysis of 355 cases.

Authors:  Thiago Bittencourt Ottoni Carvalho; Launa Renata Londero Cancian; Caroline Gabriele Marques; Vânia Belintani Piatto; José Victor Maniglia; Fernando Drimel Molina
Journal:  Braz J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2010 Sep-Oct
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.