Literature DB >> 32250503

Cardiovascular Outcomes in Relation to Antihypertensive Medication Use in Women with and Without Cancer: Results from the Women's Health Initiative.

Kerryn W Reding1,2, Aaron K Aragaki2, Richard K Cheng3, Ana Barac4, Sylvia Wassertheil-Smoller5, Jessica Chubak6, Marian C Limacher7, W Gregory Hundley8,9, Ralph D'Agostino9, Mara Z Vitolins9, Theodore M Brasky10, Laurel A Habel11, Eric J Chow2,3, Rebecca D Jackson12, Chu Chen2, April Morgenroth13, Wendy E Barrington1,2, Matthew Banegas14, Matthew Barnhart15, Rowan T Chlebowski16.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Recent clinical trials have evaluated angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors (ACEis), angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), and beta blockers (BBs) in relation to cardiotoxicity in patients with cancer, typically defined by ejection fraction declines. However, these trials have not examined long-term, hard clinical endpoints. Within a prospective study, we examined the risk of heart failure (HF) and coronary heart disease (CHD) events in relation to use of commonly used antihypertensive medications, including ACEis/ARBs, BBs, calcium channel blockers (CCB), and diuretics, comparing women with and without cancer.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a cohort of 56,997 Women's Health Initiative study participants free of cardiovascular disease who received antihypertensive treatment, we used multivariable-adjusted Cox regression models to calculate the hazard ratios (HRs) of developing CHD, HF, and a composite outcome of cardiac events (combining CHD and HF) in relation to use of ACEis/ARBs, CCBs, or diuretics versus BBs, separately in women with and without cancer.
RESULTS: Whereas there was no difference in risk of cardiac events comparing ACEi/ARB with BB use among cancer-free women (HR = 0.99 [0.88-1.12]), among cancer survivors ACEi/ARB users were at a 2.24-fold risk of total cardiac events (1.18-4.24); p-interaction = .06). When investigated in relation to CHD only, an increased risk was similarly observed in ACEi/ARB versus BB use for cancer survivors (HR = 1.87 [0.88-3.95]) but not in cancer-free women (HR = 0.91 [0.79-1.06]; p-interaction = .04). A similar pattern was also seen in relation to HF but did not reach statistical significance (p-interaction = .23).
CONCLUSION: These results from this observational study suggest differing risks of cardiac events in relation to antihypertensive medications depending on history of cancer. Although these results require replication before becoming actionable in a clinical setting, they suggest the need for more rigorous examination of the effect of antihypertensive choice on long-term cardiac outcomes in cancer survivors. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Although additional research is needed to replicate these findings, these data from a large, nationally representative sample of postmenopausal women indicate that beta blockers are favorable to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors in reducing the risk of cardiac events among cancer survivors. This differs from the patterns observed in a noncancer cohort, which largely mirrors what is found in the randomized clinical trials in the general population. © AlphaMed Press 2020.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Antihypertensive medications; Cancer survivors; Cardiovascular disease; Coronary heart disease; Heart failure

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32250503      PMCID: PMC7418354          DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2019-0977

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncologist        ISSN: 1083-7159


  44 in total

1.  Cardiovascular protection and blood pressure reduction: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  J A Staessen; J G Wang; L Thijs
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2001-10-20       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Implementation of the Women's Health Initiative study design.

Authors:  Garnet L Anderson; Joann Manson; Robert Wallace; Bernedine Lund; Dallas Hall; Scott Davis; Sally Shumaker; Ching-Yun Wang; Evan Stein; Ross L Prentice
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 3.797

Review 3.  Should beta blockers remain first choice in the treatment of primary hypertension? A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Lars Hjalmar Lindholm; Bo Carlberg; Ola Samuelsson
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2005 Oct 29-Nov 4       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Comparison of the Framingham and Reynolds Risk scores for global cardiovascular risk prediction in the multiethnic Women's Health Initiative.

Authors:  Nancy R Cook; Nina P Paynter; Charles B Eaton; JoAnn E Manson; Lisa W Martin; Jennifer G Robinson; Jacques E Rossouw; Sylvia Wassertheil-Smoller; Paul M Ridker
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2012-03-07       Impact factor: 29.690

5.  Effects of ACE inhibitors, calcium antagonists, and other blood-pressure-lowering drugs: results of prospectively designed overviews of randomised trials. Blood Pressure Lowering Treatment Trialists' Collaboration.

Authors:  B Neal; S MacMahon; N Chapman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2000-12-09       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Diabetes, metformin and incidence of and death from invasive cancer in postmenopausal women: Results from the women's health initiative.

Authors:  Zhihong Gong; Aaron K Aragaki; Rowan T Chlebowski; JoAnn E Manson; Thomas E Rohan; Chu Chen; Mara Z Vitolins; Lesley F Tinker; Erin S LeBlanc; Lewis H Kuller; Lifang Hou; Michael J LaMonte; Juhua Luo; Jean Wactawski-Wende
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2015-12-15       Impact factor: 7.396

7.  Rationale and design of the prevention of cardiac dysfunction during an Adjuvant Breast Cancer Therapy (PRADA) Trial.

Authors:  Siri Lagethon Heck; Geeta Gulati; Anne Hansen Ree; Jeanette Schulz-Menger; Berit Gravdehaug; Helge Røsjø; Kjetil Steine; Ase Bratland; Pavel Hoffmann; Jürgen Geisler; Torbjørn Omland
Journal:  Cardiology       Date:  2012-11-30       Impact factor: 1.869

8.  Progression of coronary calcium and incident coronary heart disease events: MESA (Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis).

Authors:  Matthew J Budoff; Rebekah Young; Victor A Lopez; Richard A Kronmal; Khurram Nasir; Roger S Blumenthal; Robert C Detrano; Diane E Bild; Alan D Guerci; Kiang Liu; Steven Shea; Moyses Szklo; Wendy Post; Joao Lima; Alain Bertoni; Nathan D Wong
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 24.094

9.  Cancer therapy-induced left ventricular dysfunction: interventions and prognosis.

Authors:  Akanksha Thakur; Ronald M Witteles
Journal:  J Card Fail       Date:  2013-12-27       Impact factor: 5.712

10.  Prevention of cardiac dysfunction during adjuvant breast cancer therapy (PRADA): a 2 × 2 factorial, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind clinical trial of candesartan and metoprolol.

Authors:  Geeta Gulati; Siri Lagethon Heck; Anne Hansen Ree; Pavel Hoffmann; Jeanette Schulz-Menger; Morten W Fagerland; Berit Gravdehaug; Florian von Knobelsdorff-Brenkenhoff; Åse Bratland; Tryggve H Storås; Tor-Arne Hagve; Helge Røsjø; Kjetil Steine; Jürgen Geisler; Torbjørn Omland
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2016-02-21       Impact factor: 29.983

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.