Literature DB >> 32250286

YouTube: Searching for answers about breast cancer.

Travis Brachtenbach1, Raquel Cardenas2, Heather Pate2, Luanne Solis2, Lauren Chinnery2, Aaron Bowers1, Matt Vassar1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Breast cancer is the most common cancer in women, affecting approximately 1 in 8 women worldwide. Additionally, it is either the most or second-most lethal cancer depending on ethnicity. Many women and concerned family members turn to the internet for information regarding the signs, symptoms, diagnosis and treatment of this life-altering condition. We sought to objectively evaluate the quality of the information available on YouTube concerning breast cancer.
METHODS: We searched YouTube for videos relating to breast cancer. We included videos that were less than 20 minutes in length, were in the top 200 for most views and were available in English, either subtitled or narrated. Videos were independently and blindly scored using a standardized scoring form. Possible scores ranged from negative infinity to 25.5 with one point being deducted for each misleading statement or claim.
RESULTS: After exclusions, 133 videos in our sample were evaluated. Out of a possible 25.5 points, the true mean was 3.90 with a standard deviation of 1.38. There were only 30 videos (22.5%) that scored more than 7 points. 12 (9.0%) videos scored 0 points or fewer. 12 (9.0%) of the videos in our sample contained at least one misleading statement with 9 of those contained multiple misleading statements with some videos having up to 10 such statements.
CONCLUSION: While YouTube is an important source of information regarding breast cancer, few videos contain a significant amount of quality information and many of the videos contain false or misleading statements. In an area where patients are often scared and searching for answers, there is a significant need for more high-quality videos to educate patients and dispel myths and pseudoscience.

Entities:  

Keywords:  YouTube; breast cancer; evidence-based medicine; media; patient education

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32250286     DOI: 10.3233/BD-200445

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Dis        ISSN: 0888-6008


  2 in total

Review 1.  Netiquette for social media engagement for oncology professionals.

Authors:  Sara Beltrán Ponce; Maura M Barry; Don S Dizon; Matthew S Katz; Martina Murphy; Eleonora Teplinsky; Stacey Tinianov; Deanna J Attai; Merry Jennifer Markham
Journal:  Future Oncol       Date:  2022-02-03       Impact factor: 3.674

2.  Accuracy and Quality of YouTube Videos as a Source of Information on Vitiligo.

Authors:  Louai A Salah; Saad AlTalhab; Aamir Omair; Mohammed AlJasser
Journal:  Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol       Date:  2022-01-07
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.