Literature DB >> 32249932

Rural-Urban Disparities in Otolaryngology: The State of Illinois.

Matthew J Urban1, Christopher Wojcik2, Michael Eggerstedt1, Ashok J Jagasia1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: To highlight rural-urban disparities in otolaryngology, and to quantify the disparities in access to otolaryngology specialist care across Illinois. Several studies across disciplines have shown increased prevalence and severity of disease in rural communities, relative to their urban counterparts. There is very little published quantifying a disparity in rural access to otolaryngologists. STUDY
DESIGN: Population study.
METHODS: Counties in Illinois were classified based on urbanization level on a scale from I (most urban) to VI (least urban) using the 2013 National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) Urban-Rural Classification scheme. The six urbanization levels include four metropolitan (I-IV) and two nonmetropolitan levels (V and VI). The name and practice location of all registered otolaryngologists in Illinois were collected using the American Academy of Otolaryngology website (ENTnet.org). Population data were recorded from the most recent US Census (2010).
RESULTS: Two hundred seventy-eight academy-registered otolaryngologists were identified in Illinois. One hundred fifty-one of these providers were located in a single county categorized as a level I by the NCHS scheme. There are over 18,000 square miles and 600,000 persons living in NCHS level VI counties in Illinois with zero registered otolaryngologists. Overall, metropolitan counties (I-IV) averaged 1.32 otolaryngologists per 100,000 population, whereas nonmetropolitan counties (V and VI) averaged 0.46 otolaryngologists per 100,000 (P < .01).
CONCLUSIONS: There is a paucity of academy-certified otolaryngologists with primary practice locations in rural counties of Illinois. There is a significant rural population and massive land area with limited spatial access to otolaryngologic specialist care. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: NA Laryngoscope, 131:E70-E75, 2021.
© 2020 The American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Rural; disparities; otolaryngology; social determinants of health; urban

Year:  2020        PMID: 32249932     DOI: 10.1002/lary.28652

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Laryngoscope        ISSN: 0023-852X            Impact factor:   3.325


  5 in total

1.  Analysis of socioeconomic factors in laryngology clinic utilization for treatment of dysphonia.

Authors:  Shane W White; Jonathan M Bock; Joel H Blumin; David R Friedland; Jazzmyne A Adams; Ling Tong; Kristen Osinski; Jake Luo
Journal:  Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol       Date:  2021-12-31

2.  Practice Consolidation in Otolaryngology: The Decline of the Single-Provider Practice.

Authors:  Humzah A Quereshy; Brooke A Quinton; Jeremy S Ruthberg; Nicole C Maronian; Todd D Otteson
Journal:  OTO Open       Date:  2022-02-25

3.  The Role of Access and Cost-Effectiveness in Managing Asthma: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Christopher D Codispoti; Matthew Greenhawt; John Oppenheimer
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract       Date:  2022-05-05

4.  Healthcare disparities for the development of airway stenosis from the medical intensive care unit.

Authors:  Clayton Prakash Burruss; Robin B Pappal; Michael A Witt; Christopher Harryman; Syed Z Ali; Matthew L Bush; Mark A Fritz
Journal:  Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol       Date:  2022-07-13

5.  Rapid telehealth implementation into an otolaryngology practice during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Arun Sharma; Ryan Bowman; Sandra L Ettema; Stacie R Gregory; Pardis Javadi; Matthew D Johnson; Marissa L Butcher; Evans Mutua; Brendan C Stack; Dana L Crosby
Journal:  Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol       Date:  2021-05-04
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.