Literature DB >> 32248862

Conversion to psychosis in adolescents and adults: similar proportions, different predictors.

TianHong Zhang1, LiHua Xu1, Ying Chen1, YanYan Wei1, XiaoChen Tang1, YeGang Hu1, ZhiXing Li1, RanPiao Gan1, GuiSen Wu1, HuiRu Cui1, YingYing Tang1, Li Hui2, ChunBo Li1, JiJun Wang1,3,4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Age effects may be important for improving models for the prediction of conversion to psychosis for individuals in the clinical high risk (CHR) state. This study aimed to explore whether adolescent CHR individuals (ages 9-17 years) differ significantly from adult CHR individuals (ages 18-45 years) in terms of conversion rates and predictors.
METHOD: Consecutive CHR individuals (N = 517) were assessed for demographic and clinical characteristics and followed up for 3 years. Individuals with CHR were classified as adolescent (n = 244) or adult (n = 273) groups. Age-specific prediction models of psychosis were generated separately using Cox regression.
RESULTS: Similar conversion rates were found between age groups; 52 out of 216 (24.1%) adolescent CHR individuals and 55 out of 219 (25.1%) CHR adults converted to psychosis. The conversion outcome was best predicted by negative symptoms compared to other clinical variables in CHR adolescents (χ2 = 7.410, p = 0.006). In contrast, positive symptoms better predicted conversion in CHR adults (χ2 = 6.585, p = 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: Adolescent and adult CHR individuals may require a different approach to early identification and prediction. These results can inform the development of more precise prediction models based on age-specific approaches.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cohort study; early onset; schizophrenia; transition; ultra high risk

Year:  2020        PMID: 32248862     DOI: 10.1017/S0033291720000756

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Med        ISSN: 0033-2917            Impact factor:   7.723


  3 in total

Review 1.  A review of negative symptom assessment strategies in youth at clinical high-risk for psychosis.

Authors:  Gregory P Strauss; Andrea Pelletier-Baldelli; Katherine Frost Visser; Elaine F Walker; Vijay A Mittal
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2020-06-07       Impact factor: 4.939

2.  Abnormal neural oscillations in clinical high risk for psychosis: a magnetoencephalography method study.

Authors:  Yegang Hu; Jun Wu; YuJiao Cao; XiaoChen Tang; GuiSen Wu; Qian Guo; LiHua Xu; ZhenYing Qian; YanYan Wei; YingYing Tang; ChunBo Li; Tianhong Zhang; Jijun Wang
Journal:  Gen Psychiatr       Date:  2022-04-28

3.  Negative Prognostic Effect of Baseline Antipsychotic Exposure in Clinical High Risk for Psychosis (CHR-P): Is Pre-Test Risk Enrichment the Hidden Culprit?

Authors:  Andrea Raballo; Michele Poletti; Antonio Preti
Journal:  Int J Neuropsychopharmacol       Date:  2021-09-21       Impact factor: 5.176

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.