Literature DB >> 32248846

The physiological responses to maximal eating in men.

Aaron Hengist1, Robert M Edinburgh1, Russell G Davies1, Jean-Philippe Walhin1, Jariya Buniam1,2, Lewis J James3, Peter J Rogers4,5, Javier T Gonzalez1, James A Betts1.   

Abstract

This study investigated metabolic, endocrine, appetite, and mood responses to a maximal eating occasion in fourteen men (mean ±SD: age 28 ±5 y, body mass 77.2 ±6.6 kg, body mass index 24.2 ±2.2 kg·m-2) who completed two trials in a randomised crossover design. On each occasion participants ate a homogenous mixed-macronutrient meal (pizza). On one occasion, they ate until 'comfortably full' (ad libitum) and on the other until they 'could not eat another bite' (maximal). Mean [95% CI] energy intake was double in the maximal (13,024 [10964, 15084] kJ; 3113 [2620,3605] kcal) compared with the ad libitum trial (6627 [5708,7547] kJ; 1584 [1364,1804] kcal). Serum insulin iAUC increased ~1.5-fold in the maximal compared with ad libitum trial (mean [95% CI] ad libitum 51.1 [33.3,69.0] nmol·L-1·4 h, maximal 78.8 [55.0,102.6] nmol·L-1·4 h, p < 0.01), but glucose iAUC did not differ between trials (ad libitum 94.3 [30.3,158.2] mmol·L-1·4 h, maximal 126.5 [76.9,176.0] mmol·L-1·4 h, p = 0.19). TAG iAUC was ~1.5-fold greater in the maximal versus ad libitum trial (ad libitum 98.6 [69.9,127.2] mmol·L-1·4 h, maximal 146.4 [88.6,204.1] mmol·L-1·4 h, p < 0.01). Total GLP-1, GIP, and PYY iAUC were greater in the maximal compared with ad libitum trial (p < 0.05). Total ghrelin concentrations decreased to a similar extent, but AUC was slightly lower in the maximal versus ad libitum trial (p = 0.02). There were marked differences on appetite and mood between trials, most notably maximal eating caused a prolonged increase in lethargy. Healthy men have capacity to eat twice the calories required to achieve comfortable fullness at a single meal. Postprandial glycaemia is well-regulated following initial overeating, with elevated postprandial insulinaemia likely contributing.

Entities:  

Keywords:  appetite; appetite hormones; glucose; insulin; maximal eating; metabolism; postprandial; triglycerides

Year:  2020        PMID: 32248846     DOI: 10.1017/S0007114520001270

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Nutr        ISSN: 0007-1145            Impact factor:   3.718


  3 in total

1.  Human and mouse muscle transcriptomic analyses identify insulin receptor mRNA downregulation in hyperinsulinemia-associated insulin resistance.

Authors:  Haoning Howard Cen; Bahira Hussein; José Diego Botezelli; Su Wang; Jiashuo Aaron Zhang; Nilou Noursadeghi; Niels Jessen; Brian Rodrigues; James A Timmons; James D Johnson
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  2022-01       Impact factor: 5.834

2.  Time to revisit the passive overconsumption hypothesis? Humans show sensitivity to calories in energy-rich meals.

Authors:  Annika N Flynn; Kevin D Hall; Amber B Courville; Peter J Rogers; Jeffrey M Brunstrom
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2022-08-04       Impact factor: 8.472

3.  A Comparison of Intermittent and Continuous Exercise Bouts at Different Intensities on Appetite and Postprandial Metabolic Responses in Healthy Men.

Authors:  Lewis R Mattin; Victoria J McIver; Adora Mo Wah Yau; Lewis J James; Gethin H Evans
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2020-08-07       Impact factor: 5.717

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.