Literature DB >> 32248332

Usefulness of left atrial speckle tracking echocardiography in predicting recurrence of atrial fibrillation after radiofrequency ablation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Anne Bjerg Nielsen1, Kristoffer Grundtvig Skaarup2, Mats Christian Højbjerg Lassen2, Kasper Djernæs2, Morten Lock Hansen2, Jesper Hastrup Svendsen3,4, Arne Johannessen2, Jim Hansen2, Samuel Kiil Sørensen2, Gunnar Gislason2,4, Tor Biering-Sørensen2,5.   

Abstract

The usefulness of peak atrial longitudinal strain (PALS) in identifying patients at high risk of atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence after radiofrequency ablation (RFA) has been investigated in several small AF populations. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to investigate whether PALS predicts recurrence of AF after RFA treatment. MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library were searched. Studies investigating the value of PALS in predicting successful RFA in AF patients were selected. Patients underwent echocardiography prior to RFA. Risk of bias was evaluated using the Quality in Prognosis Studies (QUIPS) Tool. Twelve studies and a total of 1025 patients suffering from paroxysmal or persistent AF were included. Odds ratios (OR) were assessed in a random and fixed effects model for univariable and multivariable pooled analyses respectively. PALS was found to be a significant predictor of AF recurrence after RFA across study populations (Univariable: OR: 1.17, CI95% [1.03-1.34], p = 0.018, per 1% decrease) (Multivariable: OR: 1.16, CI95% [1.09-1.24], p < 0.001, per 1% decrease). Patients with recurrence had significantly lower PALS prior to RFA than patients who maintained sinus rhythm (15.7 ± 5.7% vs. 23.0 ± 7.0%, p = 0.016). A pooled analysis of weighted mean differences (WMD) also showed a significant difference in PALS between the two groups (WMD: - 6.57, CI95% [- 8.49: - 4.65], p < 0.001). Lower values of PALS are associated with an increased risk of AF recurrence after RFA. PALS provides prognostic value in clinical practice.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Atrial fibrillation; Catheter ablation; Echocardiography; Imaging; Meta-analysis; Prognosis

Year:  2020        PMID: 32248332     DOI: 10.1007/s10554-020-01828-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1569-5794            Impact factor:   2.357


  5 in total

1.  Value of echocardiography in evaluating efficacy of radiofrequency catheter ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Ying Li; Bing Han; Jinfang Li; Fei Ge; Lianwei Yang
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2022-03-15       Impact factor: 4.060

2.  Detection of atrial fibrosis using echocardiographic strain: a new pathway.

Authors:  Maria Mariana Barros Melo da Silveira; João Victor Batista Cabral; Amanda Tavares Xavier; Lucas Reis da Costa; Dhouglas José Ferreira do Nascimento; José Maria Del Castillo; Luydson Richardson da Silva Vasconcelos; Dário Celestino Sobral Filho; Dinaldo Cavalcanti de Oliveira
Journal:  Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992)       Date:  2022-06-24       Impact factor: 1.712

3.  Prediction of Left Atrial Fibrosis and Success of Catheter Ablation by Speckle Tracking Echocardiography in Patients Imaged in Persistent Atrial Fibrillation.

Authors:  Sébastien Marchandise; Quentin Garnir; Christophe Scavée; Varnavas Varnavas; Jean-Benoit le Polain de Waroux; Aurélien Wauters; Christophe Beauloye; Véronique Roelants; Bernhard L Gerber
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-05-25

4.  Incremental value of left atrial strain to predict atrial fibrillation recurrence after cryoballoon ablation.

Authors:  Andreea Motoc; Maria-Luiza Luchian; Esther Scheirlynck; Bram Roosens; Hadischat Chameleva; Maxim Gevers; Xavier Galloo; Berlinde von Kemp; Robbert Ramak; Juan Sieira; Carlo de Asmundis; Gian-Battista Chierchia; Julien Magne; Caroline Weytjens; Steven Droogmans; Bernard Cosyns
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-11-19       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  Clinical utility of left atrial strain in predicting atrial fibrillation recurrence after catheter ablation: An up-to-date review.

Authors:  Zhi-Xi Yu; Wen Yang; Wei-Si Yin; Ke-Xin Peng; Yi-Lin Pan; Wei-Wei Chen; Bei-Bei Du; Yu-Quan He; Ping Yang
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2022-08-16       Impact factor: 1.534

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.