Tyler Maher1,2, Martina Deleuse2, Sangeetha Thondre2, Amir Shafat3, Miriam E Clegg4,5. 1. Diet and Cardiometabolic Health Research Group, Department of Nutritional Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, SE1 9NH, UK. 2. Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Oxford Brookes Centre for Nutrition and Health, Oxford Brookes University, Gipsy Lane, Oxford, OX3 0BP, UK. 3. Physiology, School of Medicine, National University of Ireland, Galway, H91 W5P7, Ireland. 4. Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Oxford Brookes Centre for Nutrition and Health, Oxford Brookes University, Gipsy Lane, Oxford, OX3 0BP, UK. m.e.clegg@reading.ac.uk. 5. Department of Food and Nutritional Sciences, University of Reading, Harry Nursten Building, Whiteknights, Reading, RG6 6AP, UK. m.e.clegg@reading.ac.uk.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Inconsistent evidence exists for greater satiety after medium-chain triglycerides (MCT) or conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) compared to long-chain triglycerides (LCT). Furthermore, the mechanisms are poorly understood and effects in people with a healthy weight and those with overweight/obesity have not been compared. This study aimed to compare appetite responses in these groups and examine the mechanisms behind any differences. METHODS: Fifteen participants with healthy weight (BMI: 22.7 ± 1.9 kg·m-2) and fourteen participants with overweight/obesity (BMI: 30.9 ± 3.9 kg·m-2) consumed a breakfast containing either 23.06 g vegetable oil (CON), 25.00 g MCT oil (MCT), or 6.25 g CLA and 16.80 g vegetable oil (CLA). Appetite, peptide YY (PYY), total ghrelin (TG), β-hydroxybutyrate, and gastric emptying (GE) were measured throughout. Energy intake was assessed at an ad libitum lunch and throughout the following ~ 36 h. RESULTS: Neither MCT nor CLA decreased ad libitum intake; however MCT decreased day 1 energy intake (P = 0.031) and the 48-h period (P = 0.005) compared to CON. MCT delayed GE (P ≤ 0.01) compared to CON, whereas CLA did not. PYY and TG concentrations were not different (P = 0.743 and P = 0.188, respectively), but MCT increased β-hydroxybutyrate concentrations compared to CON (P = 0.005) and CLA (P < 0.001). β-hydroxybutyrate concentrations were higher in participants with overweight/obesity (P = 0.009). CONCLUSION: Consumption of MCT reduces energy intake in the subsequent 48 h, whereas CLA does not. Delayed gastric emptying or increased β-hydroxybutyrate concentrations may mediate this.
PURPOSE: Inconsistent evidence exists for greater satiety after medium-chain triglycerides (MCT) or conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) compared to long-chain triglycerides (LCT). Furthermore, the mechanisms are poorly understood and effects in people with a healthy weight and those with overweight/obesity have not been compared. This study aimed to compare appetite responses in these groups and examine the mechanisms behind any differences. METHODS: Fifteen participants with healthy weight (BMI: 22.7 ± 1.9 kg·m-2) and fourteen participants with overweight/obesity (BMI: 30.9 ± 3.9 kg·m-2) consumed a breakfast containing either 23.06 g vegetable oil (CON), 25.00 g MCT oil (MCT), or 6.25 g CLA and 16.80 g vegetable oil (CLA). Appetite, peptide YY (PYY), total ghrelin (TG), β-hydroxybutyrate, and gastric emptying (GE) were measured throughout. Energy intake was assessed at an ad libitum lunch and throughout the following ~ 36 h. RESULTS: Neither MCT nor CLA decreased ad libitum intake; however MCT decreased day 1 energy intake (P = 0.031) and the 48-h period (P = 0.005) compared to CON. MCT delayed GE (P ≤ 0.01) compared to CON, whereas CLA did not. PYY and TG concentrations were not different (P = 0.743 and P = 0.188, respectively), but MCT increased β-hydroxybutyrate concentrations compared to CON (P = 0.005) and CLA (P < 0.001). β-hydroxybutyrate concentrations were higher in participants with overweight/obesity (P = 0.009). CONCLUSION: Consumption of MCT reduces energy intake in the subsequent 48 h, whereas CLA does not. Delayed gastric emptying or increased β-hydroxybutyrate concentrations may mediate this.
Entities:
Keywords:
Appetite; Energy intake; Food intake; Gut-peptide hormones; Ketones; Lipids
Authors: P Janssen; P Vanden Berghe; S Verschueren; A Lehmann; I Depoortere; J Tack Journal: Aliment Pharmacol Ther Date: 2011-02-22 Impact factor: 8.171
Authors: J Blundell; C de Graaf; T Hulshof; S Jebb; B Livingstone; A Lluch; D Mela; S Salah; E Schuring; H van der Knaap; M Westerterp Journal: Obes Rev Date: 2010-01-29 Impact factor: 9.213
Authors: Karen E Foster-Schubert; Joost Overduin; Catherine E Prudom; Jianhua Liu; Holly S Callahan; Bruce D Gaylinn; Michael O Thorner; David E Cummings Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2008-01-15 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Kate L Feltrin; Tanya J Little; James H Meyer; Michael Horowitz; Andre J P M Smout; Judith Wishart; Amelia N Pilichiewicz; Thomas Rades; Ian M Chapman; Christine Feinle-Bisset Journal: Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol Date: 2004-05-27 Impact factor: 3.619