Constantinos A Parisinos1, Henry R Wilman2, E Louise Thomas3, Matt Kelly4, Rowan C Nicholls4, John McGonigle4, Stefan Neubauer5, Aroon D Hingorani6, Riyaz S Patel6, Harry Hemingway7, Jimmy D Bell3, Rajarshi Banerjee4, Hanieh Yaghootkar8. 1. Institute of Health Informatics, Faculty of Population Health Sciences, University College London, London, UK. Electronic address: c.parisinos@ucl.ac.uk. 2. Research Centre for Optimal Health, School of Life Sciences, University of Westminster, London, UK; Perspectum Diagnostics Ltd., Oxford, UK. 3. Research Centre for Optimal Health, School of Life Sciences, University of Westminster, London, UK. 4. Perspectum Diagnostics Ltd., Oxford, UK. 5. Perspectum Diagnostics Ltd., Oxford, UK; Oxford Centre for Clinical Magnetic Resonance Research, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Oxford NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. 6. Institute of Cardiovascular Science, Faculty of Population Health Sciences, University College London, London, UK. 7. Health Data Research UK London, Institute of Health Informatics, Faculty of Population Health Sciences, University College London, London, UK. 8. Research Centre for Optimal Health, School of Life Sciences, University of Westminster, London, UK; Genetics of Complex Traits, College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK; Division of Medical Sciences, Department of Health Sciences, Luleå University of Technology, Luleå, Sweden. Electronic address: h.yaghootkar@exeter.ac.uk.
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS: MRI-based corrected T1 (cT1) is a non-invasive method to grade the severity of steatohepatitis and liver fibrosis. We aimed to identify genetic variants influencing liver cT1 and use genetics to understand mechanisms underlying liver fibroinflammatory disease and its link with other metabolic traits and diseases. METHODS: First, we performed a genome-wide association study (GWAS) in 14,440 Europeans, with liver cT1 measures, from the UK Biobank. Second, we explored the effects of the cT1 variants on liver blood tests, and a range of metabolic traits and diseases. Third, we used Mendelian randomisation to test the causal effects of 24 predominantly metabolic traits on liver cT1 measures. RESULTS: We identified 6 independent genetic variants associated with liver cT1 that reached the GWAS significance threshold (p <5×10-8). Four of the variants (rs759359281 in SLC30A10, rs13107325 in SLC39A8, rs58542926 in TM6SF2, rs738409 in PNPLA3) were also associated with elevated aminotransferases and had variable effects on liver fat and other metabolic traits. Insulin resistance, type 2 diabetes, non-alcoholic fatty liver and body mass index were causally associated with elevated cT1, whilst favourable adiposity (instrumented by variants associated with higher adiposity but lower risk of cardiometabolic disease and lower liver fat) was found to be protective. CONCLUSION: The association between 2 metal ion transporters and cT1 indicates an important new mechanism in steatohepatitis. Future studies are needed to determine whether interventions targeting the identified transporters might prevent liver disease in at-risk individuals. LAY SUMMARY: We estimated levels of liver inflammation and scarring based on magnetic resonance imaging of 14,440 UK Biobank participants. We performed a genetic study and identified variations in 6 genes associated with levels of liver inflammation and scarring. Participants with variations in 4 of these genes also had higher levels of markers of liver cell injury in blood samples, further validating their role in liver health. Two identified genes are involved in the transport of metal ions in our body. Further investigation of these variations may lead to better detection, assessment, and/or treatment of liver inflammation and scarring.
BACKGROUND & AIMS: MRI-based corrected T1 (cT1) is a non-invasive method to grade the severity of steatohepatitis and liver fibrosis. We aimed to identify genetic variants influencing liver cT1 and use genetics to understand mechanisms underlying liver fibroinflammatory disease and its link with other metabolic traits and diseases. METHODS: First, we performed a genome-wide association study (GWAS) in 14,440 Europeans, with liver cT1 measures, from the UK Biobank. Second, we explored the effects of the cT1 variants on liver blood tests, and a range of metabolic traits and diseases. Third, we used Mendelian randomisation to test the causal effects of 24 predominantly metabolic traits on liver cT1 measures. RESULTS: We identified 6 independent genetic variants associated with liver cT1 that reached the GWAS significance threshold (p <5×10-8). Four of the variants (rs759359281 in SLC30A10, rs13107325 in SLC39A8, rs58542926 in TM6SF2, rs738409 in PNPLA3) were also associated with elevated aminotransferases and had variable effects on liver fat and other metabolic traits. Insulin resistance, type 2 diabetes, non-alcoholic fatty liver and body mass index were causally associated with elevated cT1, whilst favourable adiposity (instrumented by variants associated with higher adiposity but lower risk of cardiometabolic disease and lower liver fat) was found to be protective. CONCLUSION: The association between 2 metal ion transporters and cT1 indicates an important new mechanism in steatohepatitis. Future studies are needed to determine whether interventions targeting the identified transporters might prevent liver disease in at-risk individuals. LAY SUMMARY: We estimated levels of liver inflammation and scarring based on magnetic resonance imaging of 14,440 UK Biobank participants. We performed a genetic study and identified variations in 6 genes associated with levels of liver inflammation and scarring. Participants with variations in 4 of these genes also had higher levels of markers of liver cell injury in blood samples, further validating their role in liver health. Two identified genes are involved in the transport of metal ions in our body. Further investigation of these variations may lead to better detection, assessment, and/or treatment of liver inflammation and scarring.
Non-alcoholic and alcoholic fatty liver diseases are common in an era of widespread obesity and concerning alcohol use., They affect up to a third of the adult population worldwide and account for the vast majority of chronic liver diseases. However, an important paradox in the history of liver fat accumulation exists; despite the large proportion of adults affected by simple steatosis (fatty liver), only a relatively small proportion (2.4–12.8%) will experience significant liver disease or liver-related death.It is important to identify which individuals are at risk of developing the more inflammatory phenotype, steatohepatitis (a condition characterised by lipotoxicity and histological necroinflammation), which is considered to be the main pathophysiological driver of liver fibrosis and subsequent disease progression. Steatohepatitis and fibrosis affect approximately 1 in 10 middle-aged adults, and can lead to cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma and death.A promising, non-invasive measure of steatohepatitis and fibrosis severity is MRI-based corrected T1 (cT1) (Fig. 1A).[7], [8], [9] T1 relaxation time reflects extracellular fluid, which is characteristic of fibrosis and inflammation. The presence of iron, which can be determined from T2∗ maps, has an opposing effect. Combining T2∗ and T1 values can correct for this opposing effect, from which cT1 (in milliseconds) is derived. Higher cT1 values are associated with both histological liver inflammation and fibrosis, although their relative contributions to the score are still unknown., cT1 has already been used as a non-invasive outcome measure in randomised controlled trials for non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) and is associated with liver disease outcomes.
UK Biobank is a prospective cohort study that consists of over 500,000 individuals aged 37–73 years (99.5% were between 40 and 69 years of age) who were recruited between 2006 and 2010 from across the UK. This research has been conducted using the data obtained via UK Biobank Access Application number 9914. The UK Biobank has approval from the North West Multi-Centre Research Ethics Committee (ref: 11/NW/0382) and obtained written informed consent from all participants prior to the study.
Protocols for the participant genotyping, data collection, and quality control have previously been described in detail. Briefly, participants were genotyped using 1 of 2 purpose-designed arrays (UK BiLEVE Axiom Array [n = 50,520] and UK Biobank Axiom Array [n = 438,692]) with 95% marker overlap. We excluded individuals who were identified by the UK Biobank as outliers based on either genotyping missingness rate or heterogeneity, or whose sex inferred from the genotypes did not match their self-reported sex. We removed individuals with a missingness >5% across variants which passed our quality control procedure. We used the latest release which included imputed data using 2 reference panels: a combined UK10K and 1000 Genomes panel and the Haplotype Reference Consortium panel. We limited our analysis to genetic variants with a minimum minor allele frequency (MAF) >1% and imputation quality score >0.3.To define “white European” ancestry, we first used data from 1000 genomes samples to generate ancestry informative principal components (PCs). We then used these PCs in UK Biobank participants and employed K-means clustering to identify samples clustered with the 3 main 1000 genomes populations (European, African, and South Asian). Those clustered with the 1000 genomes’ “European” cluster were classified as having European ancestry.In total, after image analysis and quality control steps, liver cT1 and PDFF measures were available for 14,440 white European individuals who also had genetic data available and were classified as white European.
Genome-wide association analysis
We used BOLT-LMM v2.3.4 to conduct a linear mixed model GWAS which accounts for population structure and relatedness. We increased our power by including all related individuals of European descent (n = 14,440). The relatedness matrix was computed using common (MAF >5%) genotyped variants that passed quality control in all 106 batches and were present on both genotyping arrays. Prior to association testing, liver cT1 and PDFF were inverse-normal transformed. We used age, sex, centre and genotyping arrays as covariates in the model.
Sensitivity analyses
We performed 6 sensitivity analyses (Table S1). We carried out GWASs and adjusted for (i) BMI and (ii) alcohol units consumed. We derived an alcohol units per day variable from the UK Biobank as previously suggested. In summary, a 125 ml glass of wine (red, white, or sparkling) was considered to be 1.5 units, a pint of beer or cider was considered to be 2.8 units, other alcoholic drinks (e.g. alcopops) were considered to be 1.5 units, and a measure of spirit was considered to be 1 unit. We further adjusted for (iii) MRI-determined liver fat and (iv) liver iron to rule out the confounding effects of these 2 traits in our image processing pipeline. Finally, we carried out GWASs in (v) males and (vi) females separately to detect sex-specific associations.
Association of cT1 variants with liver biomarkers and metabolic traits and diseases
To further understand the role of each cT1 variant in the pathophysiology of liver disease, and also as a positive control, we tested the association between each variant and liver biomarkers in white European participants from the UK Biobank. We measured the following liver biomarkers: liver enzymes (alanine aminotransferase [ALT], aspartate aminotransferase [AST], gamma glutamyltransferase, alkaline phosphatase in up to 378,821 individuals), MRI-derived liver PDFF (n = 14,440), and MRI-derived liver iron (to understand if the correction of T1 measures for liver iron content has caused any bias; n = 14,440). The protocols for the derivation of MRI PDFF and liver iron have previously been published., To validate the associations with aminotransferases in a non-UK Biobank dataset, we looked up the effects of cT1 variants in an existing GWAS of ALT and AST levels in up to 61,089 individuals.To understand the effect of cT1 variants on cardiometabolic traits and diseases, we tested their associations with 15 predominantly metabolic traits including BMI, HDL-cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol, triglycerides, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, type 2 diabetes, and coronary artery disease in up to n = 379,308 white European UK Biobank participants.
LD score regression and cross-trait genetic correlation analysis
We used LD Hub to conduct linkage disequilibrium (LD) score regression and heritability analysis. LD Hub is a centralised database of summary level GWAS for >500 diseases and traits from publicly available resources/consortia and uses a web interface that automates LD score regression, heritability and cross-trait genetic correlation analysis. We ran heritability analysis as well as genetic correlation analysis across 120 potentially relevant traits. Single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP)-based heritability (h2SNP) is the proportion of total variation in liver cT1 measures due to the additive genetic variation between individuals in our study population.
Liver cirrhosis variants
To investigate the effect of liver cirrhosis variants on cT1 measures, and also as a positive control, we used variants associated with all-cause cirrhosis including rs2642438 (in or near MARC1), rs72613567 (HSD17B13), rs58542926 (TM6SF2), rs738409 (PNPLA3), rs1800562 (HFE), and rs28929474 (SERPINA).
Mendelian randomisation
We investigated the potential causal associations between 24 predominantly metabolic traits on cT1 using 2-sample Mendelian randomisation analysis. We used the inverse variance weighted approach (IVW) as our main analysis, and Mendelian randomisation-Egger and penalised weighted median as sensitivity analyses in order to detect unidentified pleiotropy of our genetic instruments. Genetic instruments were constructed by using the independent genome-wide significant genetic variants (R2 <0.1) of the exposure of interest from previous GWASs. For more information on Mendelian randomisation and genetic instrument selection please see the Supplementary Material.
Results
The characteristics of liver cT1 cohort
In our discovery cohort, median age was 57 years (interquartile range (IQR) 50–62) for males and 55 years (IQR 48–60) for females. The median liver cT1 was 694 ms (IQR 662–730) in males and 676 ms (IQR 647–710) in females (Fig. S1); 5.3% of males (299/5,595) and 2.6% of females (169/6,455) had values above 800 ms, a threshold that has been set in current clinical trials as a cut-off for steatohepatitis, and is under evaluation by the FDA and EMA as a diagnostic enrichment biomarker for NASH. Baseline characteristics were comparable to the rest of the UK Biobank cohort who did not participate in the imaging study except BMI, waist circumference and diabetes prevalence which were lower in both males and females in the liver cT1 cohort compared to the rest of the UK Biobank (Table 1). Although invitation was not based on any medical information, MRI exclusion criteria (e.g. metal or electrical implants, surgery 6 weeks prior to appointment, severe hearing or breathing problems) and the imaging site location (Cheadle, UK) may have contributed to a slightly healthier cohort.
Table 1
Characteristics of UK Biobank participants in the imaging subset and the subset of participants who were not part of the imaging study.
Characteristics
UK Biobank imaging subset
UK Biobank non-imaging subset
Men
Women
Men
Women
n (%)
7,142
8,396
229,134
273,402
Age, years (IQR)
57 (50–62)
55 (48–60)
58 (50–64)
57 (50–63)
Waist circumference, cm (IQR)∗
94 (87–100)
79 (73–87)
96 (89–103)
83 (75–92)
Townsend deprivation index (IQR)
−2.78 (−3.98 to 0.82)
−2.66 (−3.90 to −0.69)
−2.12 (−3.65 to 0.63)
−2.14 (−3.63 to 0.49)
Self-reported diabetes (%)∗
245 (3.43%)
116 (1.38%)
15,950 (7.0%)
9,794 (3.6%)
Liver cT1, ms (IQR)
694 (662–730)
676 (647–710)
n.a.
n.a.
BMI, kg/m2 (IQR)∗
26.6 (24.5–28.8)
25 (22.9–28)
27.3 (25–30.1)
26.1 (23.5–30)
BMI (Mann-Whitney U test, p = 1×10−80), waist circumference (Mann-Whitney U test, p = 1×10−100), diabetes prevalence (Pearson's chi squared test, p = 1×10−27) were lower in the imaging subset compared to the rest of UK Biobank. Levels of significance for all tests: (p <0.05).
Characteristics of UK Biobank participants in the imaging subset and the subset of participants who were not part of the imaging study.BMI (Mann-Whitney U test, p = 1×10−80), waist circumference (Mann-Whitney U test, p = 1×10−100), diabetes prevalence (Pearson's chi squared test, p = 1×10−27) were lower in the imaging subset compared to the rest of UK Biobank. Levels of significance for all tests: (p <0.05).
Genetic variants in 6 loci show association with liver cT1
In our GWAS of liver cT1 in individuals of European ancestry, variants in 6 independent loci (Table 2) reached genome-wide significance. Genomic inflation was low (λGC = 1.006, Fig. S2). We observed the strongest association with a missense variant, rs13107325, located in an exon of SLC39A8 (Fig. 1B). The minor allele (T; allele frequency 7%) of rs13107325 was associated with 0.54 SD increase in cT1 (p = 1.2×10−133). The mean cT1 was 692 ms in individuals with no risk allele, 727 ms in heterozygotes, and 772 ms in risk allele homozygotes (Fig. S3).
Table 2
The association between 6 independent genetic variants and liver cT1. A linear mixed model was used for genetic associations (levels of significance: p <5×10−8).
The association between 6 independent genetic variants and liver cT1. A linear mixed model was used for genetic associations (levels of significance: p <5×10−8).Effects are in SD.CHR, chromosome; EA, effect allele; EAF, effect allele frequency; OA, other allele.Other independent variants included an intronic variant (rs759359281-CA >C) in SLC30A10 (p = 2.8×10−8), a missense variant (rs111723834-G >A) in PCK2 (p = 3.0×10−11), a missense variant (rs4820268-A >G) in TMPRSS6 (p = 1.6×10−9), and 2 known cirrhosis variants (rs58542926-A >G) in TM6SF2 (p = 1.4×10−8) and (rs738409-C >G) in PNPLA3 (p = 9.6×10−13). The 6 variants together explained 5.38% of variation in cT1 measures in white European UK Biobank participants with the SLC39A8 variant explaining most of this variation (3.95%) (Table 2). We estimated the SNP-based heritability (h2SNP) of liver cT1 to be 20%. This is higher than the heritability estimated for conditions and traits such as coronary artery disease (7%), eczema (7%), body fat % (10%) and transferrin (16%), but lower than non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) (22–34%).We did not detect any sex-specific associations and the effects were similar between men and women (Table S1). Sensitivity analyses that further controlled for alcohol unit intake and BMI did not identify any additional signals and did not significantly change the effect size (Table S1). Sensitivity analyses that controlled for liver PDFF removed the effects of rs58542926 in TM6SF2 and rs738409 in PNPLA3, suggesting that the effects of these variants on cT1 measures are mediated through liver fat accumulation (Table S1). The cT1 increasing allele (G) at TMPRSS6-rs4820268 is associated with lower plasma iron levels and lower liver iron. The effect of this variant on cT1 may be due to its effect on liver iron concentrations since iron has an opposing effect to T1 relaxation time. However, sensitivity analyses that controlled for liver iron only slightly attenuated its effect on cT1 (from beta = 0.066, p = 2×10−9 to beta = 0.054, p = 7×10−7) suggesting that other mechanisms are involved and that this is a true signal.
Genetic variants in 4 loci show association with liver MRI-determined PDFF
In our GWAS of liver PDFF in 14,440 individuals of European ancestry missense variants in 4 independent loci reached genome-wide significance (rs1260326-C >T in GCKR, p = 3.9×10−8, rs58542926-C >T in TM6SF2, p = 6.3×10−37, rs429358-C >T in APOE, p = 5.6×10−11, rs738409-C >G in PNPLA3, p = 5.4×10−66 (Table S2, Fig. S4). Genomic inflation was low (λGC = 1.04). Two of the 4 variants (rs738409 in PNPLA3, rs58542926 in TM6SF2) were shared between PDFF and cT1 in our GWASs.
Four of the cT1 variants are associated with higher levels of aminotransferases and demonstrate variable effects on metabolic traits and diseases
To validate these variants and further understand their role in other metabolic traits and diseases, we investigated their association with liver blood tests, MRI-determined liver iron and liver PDFF, lipids, blood pressure, BMI and cardiometabolic disease outcomes (Fig. 2, Table S3). cT1-increasing alleles at 4 variants (in SLC30A10, SLC39A8, TM6SF2, and PNPLA3) were associated with higher ALT and AST (all with p values <2×10−5) and higher risk of type 2 diabetes (all with p <0.002, except the SLC30A10 variant). None of cT1 variants were associated with cardiovascular disease risk, whilst their effects on other metabolic traits including lipids and blood pressure were variable (Fig. 2). Among the novel identified and replicated variants (rs759359281 in SLC30A10, and rs13107325 in SLC39A8), only the latter was available in a non-UK Biobank cohort with available liver blood tests. The cT1-increasing allele in rs13107325 showed a similar direction of effect on ALT (n = 46,316, beta = 0.01, p = 0.27) and AST (n = 39,015, beta = 0.014, p = 0.0005) levels in an independent cohort (Table S4).
Fig. 2
Forest plot of the associations of liver cT1 variants with liver and metabolic phenotypes.
Effects are in SD for continuous traits and log(OR) for disease outcomes per copy of the risk allele. A linear mixed model was used for genetic associations. Levels of significance: p <0.05. ALP, alkaline phosphatase; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; CAD, coronary artery disease; cT1, corrected T1; GGT, gamma-glutamyltransferase; HDL-C, HDL-cholesterol; LDL-C, LDL cholesterol; OR, odds ratio; T2DM, type 2 diabetes.
Forest plot of the associations of liver cT1 variants with liver and metabolic phenotypes.Effects are in SD for continuous traits and log(OR) for disease outcomes per copy of the risk allele. A linear mixed model was used for genetic associations. Levels of significance: p <0.05. ALP, alkaline phosphatase; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; CAD, coronary artery disease; cT1, corrected T1; GGT, gamma-glutamyltransferase; HDL-C, HDL-cholesterol; LDL-C, LDL cholesterol; OR, odds ratio; T2DM, type 2 diabetes.
Liver cT1 measures correlate genetically with components of metabolic syndrome
We calculated genetic correlations using the GWAS summary statistics (120 predominantly metabolic traits/diseases) in LD score regression analysis (Fig. 3, Table S5). Measures of insulin resistance, triglycerides, VLDL, type 2 diabetes, coronary artery disease, body fat percentage, BMI and waist-to-hip ratio were positively genetically correlated with liver cT1 measures after correcting p values for multiple testing (false discovery rate <0.05). The most genetically correlated traits were homeostatic model for insulin resistance (HOMA-IR, r = 0.53, p = 0.0004) and mean diameter of VLDL particles (r = 0.52, p = 0.0004), whereas the strongest inverse correlation was seen with total cholesterol in very large HDL (r = -0.62, p = 0.04).
Fig. 3
LD regression analysis.
Fig. demonstrating the significant genetic correlations (rg) between cT1 and metabolic traits following correction for multiple testing (levels of significance: p false discovery rate <0.05) among more than 120 traits. The colours correspond to significance of correlation (t test); red: p <1×10−8; orange: 1×10−6
LD regression analysis.Fig. demonstrating the significant genetic correlations (rg) between cT1 and metabolic traits following correction for multiple testing (levels of significance: p false discovery rate <0.05) among more than 120 traits. The colours correspond to significance of correlation (t test); red: p <1×10−8; orange: 1×10−6
Association of liver cirrhosis variants with liver cT1
We investigated the effects of all-cause cirrhosis risk variants on cT1 values. Among 6 variants associated with all-cause cirrhosis in a recent GWAS of 5,770 cases and 572,850 controls, 4 variants (those in or near MARC1, HSD17B13, TM6SF2 and PNPLA3) demonstrated associations with cT1 (Table 3), where alleles associated with higher risk of liver cirrhosis were also associated with higher cT1. The HFE haemochromatosis risk allele (in rs1800562) was inversely associated with cT1, however this is to be expected since cT1 measures are corrected for liver iron content. Consistently, this association became remarkably attenuated (from beta = −0.11, p = 8×10−7 to beta = −0.055, p = 0.02) in our sensitivity analysis correcting for liver iron content. In the GWAS of all-cause cirrhosis, the effect of a1-antitrypsin risk variant (rs28929474 in SERPINA1) was very weak (p = 0.01) and present only when a recessive model was used (Table 3). We did not have any risk allele homozygotes in our liver cT1 cohort and therefore could not perform a recessive model of associations with cT1.
Table 3
Effects of all-cause cirrhosis risk alleles on liver cT1.
∗Indicates recessive models were run for the previously published all-cause cirrhosis GWAS; all other association analyses used additive models. Logistic regression was used for the genetic associations with cirrhosis; a linear mixed model was used for the genetic associations with cT1 (levels of significance: p <5x10−8, suggestive p <0.05).
Beta cirrhosis is the effect on all-cause cirrhosis in log(OR) and Beta cT1 is the effect on cT1 in SD.
Effects of all-cause cirrhosis risk alleles on liver cT1.CHR, chromosome; cT1, corrected T1; EA, effect allele; EAF, effect allele frequency; GWAS, genome-wide associated study; OA, other allele; OR, odds ratio; SNP, single-nucleotide polymorphism.∗Indicates recessive models were run for the previously published all-cause cirrhosis GWAS; all other association analyses used additive models. Logistic regression was used for the genetic associations with cirrhosis; a linear mixed model was used for the genetic associations with cT1 (levels of significance: p <5x10−8, suggestive p <0.05).Beta cirrhosis is the effect on all-cause cirrhosis in log(OR) and Beta cT1 is the effect on cT1 in SD.
Mendelian randomisation analysis provides genetic evidence that non-alcoholic fatty liver, insulin resistance and obesity causally elevate liver cT1
Demonstrating causality using observational studies can be challenging due to the presence of confounders such as other features of metabolic syndrome and behaviours including smoking and alcohol intake. In UK Biobank, we detected a strong correlation between cT1 and BMI (r2 = 0.36, p = 5×10−324) and also between cT1 and MRI-determined liver fat PDFF (r2 = 0.62, p = 5×10−324), and a weak but significant inverse correlation with liver iron (r2 = -0.069, p = 6.6×10−18), which is to be expected since cT1 measures were corrected for liver iron (Fig. S5). We used genetic methods (Mendelian randomisation, Fig. 4) that are generally free of biases such as confounding and reverse causation to examine the potential causal effect of metabolic traits on liver cT1. We found evidence of a causal association between insulin resistance (IVW p = 0.0001), non-alcoholic fatty liver (IVW p = 0.01), type 2 diabetes (IVW p = 0.004), BMI (IVW p = 0.002) and higher cT1. We also found evidence for a protective role of favourable adiposity variants (variants associated with higher adiposity but lower risk of cardiometabolic diseases and lower ectopic fat) and cT1 (IVW p = 0.01) (Table S6). Our analyses were robust across a range of sensitivity analyses (Table S6).
Fig. 4
Mendelian randomisation investigating the effect of 24 predominantly metabolic traits on liver cT1.
We used 2-sample Mendelian randomisation analysis to investigate the causal effects of metabolic traits on liver cT1. For full results, including sensitivity analyses, please see Table S4. The inverse variance weighted test was used as the main analysis. Levels of significance: p <0.05. 2hGlu, 2 hour glucose tolerance test; cT1, corrected T1; NAFLD, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease; WHR_BMI, waist hip ratio adjusted for BMI.
Mendelian randomisation investigating the effect of 24 predominantly metabolic traits on liver cT1.We used 2-sample Mendelian randomisation analysis to investigate the causal effects of metabolic traits on liver cT1. For full results, including sensitivity analyses, please see Table S4. The inverse variance weighted test was used as the main analysis. Levels of significance: p <0.05. 2hGlu, 2 hour glucose tolerance test; cT1, corrected T1; NAFLD, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease; WHR_BMI, waist hip ratio adjusted for BMI.
Discussion
We identified associations between 6 independent genetic variants and MRI-based liver cT1, a non-invasive marker of liver inflammation and fibrosis, in 14,440 participants from the UK Biobank. These include 5 missense variants (in SLC39A8, PCK2, TM6SF2, PNPLA3, and TMPRSS6) and 1 intronic variant (in SLC30A10). The cT1-increasing alleles in 4 genes (SLC39A8, SLC30A10, PNPLA3, and TM6SF2) were also associated with higher AST (n = 360,731) and higher ALT (n = 361,940) in the UK Biobank and also in an independent GWAS of liver enzymes (except for SLC30A10 where data was not available).
SLC30A10 and SLC39A8 encode metal ion transporters and PNPLA3 and TM6SF2 are known genes associated with fatty liver and cirrhosis.cT1 is a continuous trait, and was analysed as such in our GWAS, in line with other continuous traits such as blood pressure, BMI and height.[37], [38], [39] In some earlier publications, cT1 was reported using the LIF (liver inflammation and fibrosis) score (Supplementary Material). The LIF score is a tri-linear mapping of cT1 onto a continuous scale from 0 to 4 based on the association of cT1 with histological fibrosis. LIF categories were defined as having no (LIF <1), mild (LIF 1–1.99), moderate (LIF 2–2.99), or severe (LIF 3–4) liver disease. The LIF cut-off of 1.4 had a sensitivity of 91% and a specificity of 52% for the diagnosis of NASH vs. steatosis (AUROC = 0.80), and corresponds to a cT1 value of 780 ms; a slightly higher cut-off of 800 ms is used in clinical trials and is under evaluation by the FDA and EMA as a diagnostic enrichment biomarker for NASH., The LIF score is no longer used since the medical and MRI physics community is more familiar with T1 for the assessment of inflammation and fibrosis across all specialties including cardiology and neurology.,,[41], [42], [43], [44], [45] In this GWAS study, the cT1 values reported are standardised across the MRI scanner model and field strength, showing very high repeatability and reproducibility.The missense variant (rs13107325-C >T) in SLC39A8 is predicted to be deleterious in both Polyphen-2 and SIFT, and is associated with lower expression of SLC39A8 in human liver.
SLC39A8 encodes ZIP8, which has important roles in inflammation and immunity, and is a negative regulator of the NF-kB pathway. ZIP8 is a divalent cation importer capable of transporting zinc, manganese, iron, cadmium and selinate; the substitution of C for T allele impairs the cellular uptake of metals by this protein. It is not known which metal is involved in liver pathogenicity but there is evidence that hepatic ZIP8 regulates manganese metabolism in the liver, a metal ion that is hepatotoxic at high levels. Zinc and selenium also have important roles in liver cellular injury, oxidative stress and dysregulated inflammation; dietary supplementation of both has shown benefit in animal models of liver disease.,The pathogenic role of SLC39A8 in liver inflammation and fibrosis is supported by studies in mice which provide mechanistic evidence for the critical role of ZIP8 in liver disease. Liu et al. used 2 mouse models to study the function of SLC39A8 in the liver. In the first model, they studied the chronic effect of SLC39A8 knockdown. The SLC39A8(neo/neo) homozygous mice died before or immediately after birth. The SLC39A8(+/neo) heterozygous mice had moderate ZIP8 deficiency which led to disruption of normal hepatocellular architecture, necrosis, inflammation, fibrosis and development of liver tumours with histopathological features consistent with hepatocellular neoplasms. In the second model, they studied liver-specific SLC39A8 knockdown by adenovirus-delivered short-hairpin RNA and demonstrated that liver damage in the chronic model is not due to some extrahepatic process. Liver-specific ZIP8 downregulation for 7 days resulted in substantial hepatomegaly, inflammation, proliferation, oxidative stress, liver injury and cell death.The intronic variant in SLC30A10, a gene which codes a predominantly manganese metal ion transporter, was also associated with elevated cT1 measures in our study, as well as elevated aminotransferases in the UK Biobank. Manganese is an essential metal required for the adequate functioning of numerous enzymes, however it is toxic and induces cell death at elevated cellular levels. Loss-of-function mutations in SLC30A10 have previously been associated with cirrhosis, higher manganese levels in liver biopsy samples and neurotoxicity including parkinsonian-like movement disorders.,The association between cT1 increasing alleles at the 2 novel loci (SLC39A8 and SLC30A10) and higher ALT and AST adds supportive evidence for their pathogenic role in the liver. The missense variant in SLC39A8 has previously been shown to be associated with multiple traits including alcohol intake, BMI, schizophrenia, Crohn's disease, lower brain grey matter volume and microbiome diversity;,[56], [57], [58] we show for the first time a further novel association with higher diabetes and triglyceride levels, whilst highlighting variable effects on cholesterol levels. The associations of both variants with cT1 were independent of BMI, alcohol intake, liver fat percentage and liver iron content in our sensitivity models.We identified a further 2 missense variants that were associated with cT1 but not with elevated aminotransferases; therefore, further research is required to validate these findings and explore their potential role in liver inflammation and fibrosis. The cT1-increasing allele in rs111723834 (missense variant in PCK2, also an intronic variant in NRL) was associated with lower aminotransferases, lower risk of type 2 diabetes, and lower triglycerides. PCK2 encodes a mitochondrial enzyme that catalyses the conversion of oxaloacetate to phosphoenolpyruvate and has a key role in hepatic gluconeogenesis. Mitochondrial phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase deficiency (M-PEPCKD) is a rare autosomal recessive disorder resulting from impaired gluconeogenesis, and clinical characteristics include hypotonia, hepatomegaly, failure to thrive, lactic acidosis and hypoglycaemia. The missense variant in PCK2 is also an intronic variant in NRL, and it is unclear which gene is associated with elevated cT1 measures. NRL however encodes for neural retinal leucine zipper transcription factor that is specifically expressed in neuronal retina cells, making it an unlikely causal gene candidate for liver cT1. The cT1-increasing allele (rs4820268-A >G) in TMPRSS6 has previously been reported to be associated with lower plasma iron levels and lower liver iron content., It is also associated with a dysmetabolic profile including higher LDL cholesterol, higher cardiovascular disease risk and hypertension (Fig. 2). Its effect on cT1 however remained significant even after correcting for liver iron content in sensitivity analyses, making it unlikely that the association was secondary to bias resulting from iron correction when calculating cT1. Previous Mendelian randomisation studies have shown that higher circulating iron may be cardioprotective, possibly through reduced circulating LDL-cholesterol and lower blood pressure. The same mechanisms may explain why the allele associated with lower circulating iron levels is associated with higher cT1.Known NAFLD and cirrhosis risk alleles in PNPLA3 and TM6SF2 were also associated with both elevated cT1 and MRI-derived PDFF in our cohort. These associations provide strong positive controls for our study and validate for the first time the association with MRI-determined liver PDFF. The risk alleles in these 2 genes were further associated with higher risk of type 2 diabetes, but with lower serum triglycerides, LDL cholesterol, and lower risk for cardiovascular disease, as previously described., In our GWAS on PDFF, alongside PNPLA3 and TM6SF2, we further identified variants in GCKR (another known NAFLD variant which we have replicated) and APOE (apolipoprotein E, a gene which encodes a major cholesterol carrier)., The APOE risk allele (T) for PDFF is associated with a higher risk of diabetes, and lower risk of cardiovascular disease and elevated LDL cholesterol in independent GWASs. This data provide evidence that cT1 and PDFF phenotypes share some but not all aetiopathogenic mechanisms.We demonstrated that 4 of 5 variants associated with all-cause liver cirrhosis (in PNPLA3, TM6SF2, HSD17B13, and MARC1) were also associated with liver cT1 with the first 2 reaching genome-wide significance. The paradoxical inverse association between the liver iron-increasing allele in HFE may be due to overcorrection since cT1 measures are corrected for liver iron content and were inversely correlated in our cohort. Adjustment for liver iron content in our sensitivity analysis remarkably attenuated the association with cT1. The SERPINA1 variant was only associated with all-cause cirrhosis in a recessive model. We did not have any homozygotes in our liver cT1 cohort to detect a recessive model of association with cT1.Identifying causal mechanisms to steatohepatitis is crucial since interventions targeting these modifiable exposures may prevent liver disease progression. Our Mendelian randomisation study investigated 24 possible metabolic traits that may cause steatohepatitis. We provide genetic evidence that insulin resistance, non-alcoholic fatty liver and higher BMI causally increase cT1. Recent genetic studies have further identified variants associated with higher BMI but lower risk of type 2 diabetes, hypertension and heart disease. These “favourable adiposity” variants are also associated with higher subcutaneous-to-visceral adipose tissue ratio and may protect from disease through higher adipose storage capacity, by promoting lipid deposition in subcutaneous tissue rather than within the circulation and ectopic places. The inverse link between favourable adiposity and steatohepatitis provides supportive evidence for the protective effects of this phenotype on a variety of cardiometabolic diseases, underlying mechanisms which can be further explored and pointing to future preventive and therapeutic strategies.Our study had several limitations. We did not have any independent cohort to replicate our findings. To overcome this limitation, we investigated associations between cT1 variants and ALT and AST levels both in the UK Biobank and an independent GWAS of liver enzymes. While MRI-derived cT1 is clinically available and is used to assess the severity of steatohepatitis, this measure is still novel, and further research is needed to determine the relative contributions of inflammation and fibrosis to cT1. Whilst it would be useful to have histological reference data for cT1, pathologist-interpreted liver biopsies do not lend themselves to large studies of this nature because of the risk to patients and inter-rater variance in assessment of histology. This may be improved with advances in digitally processed histology and centralised collection of pathological data for large consortia like the European LITMUS study. While cT1 has demonstrated excellent repeatability, and good correlation with fibro-inflammation and clinical outcomes,, other histological phenomena such as simple steatosis and ballooning have been shown to contribute to an increased T1 signal. Only 2 of the 6 cT1 variants were associated with liver steatosis, which highlights the complementarity of cT1 and liver fat PDFF as biomarkers of liver status, and their potential to recognise different mechanisms predisposing individuals to liver disease.
Conclusion
cT1 and PDFF phenotypes share some but not all aetiopathogenic mechanisms. We identified novel associations between an MRI-derived measure of fibroinflammatory liver disease and variants in SLC30A10 and SLC39A8 that replicated with blood biomarkers of hepatocyte injury. These genes have a critical role in transporting heavy metal cofactors for a multitude of biological processes. Future studies may determine whether targeting SLC30A10 and SLC39A8 are possible therapeutic options to prevent liver disease in at-risk individuals. Our Mendelian randomisation study provides genetic evidence that addressing weight gain and insulin resistance are useful strategies in the prevention of steatohepatitis.
Abbreviations
ALP, alkaline phosphatase; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; BMI, body mass index; CAD, coronary artery disease; cT1, corrected T1; EA, effect allele; EAF, effect allele frequency; GGT, gamma-glutamyltransferase; GWAS, genome-wide association study; HDL-C, HDL-cholesterol; IVW, inverse variance weighted; LD, linkage disequilibrium; LDL-C, LDL cholesterol; LIF, liver inflammation and fibrosis; NAFLD, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease; NASH, non-alcoholic steatohepatitis; PC, principal components; PDFF, proton density fat fraction; OA, other allele; OR, odds ratio; ShMOLLI, shortened modified look locker inversion; SNP, single-nucleotide polymorphism; T2DM, type 2 diabetes; WHR_BMI, waist hip ratio adjusted for BMI.
Financial support
H.Y. is funded by a Diabetes UK RD Lawrence fellowship (17/0005594). C.A.P is funded by a Clinical PhD Programme (206274/Z/17/Z). H.W is funded by an Innovate UK Knowledge Transfer Partnership (KTP10271). H.H is a National Institute for Health Research Senior Investigator.
Authors' contributions
C.A.P, H.W, H.Y, R.B. were involved in the study conception and design, analysis and writing of the manuscript. J.M and R.C.N were involved in analysis. H.H, A.D.H, R.S.P, C.A.P. E.L.T, J.B. edited the manuscript. S.N, R.B, M.K. edited the manuscript and provided the infrastructure underlying the MRI liver cT1 measurements.
Ethical approval
This research has been conducted using data from the UK Biobank resource and carried out under UK Biobank project application number 9914. UK Biobank protocols were approved by the National Research Ethics Service Committee.
Patient consent
No participants were directly involved in our study, as we used data derived from the UK Biobank study, under project application number 9914. For the UK Biobank overall study, participants signed written informed consent, specifically applicable to health-related research. All ethical regulations were followed. No patients or participants were specifically or directly involved in setting the research question or the outcome measures or in developing plans for recruitment, design, or implementation of this study. No patients were asked to advise on interpretation or drafting of results. There are no specific plans to disseminate the research results to study participants, but the UK Biobank disseminates key findings from projects on its website.
Data availability
Full data including individual cT1 and PDFF measures will be returned to UK Biobank and made publicly available via application (amsportal.ukbiobank.ac.uk).
Conflict of interest
M.K, J.M, R.C.N and R.B. are employees and shareholders of Perspectum Diagnostics. H.W. and S.N. are shareholders in Perspectum Diagnostics.
Authors: Bo Kobberø Lauridsen; Stefan Stender; Thomas Skårup Kristensen; Klaus Fuglsang Kofoed; Lars Køber; Børge G Nordestgaard; Anne Tybjærg-Hansen Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2018-02-01 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Elizabeth K Speliotes; Cristen J Willer; Sonja I Berndt; Keri L Monda; Gudmar Thorleifsson; Anne U Jackson; Hana Lango Allen; Cecilia M Lindgren; Jian'an Luan; Reedik Mägi; Joshua C Randall; Sailaja Vedantam; Thomas W Winkler; Lu Qi; Tsegaselassie Workalemahu; Iris M Heid; Valgerdur Steinthorsdottir; Heather M Stringham; Michael N Weedon; Eleanor Wheeler; Andrew R Wood; Teresa Ferreira; Robert J Weyant; Ayellet V Segrè; Karol Estrada; Liming Liang; James Nemesh; Ju-Hyun Park; Stefan Gustafsson; Tuomas O Kilpeläinen; Jian Yang; Nabila Bouatia-Naji; Tõnu Esko; Mary F Feitosa; Zoltán Kutalik; Massimo Mangino; Soumya Raychaudhuri; Andre Scherag; Albert Vernon Smith; Ryan Welch; Jing Hua Zhao; Katja K Aben; Devin M Absher; Najaf Amin; Anna L Dixon; Eva Fisher; Nicole L Glazer; Michael E Goddard; Nancy L Heard-Costa; Volker Hoesel; Jouke-Jan Hottenga; Asa Johansson; Toby Johnson; Shamika Ketkar; Claudia Lamina; Shengxu Li; Miriam F Moffatt; Richard H Myers; Narisu Narisu; John R B Perry; Marjolein J Peters; Michael Preuss; Samuli Ripatti; Fernando Rivadeneira; Camilla Sandholt; Laura J Scott; Nicholas J Timpson; Jonathan P Tyrer; Sophie van Wingerden; Richard M Watanabe; Charles C White; Fredrik Wiklund; Christina Barlassina; Daniel I Chasman; Matthew N Cooper; John-Olov Jansson; Robert W Lawrence; Niina Pellikka; Inga Prokopenko; Jianxin Shi; Elisabeth Thiering; Helene Alavere; Maria T S Alibrandi; Peter Almgren; Alice M Arnold; Thor Aspelund; Larry D Atwood; Beverley Balkau; Anthony J Balmforth; Amanda J Bennett; Yoav Ben-Shlomo; Richard N Bergman; Sven Bergmann; Heike Biebermann; Alexandra I F Blakemore; Tanja Boes; Lori L Bonnycastle; Stefan R Bornstein; Morris J Brown; Thomas A Buchanan; Fabio Busonero; Harry Campbell; Francesco P Cappuccio; Christine Cavalcanti-Proença; Yii-Der Ida Chen; Chih-Mei Chen; Peter S Chines; Robert Clarke; Lachlan Coin; John Connell; Ian N M Day; Martin den Heijer; Jubao Duan; Shah Ebrahim; Paul Elliott; Roberto Elosua; Gudny Eiriksdottir; Michael R Erdos; Johan G Eriksson; Maurizio F Facheris; Stephan B Felix; Pamela Fischer-Posovszky; Aaron R Folsom; Nele Friedrich; Nelson B Freimer; Mao Fu; Stefan Gaget; Pablo V Gejman; Eco J C Geus; Christian Gieger; Anette P Gjesing; Anuj Goel; Philippe Goyette; Harald Grallert; Jürgen Grässler; Danielle M Greenawalt; Christopher J Groves; Vilmundur Gudnason; Candace Guiducci; Anna-Liisa Hartikainen; Neelam Hassanali; Alistair S Hall; Aki S Havulinna; Caroline Hayward; Andrew C Heath; Christian Hengstenberg; Andrew A Hicks; Anke Hinney; Albert Hofman; Georg Homuth; Jennie Hui; Wilmar Igl; Carlos Iribarren; Bo Isomaa; Kevin B Jacobs; Ivonne Jarick; Elizabeth Jewell; Ulrich John; Torben Jørgensen; Pekka Jousilahti; Antti Jula; Marika Kaakinen; Eero Kajantie; Lee M Kaplan; Sekar Kathiresan; Johannes Kettunen; Leena Kinnunen; Joshua W Knowles; Ivana Kolcic; Inke R König; Seppo Koskinen; Peter Kovacs; Johanna Kuusisto; Peter Kraft; Kirsti Kvaløy; Jaana Laitinen; Olivier Lantieri; Chiara Lanzani; Lenore J Launer; Cecile Lecoeur; Terho Lehtimäki; Guillaume Lettre; Jianjun Liu; Marja-Liisa Lokki; Mattias Lorentzon; Robert N Luben; Barbara Ludwig; Paolo Manunta; Diana Marek; Michel Marre; Nicholas G Martin; Wendy L McArdle; Anne McCarthy; Barbara McKnight; Thomas Meitinger; Olle Melander; David Meyre; Kristian Midthjell; Grant W Montgomery; Mario A Morken; Andrew P Morris; Rosanda Mulic; Julius S Ngwa; Mari Nelis; Matt J Neville; Dale R Nyholt; Christopher J O'Donnell; Stephen O'Rahilly; Ken K Ong; Ben Oostra; Guillaume Paré; Alex N Parker; Markus Perola; Irene Pichler; Kirsi H Pietiläinen; Carl G P Platou; Ozren Polasek; Anneli Pouta; Suzanne Rafelt; Olli Raitakari; Nigel W Rayner; Martin Ridderstråle; Winfried Rief; Aimo Ruokonen; Neil R Robertson; Peter Rzehak; Veikko Salomaa; Alan R Sanders; Manjinder S Sandhu; Serena Sanna; Jouko Saramies; Markku J Savolainen; Susann Scherag; Sabine Schipf; Stefan Schreiber; Heribert Schunkert; Kaisa Silander; Juha Sinisalo; David S Siscovick; Jan H Smit; Nicole Soranzo; Ulla Sovio; Jonathan Stephens; Ida Surakka; Amy J Swift; Mari-Liis Tammesoo; Jean-Claude Tardif; Maris Teder-Laving; Tanya M Teslovich; John R Thompson; Brian Thomson; Anke Tönjes; Tiinamaija Tuomi; Joyce B J van Meurs; Gert-Jan van Ommen; Vincent Vatin; Jorma Viikari; Sophie Visvikis-Siest; Veronique Vitart; Carla I G Vogel; Benjamin F Voight; Lindsay L Waite; Henri Wallaschofski; G Bragi Walters; Elisabeth Widen; Susanna Wiegand; Sarah H Wild; Gonneke Willemsen; Daniel R Witte; Jacqueline C Witteman; Jianfeng Xu; Qunyuan Zhang; Lina Zgaga; Andreas Ziegler; Paavo Zitting; John P Beilby; I Sadaf Farooqi; Johannes Hebebrand; Heikki V Huikuri; Alan L James; Mika Kähönen; Douglas F Levinson; Fabio Macciardi; Markku S Nieminen; Claes Ohlsson; Lyle J Palmer; Paul M Ridker; Michael Stumvoll; Jacques S Beckmann; Heiner Boeing; Eric Boerwinkle; Dorret I Boomsma; Mark J Caulfield; Stephen J Chanock; Francis S Collins; L Adrienne Cupples; George Davey Smith; Jeanette Erdmann; Philippe Froguel; Henrik Grönberg; Ulf Gyllensten; Per Hall; Torben Hansen; Tamara B Harris; Andrew T Hattersley; Richard B Hayes; Joachim Heinrich; Frank B Hu; Kristian Hveem; Thomas Illig; Marjo-Riitta Jarvelin; Jaakko Kaprio; Fredrik Karpe; Kay-Tee Khaw; Lambertus A Kiemeney; Heiko Krude; Markku Laakso; Debbie A Lawlor; Andres Metspalu; Patricia B Munroe; Willem H Ouwehand; Oluf Pedersen; Brenda W Penninx; Annette Peters; Peter P Pramstaller; Thomas Quertermous; Thomas Reinehr; Aila Rissanen; Igor Rudan; Nilesh J Samani; Peter E H Schwarz; Alan R Shuldiner; Timothy D Spector; Jaakko Tuomilehto; Manuela Uda; André Uitterlinden; Timo T Valle; Martin Wabitsch; Gérard Waeber; Nicholas J Wareham; Hugh Watkins; James F Wilson; Alan F Wright; M Carola Zillikens; Nilanjan Chatterjee; Steven A McCarroll; Shaun Purcell; Eric E Schadt; Peter M Visscher; Themistocles L Assimes; Ingrid B Borecki; Panos Deloukas; Caroline S Fox; Leif C Groop; Talin Haritunians; David J Hunter; Robert C Kaplan; Karen L Mohlke; Jeffrey R O'Connell; Leena Peltonen; David Schlessinger; David P Strachan; Cornelia M van Duijn; H-Erich Wichmann; Timothy M Frayling; Unnur Thorsteinsdottir; Gonçalo R Abecasis; Inês Barroso; Michael Boehnke; Kari Stefansson; Kari E North; Mark I McCarthy; Joel N Hirschhorn; Erik Ingelsson; Ruth J F Loos Journal: Nat Genet Date: 2010-10-10 Impact factor: 38.330
Authors: Henry R Wilman; Constantinos A Parisinos; Naeimeh Atabaki-Pasdar; Matt Kelly; E Louise Thomas; Stefan Neubauer; Anubha Mahajan; Aroon D Hingorani; Riyaz S Patel; Harry Hemingway; Paul W Franks; Jimmy D Bell; Rajarshi Banerjee; Hanieh Yaghootkar Journal: J Hepatol Date: 2019-06-19 Impact factor: 25.083
Authors: Yingchang Lu; Felix R Day; Stefan Gustafsson; Martin L Buchkovich; Jianbo Na; Veronique Bataille; Diana L Cousminer; Zari Dastani; Alexander W Drong; Tõnu Esko; David M Evans; Mario Falchi; Mary F Feitosa; Teresa Ferreira; Åsa K Hedman; Robin Haring; Pirro G Hysi; Mark M Iles; Anne E Justice; Stavroula Kanoni; Vasiliki Lagou; Rui Li; Xin Li; Adam Locke; Chen Lu; Reedik Mägi; John R B Perry; Tune H Pers; Qibin Qi; Marianna Sanna; Ellen M Schmidt; William R Scott; Dmitry Shungin; Alexander Teumer; Anna A E Vinkhuyzen; Ryan W Walker; Harm-Jan Westra; Mingfeng Zhang; Weihua Zhang; Jing Hua Zhao; Zhihong Zhu; Uzma Afzal; Tarunveer Singh Ahluwalia; Stephan J L Bakker; Claire Bellis; Amélie Bonnefond; Katja Borodulin; Aron S Buchman; Tommy Cederholm; Audrey C Choh; Hyung Jin Choi; Joanne E Curran; Lisette C P G M de Groot; Philip L De Jager; Rosalie A M Dhonukshe-Rutten; Anke W Enneman; Elodie Eury; Daniel S Evans; Tom Forsen; Nele Friedrich; Frédéric Fumeron; Melissa E Garcia; Simone Gärtner; Bok-Ghee Han; Aki S Havulinna; Caroline Hayward; Dena Hernandez; Hans Hillege; Till Ittermann; Jack W Kent; Ivana Kolcic; Tiina Laatikainen; Jari Lahti; Irene Mateo Leach; Christine G Lee; Jong-Young Lee; Tian Liu; Youfang Liu; Stéphane Lobbens; Marie Loh; Leo-Pekka Lyytikäinen; Carolina Medina-Gomez; Karl Michaëlsson; Mike A Nalls; Carrie M Nielson; Laticia Oozageer; Laura Pascoe; Lavinia Paternoster; Ozren Polašek; Samuli Ripatti; Mark A Sarzynski; Chan Soo Shin; Nina Smolej Narančić; Dominik Spira; Priya Srikanth; Elisabeth Steinhagen-Thiessen; Yun Ju Sung; Karin M A Swart; Leena Taittonen; Toshiko Tanaka; Emmi Tikkanen; Nathalie van der Velde; Natasja M van Schoor; Niek Verweij; Alan F Wright; Lei Yu; Joseph M Zmuda; Niina Eklund; Terrence Forrester; Niels Grarup; Anne U Jackson; Kati Kristiansson; Teemu Kuulasmaa; Johanna Kuusisto; Peter Lichtner; Jian'an Luan; Anubha Mahajan; Satu Männistö; Cameron D Palmer; Janina S Ried; Robert A Scott; Alena Stancáková; Peter J Wagner; Ayse Demirkan; Angela Döring; Vilmundur Gudnason; Douglas P Kiel; Brigitte Kühnel; Massimo Mangino; Barbara Mcknight; Cristina Menni; Jeffrey R O'Connell; Ben A Oostra; Alan R Shuldiner; Kijoung Song; Liesbeth Vandenput; Cornelia M van Duijn; Peter Vollenweider; Charles C White; Michael Boehnke; Yvonne Boettcher; Richard S Cooper; Nita G Forouhi; Christian Gieger; Harald Grallert; Aroon Hingorani; Torben Jørgensen; Pekka Jousilahti; Mika Kivimaki; Meena Kumari; Markku Laakso; Claudia Langenberg; Allan Linneberg; Amy Luke; Colin A Mckenzie; Aarno Palotie; Oluf Pedersen; Annette Peters; Konstantin Strauch; Bamidele O Tayo; Nicholas J Wareham; David A Bennett; Lars Bertram; John Blangero; Matthias Blüher; Claude Bouchard; Harry Campbell; Nam H Cho; Steven R Cummings; Stefan A Czerwinski; Ilja Demuth; Rahel Eckardt; Johan G Eriksson; Luigi Ferrucci; Oscar H Franco; Philippe Froguel; Ron T Gansevoort; Torben Hansen; Tamara B Harris; Nicholas Hastie; Markku Heliövaara; Albert Hofman; Joanne M Jordan; Antti Jula; Mika Kähönen; Eero Kajantie; Paul B Knekt; Seppo Koskinen; Peter Kovacs; Terho Lehtimäki; Lars Lind; Yongmei Liu; Eric S Orwoll; Clive Osmond; Markus Perola; Louis Pérusse; Olli T Raitakari; Tuomo Rankinen; D C Rao; Treva K Rice; Fernando Rivadeneira; Igor Rudan; Veikko Salomaa; Thorkild I A Sørensen; Michael Stumvoll; Anke Tönjes; Bradford Towne; Gregory J Tranah; Angelo Tremblay; André G Uitterlinden; Pim van der Harst; Erkki Vartiainen; Jorma S Viikari; Veronique Vitart; Marie-Claude Vohl; Henry Völzke; Mark Walker; Henri Wallaschofski; Sarah Wild; James F Wilson; Loïc Yengo; D Timothy Bishop; Ingrid B Borecki; John C Chambers; L Adrienne Cupples; Abbas Dehghan; Panos Deloukas; Ghazaleh Fatemifar; Caroline Fox; Terrence S Furey; Lude Franke; Jiali Han; David J Hunter; Juha Karjalainen; Fredrik Karpe; Robert C Kaplan; Jaspal S Kooner; Mark I McCarthy; Joanne M Murabito; Andrew P Morris; Julia A N Bishop; Kari E North; Claes Ohlsson; Ken K Ong; Inga Prokopenko; J Brent Richards; Eric E Schadt; Tim D Spector; Elisabeth Widén; Cristen J Willer; Jian Yang; Erik Ingelsson; Karen L Mohlke; Joel N Hirschhorn; John Andrew Pospisilik; M Carola Zillikens; Cecilia Lindgren; Tuomas Oskari Kilpeläinen; Ruth J F Loos Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2016-02-01 Impact factor: 14.919
Authors: Gabe Haller; Kevin McCall; Supak Jenkitkasemwong; Brooke Sadler; Lilian Antunes; Momchil Nikolov; Julia Whittle; Zachary Upshaw; Jimann Shin; Erin Baschal; Carlos Cruchaga; Matthew Harms; Cathleen Raggio; Jose A Morcuende; Philip Giampietro; Nancy H Miller; Carol Wise; Ryan S Gray; Lila Solnica-Krezel; Mitchell Knutson; Matthew B Dobbs; Christina A Gurnett Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2018-10-09 Impact factor: 14.919
Authors: Lloyd T Elliott; Kevin Sharp; Fidel Alfaro-Almagro; Sinan Shi; Karla L Miller; Gwenaëlle Douaud; Jonathan Marchini; Stephen M Smith Journal: Nature Date: 2018-10-10 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Mary E Haas; James P Pirruccello; Samuel N Friedman; Minxian Wang; Connor A Emdin; Veeral H Ajmera; Tracey G Simon; Julian R Homburger; Xiuqing Guo; Matthew Budoff; Kathleen E Corey; Alicia Y Zhou; Anthony Philippakis; Patrick T Ellinor; Rohit Loomba; Puneet Batra; Amit V Khera Journal: Cell Genom Date: 2021-12-08
Authors: Adriana Roca-Fernández; Andrea Dennis; Rowan Nicholls; John McGonigle; Matthew Kelly; Rajarshi Banerjee; Amitava Banerjee; Arun J Sanyal Journal: Front Med (Lausanne) Date: 2021-03-29
Authors: Robert G Mealer; Bruce G Jenkins; Chia-Yen Chen; Mark J Daly; Tian Ge; Sylvain Lehoux; Thorsten Marquardt; Christopher D Palmer; Julien H Park; Patrick J Parsons; Robert Sackstein; Sarah E Williams; Richard D Cummings; Edward M Scolnick; Jordan W Smoller Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2020-08-04 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: E Louise Thomas; Madeleine Cule; Yi Liu; Nicolas Basty; Brandon Whitcher; Jimmy D Bell; Elena P Sorokin; Nick van Bruggen Journal: Elife Date: 2021-06-15 Impact factor: 8.140