Marco Spadaccini1, Eduardo Albéniz2, Heiko Pohl3, Roberta Maselli4, Viveksandeep Thoguluva Chandrasekar5, Loredana Correale4, Andrea Anderloni4, Silvia Carrara4, Alessandro Fugazza4, Matteo Badalamenti6, Mineo Iwatate7, Giulio Antonelli8, Mónica Enguita-Germán2, Marco Antonio Álvarez9, Prateek Sharma5, Douglas K Rex10, Cesare Hassan8, Alessandro Repici11. 1. Humanitas Research Hospital, Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Rozzano, Italy; Humanitas University, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Rozzano, Italy. Electronic address: marco.spadaccini@humanitas.it. 2. Navarrabiomed Research Institute/Public University of Navarra/IdiSNA, Endoscopy Research Department, Pamplona, Spain. 3. Dartmouth Geisel School of Medicine, Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Hanover, New Hampshire. 4. Humanitas Research Hospital, Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Rozzano, Italy. 5. Kansas City Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kansas City, Missouri. 6. Humanitas University, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Rozzano, Italy. 7. Sano Hospital, Gastrointestinal Center and Institute of Minimally Invasive Endoscopic Care, Kobe, Japan. 8. Hospital del Mar, Gastroenterology Department, Barcelona, Spain. 9. Indiana University School of Medicine, Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Indianapolis, Indiana. 10. Nuovo Regina Margherita Hospital, Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Rome, Italy. 11. Humanitas Research Hospital, Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Rozzano, Italy; Humanitas University, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Rozzano, Italy.
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS: The benefits of prophylactic clipping to prevent bleeding after polypectomy are unclear. We conducted an updated meta-analysis of randomized trials to assess the efficacy of clipping in preventing bleeding after polypectomy, overall and according to polyp size and location. METHODS: We searched the MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases for randomized trials that compared the effects of clipping vs not clipping to prevent bleeding after polypectomy. We performed a random-effects meta-analysis to generate pooled relative risks (RRs) with 95% CIs. Multilevel random-effects metaregression analysis was used to combine data on bleeding after polypectomy and estimate associations between rates of bleeding and polyp characteristics. RESULTS: We analyzed data from 9 trials, comprising 71897 colorectal lesions (22.5% 20 mm or larger; 49.2% with proximal location). Clipping, compared with no clipping, did not significantly reduce the overall risk of postpolypectomy bleeding (2.2% with clipping vs 3.3% with no clipping; RR, 0.69; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.45-1.08; P = .072). Clipping significantly reduced risk of bleeding after removal of polyps that were 20 mm or larger (4.3% had bleeding after clipping vs 7.6% had bleeding with no clipping; RR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.33-0.78; P = .020) or that were in a proximal location (3.0% had bleeding after clipping vs 6.2% had bleeding with no clipping; RR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.35-0.81; P < .001). In multilevel metaregression analysis that adjusted for polyp size and location, prophylactic clipping was significantly associated with reduced risk of bleeding after removal of large proximal polyps (RR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.22-0.61; P = .021) but not small proximal lesions (RR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.48-1.62; P = .581). CONCLUSIONS: In a meta-analysis of randomized trials, we found that routine use of prophylactic clipping does not reduce risk of postpolypectomy bleeding overall. However, clipping appeared to reduce bleeding after removal of large (more than 20 mm) proximal lesions.
BACKGROUND & AIMS: The benefits of prophylactic clipping to prevent bleeding after polypectomy are unclear. We conducted an updated meta-analysis of randomized trials to assess the efficacy of clipping in preventing bleeding after polypectomy, overall and according to polyp size and location. METHODS: We searched the MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases for randomized trials that compared the effects of clipping vs not clipping to prevent bleeding after polypectomy. We performed a random-effects meta-analysis to generate pooled relative risks (RRs) with 95% CIs. Multilevel random-effects metaregression analysis was used to combine data on bleeding after polypectomy and estimate associations between rates of bleeding and polyp characteristics. RESULTS: We analyzed data from 9 trials, comprising 71897 colorectal lesions (22.5% 20 mm or larger; 49.2% with proximal location). Clipping, compared with no clipping, did not significantly reduce the overall risk of postpolypectomy bleeding (2.2% with clipping vs 3.3% with no clipping; RR, 0.69; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.45-1.08; P = .072). Clipping significantly reduced risk of bleeding after removal of polyps that were 20 mm or larger (4.3% had bleeding after clipping vs 7.6% had bleeding with no clipping; RR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.33-0.78; P = .020) or that were in a proximal location (3.0% had bleeding after clipping vs 6.2% had bleeding with no clipping; RR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.35-0.81; P < .001). In multilevel metaregression analysis that adjusted for polyp size and location, prophylactic clipping was significantly associated with reduced risk of bleeding after removal of large proximal polyps (RR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.22-0.61; P = .021) but not small proximal lesions (RR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.48-1.62; P = .581). CONCLUSIONS: In a meta-analysis of randomized trials, we found that routine use of prophylactic clipping does not reduce risk of postpolypectomy bleeding overall. However, clipping appeared to reduce bleeding after removal of large (more than 20 mm) proximal lesions.
Authors: Neena S Abraham; Alan N Barkun; Bryan G Sauer; James Douketis; Loren Laine; Peter A Noseworthy; Jennifer J Telford; Grigorios I Leontiadis Journal: J Can Assoc Gastroenterol Date: 2022-03-17
Authors: Kirles Bishay; Zhao Wu Meng; Levi Frehlich; Matthew T James; Gilaad G Kaplan; Michael J Bourke; Robert J Hilsden; Steven J Heitman; Nauzer Forbes Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2021-03-09 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Oliver Bendall; Joel James; Katarzyna M Pawlak; Sauid Ishaq; J Andy Tau; Noriko Suzuki; Steven Bollipo; Keith Siau Journal: Clin Exp Gastroenterol Date: 2021-12-24